Michael P. v. Diana G.

556 N.E.2d 1115, 75 N.Y.2d 1003, 557 N.Y.S.2d 308, 1990 N.Y. LEXIS 1088
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 10, 1990
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 556 N.E.2d 1115 (Michael P. v. Diana G.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Michael P. v. Diana G., 556 N.E.2d 1115, 75 N.Y.2d 1003, 557 N.Y.S.2d 308, 1990 N.Y. LEXIS 1088 (N.Y. 1990).

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal denied. Motion for a stay dis[1004]*1004missed as academic. The Court of Appeals restates the rule that denial of a motion for leave to appeal is not equivalent to an affirmance and has no precedential value (see, e.g., Matter of Marchant v Mead-Morrison Mfg. Co., 252 NY 284, 297-298 [Cardozo, Ch. J.]; New York Pub. Interest Research Group v Governor’s Advisory Commn., 71 NY2d 964).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Estate of Berwick v. State
76 N.Y.2d 884 (New York Court of Appeals, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
556 N.E.2d 1115, 75 N.Y.2d 1003, 557 N.Y.S.2d 308, 1990 N.Y. LEXIS 1088, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-p-v-diana-g-ny-1990.