Michael Paul Parkinson v. State
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE
FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER ON MOTION
Cause number: 01-14-00476-CR Style: Michael Paul Parkinson v. The State of Texas Date motion filed*: March 19, 2015 Type of motion: Second Motion to Extend Time to File Appellant’s Brief Party filing motion: Appellant Document to be filed: Appellant’s brief
Is appeal accelerated? No.
If motion to extend time:
Original due date: January 9, 2015 Number of extensions granted: 1 Current Due Date: April 9, 2015 Date Requested: June 9, 2015
Ordered that motion is:
Granted If document is to be filed, document due: No further extensions of time will be granted Denied Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot) Other: _____________________________________ Given the notice from the Clerk of Court on 1/8/15 granting appellant’s motion for an extension of time to file appellant’s brief advised appellant that no further extensions would be granted, since the first motion requested 90 days, and because there are still 2 weeks until the 4/9/15 deadline, we DENY appellant’s second motion for a 60-day extension. Accordingly, if the appellant’s brief is not filed by 4/9/15, we will abate this case for a hearing. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38(b)(2).
Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley
Date: March 24, 2015 November 7, 2008 Revision
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Michael Paul Parkinson v. State (Michael Paul Parkinson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.