Michael Paul Young, II v. Judge Mike Russell, in His Official Capacity as Presiding Judge of the 146th District Court of Bell County, Texas
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-25-00253-CV
Michael Paul Young, II, Appellant
v.
Judge Mike Russell, in His Official Capacity as Presiding Judge of the 146th District Court of Bell County, Texas, Appellee
FROM THE 146TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY NO. 24DFAM348794, THE HONORABLE JAMES LEE CARROLL, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant has filed his notice of interlocutory appeal, appearing to complain of
the trial court’s April 4, 2025, ruling on his objection to the scheduling of a hearing on his
motion to recuse the presiding judge in the underlying SAPCR proceeding. However, after
appellant filed his notice, on April 11, 2025, the trial court entered its final order of termination.
Because the final April 11 order supersedes the trial court’s prior April 4 ruling, appellant’s
interlocutory appeal is now moot, and the proper vehicle for him to challenge any errors
committed in the proceedings below is a direct appeal. Therefore, we dismiss appellant’s
interlocutory appeal as moot. __________________________________________ Maggie Ellis, Justice
Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Kelly, Ellis
Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction
Filed: May 30, 2025
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Michael Paul Young, II v. Judge Mike Russell, in His Official Capacity as Presiding Judge of the 146th District Court of Bell County, Texas (Michael Paul Young, II v. Judge Mike Russell, in His Official Capacity as Presiding Judge of the 146th District Court of Bell County, Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.