Michael Morales v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 16, 2014
Docket14-14-00608-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Michael Morales v. State (Michael Morales v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Michael Morales v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed September 16, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-14-00608-CR

MICHAEL MORALES, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 177th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1379169

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant was indicted for indecency with a child. Pursuant to a charge bargain, the State agreed to dismiss two pending charges in exchange for appellant’s guilty plea and waiver of right to appeal. The trial court sentenced appellant to fifteen years in prison. Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal. We dismiss the appeal. Because this is a charge-bargain case, appellant has the right to appeal under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(a)(2), only: (A) those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial, or (B) after receiving the trial court’s permission to appeal. Kennedy v. State, 297 S.W.3d 338, 340–41 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009); see also Shankle v. State, 119 S.W.3d 808, 812–13 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003) (holding that charge bargain that “effectively puts a cap on punishment” is a bargain governed by rule of appellate procedure 25.2(a)(2)). The record does not reflect the trial court’s permission to appeal or any pretrial motions that could be appealed. The trial court entered a certification of the defendant’s right to appeal in which the court certified that appellant waived his right to appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). The trial court’s certification is included in the record on appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Jamison, and Donovan. Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kennedy v. State
297 S.W.3d 338 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2009)
Shankle v. State
119 S.W.3d 808 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Michael Morales v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-morales-v-state-texapp-2014.