Michael McCloud v. Cristella Rice
This text of Michael McCloud v. Cristella Rice (Michael McCloud v. Cristella Rice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 23-1004 Doc: 16 Filed: 10/04/2023 Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 23-1004
MICHAEL MCCLOUD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CRISTELLA RICE; NEWPORT NEWS REDEVELOPMENT & HOUSING AUTHORITY,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
MARCIA L. FUDGE, Secretary of HUD; KELLY BRUNSON; STUART GARDENS ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Mark S. Davis, Chief District Judge. (4:20-cv-00004-MSD-RJK)
Submitted: September 28, 2023 Decided: October 4, 2023
Before NIEMEYER, THACKER, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. USCA4 Appeal: 23-1004 Doc: 16 Filed: 10/04/2023 Pg: 2 of 3
Michael McCloud, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew D. Meadows, JONES, BLECHMAN, WOLTZ & KELLY, PC, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2 USCA4 Appeal: 23-1004 Doc: 16 Filed: 10/04/2023 Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Michael McCloud appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to
Defendants in McCloud’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Specifically, we conclude that McCloud failed to demonstrate that
Defendants violated his due process rights as a matter of law because he had no
constitutionally protected property or liberty interest in his application for a Section 8
housing voucher. See, e.g., Phelps v. Hous. Auth. of Woodruff, 742 F.2d 816, 822-23 (4th
Cir. 1984). Defendants were therefore entitled to summary judgment on McCloud’s
claims. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Michael McCloud v. Cristella Rice, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-mccloud-v-cristella-rice-ca4-2023.