Michael Parks v. The State of Florida
This text of Michael Parks v. The State of Florida (Michael Parks v. The State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed September 20, 2023. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D23-1449 Lower Tribunal No. F10-6731 ________________
Michael Parks, Appellant,
vs.
The State of Florida, Appellee.
An appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Miguel M. de la O, Judge.
Michael Parks, in proper person.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.
Before EMAS, MILLER, and LOBREE, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Morris v. State, 727 So. 2d 975, 977 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999)
(“An acquittal in a criminal case does not preclude the judge from
determining that a parole or probation violation has occurred based on the
same conduct.”); Eustache v. State, 248 So. 3d 1097, 1100 (Fla. 2018)
(“Florida courts have consistently treated conduct involving a new criminal
offense, such as [appellant’s] illegal drug possession, as a substantive
violation.”); Flagg v. State, 179 So. 3d 394, 397 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015) (“Where
there has been a substantive violation, such as a new law offense, a
previously designated youthful offender may be sentenced above the six-
year cap up to the statutory maximum for the underlying offenses.”); see also
§ 810.02(2), Fla. Stat. (2010).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Michael Parks v. The State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-parks-v-the-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2023.