Michael Pendleton, Pet v. Randall B. Todd
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
MICHAEL PENDLETON, : No. 101 WM 2016 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : RANDALL B. TODD, ET AL., : : Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 13th day of October, 2016, the Application for Leave to File
Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Prohibition are DISMISSED. See
Commonwealth v. Reid, 642 A.2d 453 (Pa. 1994) (stating that hybrid representation is
impermissible).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Michael Pendleton, Pet v. Randall B. Todd, (Pa. 2016).
Michael Pendleton, Pet v. Randall B. Todd (Michael Pendleton, Pet v. Randall B. Todd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Commonwealth v. Reid
642 A.2d 453 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1994)