Michael P. v. Diana G.
This text of 556 N.E.2d 1115 (Michael P. v. Diana G.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal denied. Motion for a stay dis[1004]*1004missed as academic. The Court of Appeals restates the rule that denial of a motion for leave to appeal is not equivalent to an affirmance and has no precedential value (see, e.g., Matter of Marchant v Mead-Morrison Mfg. Co., 252 NY 284, 297-298 [Cardozo, Ch. J.]; New York Pub. Interest Research Group v Governor’s Advisory Commn., 71 NY2d 964).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
556 N.E.2d 1115, 75 N.Y.2d 1003, 557 N.Y.S.2d 308, 1990 N.Y. LEXIS 1088, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-p-v-diana-g-ny-1990.