Michael Mirucki v. State of Florida
This text of Michael Mirucki v. State of Florida (Michael Mirucki v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
MICHAEL PAUL MIRUCKI, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 4D2025-1234
[February 26, 2026]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; William Loy Roby, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 432017CF001315A; 432018CF000399A.
Michael Paul Mirucki, South Bay, pro se.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Luke Robert Napodano, Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
GROSS, MAY and LOTT, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Michael Mirucki v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-mirucki-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2026.