MICHAEL MIRAGLIA v. DANIEL PENA
This text of MICHAEL MIRAGLIA v. DANIEL PENA (MICHAEL MIRAGLIA v. DANIEL PENA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
MICHAEL MIRAGLIA, Appellant,
v.
DANIEL PENA, et al., Appellees.
No. 4D17-2712
[April 12, 2018]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Meenu Sasser, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502016CA007119XXXXMB.
Charles M-P George of the Law Offices of Charles M-P George, Gables, and Misty M. Taylor Chaves of King & Chaves, LLC, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Jack P. Hill and Adam S. Hecht of Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A., West Palm Beach, and Philip M. Burlington and Adam Richardson of Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
CIKLIN, FORST and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
MICHAEL MIRAGLIA v. DANIEL PENA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-miraglia-v-daniel-pena-fladistctapp-2018.