Michael P. v. Diana G.
556 N.E.2d 1115, 75 N.Y.2d 1003, 557 N.Y.S.2d 308, 1990 N.Y. LEXIS 1088
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal denied. Motion for a stay dis[1004]*1004missed as academic. The Court of Appeals restates the rule that denial of a motion for leave to appeal is not equivalent to an affirmance and has no precedential value (see, e.g., Matter of Marchant v Mead-Morrison Mfg. Co., 252 NY 284, 297-298 [Cardozo, Ch. J.]; New York Pub. Interest Research Group v Governor’s Advisory Commn., 71 NY2d 964).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Michael P. v. Diana G., 556 N.E.2d 1115, 75 N.Y.2d 1003, 557 N.Y.S.2d 308, 1990 N.Y. LEXIS 1088 (N.Y. 1990).
556 N.E.2d 1115 (Michael P. v. Diana G.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Estate of Berwick v. State
76 N.Y.2d 884 (New York Court of Appeals, 1990)