Michael Parkinson v. Shinobu Parkinson

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 23, 2014·No. 01-13-00387-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued January 23, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-13-00387-CV ——————————— MICHAEL PARKINSON, Appellant V. SHINOBU PARKINSON, Appellee

On Appeal from the 300th District Court Brazoria County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 70903

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Michael Parkinson, has neither paid the required fees nor

established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5

(requiring payment of fees in civil cases unless indigent), 20.1 (listing

requirements for establishing indigence); see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.941(a), 101.041 (West 2013) (listing fees in court of appeals); Order

Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of

Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket

No. 07-9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in TEX. R. APP. P. app. A § B(1)

(listing fees in court of appeals). After being notified that this appeal was subject

to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 (allowing

enforcement of rule), 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case).

We dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees. We dismiss any

pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Massengale and Huddle.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Michael Parkinson v. Shinobu Parkinson, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Michael Parkinson v. Shinobu Parkinson (Michael Parkinson v. Shinobu Parkinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.