Michael Murray v. North Carolina Prisoner Legal Services, Incorporated North Carolina Department of Corrections Franklin E. Freeman, Jr.

60 F.3d 823, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24856, 1995 WL 381902
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 28, 1995
Docket95-6428
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 60 F.3d 823 (Michael Murray v. North Carolina Prisoner Legal Services, Incorporated North Carolina Department of Corrections Franklin E. Freeman, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Michael Murray v. North Carolina Prisoner Legal Services, Incorporated North Carolina Department of Corrections Franklin E. Freeman, Jr., 60 F.3d 823, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24856, 1995 WL 381902 (4th Cir. 1995).

Opinion

60 F.3d 823
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Michael MURRAY, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
NORTH CAROLINA PRISONER LEGAL SERVICES, INCORPORATED; North
Carolina Department of Corrections; Franklin E.
Freeman, Jr., Defendants--Appellees.

No. 95-6428.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 18, 1995.
Decided: June 28, 1995.

Michael Murray, Appellant Pro Se.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Murray v. North Carolina Prisoner Legal Servs., Inc., No. CA-94-188-F (E.D.N.C. Mar. 9, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wrenn v. Freeman
894 F. Supp. 244 (E.D. North Carolina, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
60 F.3d 823, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24856, 1995 WL 381902, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-murray-v-north-carolina-prisoner-legal-ser-ca4-1995.