Michael Mirucki v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 26, 2026·No. 4D2025-1234·Published

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

MICHAEL PAUL MIRUCKI,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D2025-1234

[February 26, 2026]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; William Loy Roby, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 432017CF001315A; 432018CF000399A.

Michael Paul Mirucki, South Bay, pro se.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Luke Robert Napodano, Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. GROSS, MAY and LOTT, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Michael Mirucki v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2026).

Michael Mirucki v. State of Florida (Michael Mirucki v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.