Michael Newhouse v. Ford Motor Co.

22 F. App'x 694
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedDecember 13, 2001
Docket01-2866
StatusUnpublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 22 F. App'x 694 (Michael Newhouse v. Ford Motor Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Michael Newhouse v. Ford Motor Co., 22 F. App'x 694 (8th Cir. 2001).

Opinion

[UNPUBLISHED]

PER CURIAM.

Michael Newhouse appeals the district court’s 1 order granting Ford Motor Company’s motion to enforce a settlement agreement. Because Newhouse failed to carry his burden to show that his attorney *695 lacked authority to enter into the settlement, see Turner v. Burlington N. R.R. Co., 771 F.2d 341, 345-46 (8th Cir.1985), we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R 47B. We deny appellee’s pending motion as moot.

1

. The Honorable Howard F. Sachs, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 F. App'x 694, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-newhouse-v-ford-motor-co-ca8-2001.