Michael Olszak Gonzales v. Regina Gonzales

Court of Appeals of Texas

Michael Olszak Gonzales v. Regina Gonzales

DecidedDecember 29, 2022

Docket14-22-00704-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Michael Olszak Gonzales v. Regina Gonzales (Michael Olszak Gonzales v. Regina Gonzales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Michael Olszak Gonzales v. Regina Gonzales, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed December 29, 2022.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-22-00704-CV

MICHAEL OLSZAK GONZALES, Appellant

V.

REGINA GONZALES, Appellee

On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 2 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 501867

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is from an order signed August 30, 2022 appointing a permanent guardian of a ward’s person and estate. No clerk’s record has been filed. The clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court appellant did not make arrangements to pay for the record.

On October 28, 2022, notification was transmitted to appellant of the court’s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within fifteen days, appellant paid or made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). No response was filed. On November 17, 2022, appellant was ordered to provide this court with proof of payment for the record on or before November 28, 2022. See Tex. R. App. P. 4.1(a), 35.3(c). In the order, the court notified appellant that failure to comply with the court’s order would make the appeal subject to dismissal without further notice for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). Appellant has not filed any response demonstrating he has paid for the record. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Bourliot and Wilson.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed December 29, 2022.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-22-00704-CV

MICHAEL OLSZAK GONZALES, Appellant

V.

REGINA GONZALES, Appellee

On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 2 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 501867

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is from an order signed August 30, 2022 appointing a permanent guardian of a ward’s person and estate. No clerk’s record has been filed. The clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court appellant did not make arrangements to pay for the record.

On October 28, 2022, notification was transmitted to appellant of the court’s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within fifteen days, appellant paid or made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). No response was filed. On November 17, 2022, appellant was ordered to provide this court with proof of payment for the record on or before November 28, 2022. See Tex. R. App. P. 4.1(a), 35.3(c). In the order, the court notified appellant that failure to comply with the court’s order would make the appeal subject to dismissal without further notice for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). Appellant has not filed any response demonstrating he has paid for the record. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Bourliot and Wilson.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Michael Olszak Gonzales v. Regina Gonzales, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-olszak-gonzales-v-regina-gonzales-texapp-2022.