Michael Martin v. Milham Meadows I Limited Partnership

CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedMay 19, 2017
Docket154360
StatusPublished

This text of Michael Martin v. Milham Meadows I Limited Partnership (Michael Martin v. Milham Meadows I Limited Partnership) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Michael Martin v. Milham Meadows I Limited Partnership, (Mich. 2017).

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

May 19, 2017 Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

154360 Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Joan L. Larsen MICHAEL MARTIN, Kurtis T. Wilder, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices

v SC: 154360 COA: 328240 Kalamazoo CC: 2013-000485-NO MILHAM MEADOWS I LIMITED PARTNERSHIP and MEDALLION MANAGEMENT, INC., Defendants-Appellants.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 19, 2016 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other action. MCR 7.305(H)(1). The parties shall file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order addressing whether genuine issues of material fact preclude summary disposition on the plaintiff’s claim that the stairs at issue were not “fit for the use intended by the parties” and that the defendants did not keep the stairs in “reasonable repair.” MCL 554.139(1)(a) and (b). The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.

The Michigan Association for Justice, Michigan Defense Trial Counsel, Inc., and the Negligence Law Section of the State Bar of Michigan are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. May 19, 2017 t0516 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Michael Martin v. Milham Meadows I Limited Partnership, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-martin-v-milham-meadows-i-limited-partnership-mich-2017.