Michael Parks v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 30, 2025·No. 3D2025-0313·Published

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed April 30, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D25-0313 Lower Tribunal No. F10-6731 ________________

Michael Parks, Appellant,

vs.

State of Florida, Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Miguel M. de la O, Judge.

Michael Parks, in proper person.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Ivy R. Ginsberg, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, MILLER and GOODEN, JJ.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Eustache v. State, 248 So. 3d 1097, 1100-01 (Fla.

2018) (holding, upon revocation of a youthful offender’s probation for a

substantive violation, the trial court is authorized to either impose another

youthful offender sentence with no minimum mandatory, or to impose an

adult Criminal Punishment Code sentence, which would require imposition

of any minimum mandatory term of incarceration associated with the offense

of conviction); Parks v. State, 256 So. 3d 969, 970 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Michael Parks v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2025).

Michael Parks v. State of Florida (Michael Parks v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Robin Eustache v. State of Florida
248 So. 3d 1097 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2018)
Parks v. State
256 So. 3d 969 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)