Michael Malone, et al., on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MICHAEL MALONE, et al., on behalf of
themselves and others similarly
situated,
Case No. 2:21-cv-03643-JDW ,
v.
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.,
.
MEMORANDUM In this case, I awarded Plaintiffs their reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs as a against UPS for its troubling discovery conduct. Yet to read UPS’s Opposition to Plaintiffs’ fee petition, one would think that Plaintiffs’ fees were the result almost entirely of their own overzealousness, not failures in the original discovery period. While some of the fees that Plaintiffs seek are excessive, the majority are appropriate and necessary to deter UPS and others from engaging in similar hide-the-ball conduct in discovery in the future. I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND On August 16, 2021, Michael Malone filed this lawsuit on behalf of himself and similarly situated UPS employees. He asserts that UPS violates the Pennsylvania Minimum Wage Act (“PMWA”) by failing to pay overtime wages associated with the time employees spend going through mandatory security screenings and walking to and from their reporting areas before and after their shifts.
Mr. Malone first moved to certify a class on January 19, 2024. In its response, UPS made clear for the first time that intended to assert an affirmative defense based on an overtime exemption under the PMWA that mirrors a Fair Labor Standards Act exemption
for employees who the Motor Carrier Act of 1935 (“MCA”) exempts. In September 2024, I held a hearing on the impact of the MCA defense on class certification that September. I determined that UPS avoided its discovery obligations and delayed this matter by “waiting until its class certification opposition to surface the MCA defense with specificity.” (ECF
No. 76 at ¶ 17.) However, rather than prevent UPS from asserting the defense at all, I reopened discovery on October 15, 2024, to permit Mr. Malone to explore the MCA defense. As a sanction, I required UPS to pay “the reasonable expenses, including attorneys’ fees, that Mr. Malone’s Counsel generate from having to test this theory anew
in a reopened discovery period.” ( ) During that time, I had multiple status conferences with the Parties regarding their discovery efforts and resolved various discovery disputes, including Plaintiffs’ Motion To
Compel. In addition, the Parties stipulated to Mr. Malone filing a First Amended Complaint that included Randy Shepler, Keri Green, Devin Whitman, and Logan Green as plaintiffs. According to Plaintiffs, they “sought to amend their complaint to add additional class representatives who did not load,” to avoid an MCA defense. (ECF No. 121-1 at 9.) However, UPS had records showing that Mr. Green and Mr. Whitman signed arbitration agreements with UPS. Thus, Plaintiffs did not oppose UPS’ motion to compel these two
Plaintiffs to arbitrate their claims. The renewed discovery period closed on May 30, 2025. After completing the briefing on class certification, Plaintiffs filed their motion for attorneys’ fees and costs incurred during reopened discovery. UPS opposes the motion,
arguing that Plaintiffs’ attorneys’ fees are unreasonable for a variety of reasons. Since then, the Parties engaged in a series of settlement efforts. While they have not been successful (yet), hope springs eternal. In the meantime, however, the time has come to resolve Plaintiffs’ motion for fees, which is ripe for disposition.
II. LEGAL STANDARD “The party seeking attorney's fees has the burden to prove that its request for attorney's fees is reasonable.” , 892 F.2d 1177, 1183 (3d Cir. 1990). “The most useful starting point for determining the amount of a reasonable fee is the
number of hours reasonably expended on the litigation multiplied by a reasonable hourly rate.” (quotation omitted). A judge “should exclude hours that are not reasonably expended” including billed time that is “excessive, redundant, or otherwise unnecessary.”
(citations omitted). “[T]he party opposing the fee award then has the burden to challenge … the reasonableness of the requested fee.” (same). The judge “has a great deal of discretion to adjust the fee award in light of those objections.” (same). In cases like this one, where a judge awards attorneys’ fees as a sanction, the policy considerations are different than a statutory fee-shifting provision.
, 857 F.2d 191, 196 (3d Cir. 1988). In the sanctions context, the judge should approve no more than “the that will serve to deter the undesirable behavior.” at 194 (quotation omitted) (original emphasis). Thus, “the
deterrent effect of an award of attorney's fees depends on the extent of the sanctioned party's resources.” at 195-96. III. ANALYSIS Because UPS does not challenge the reasonableness of Plaintiffs’ Counsel’s hourly
rates, I confine my analysis to whether their hours were “reasonably expended.” Most, but not all, were. The approved and unapproved fees are set forth in Exhibit 1 to this Memorandum, reflecting any reductions that I deem appropriate, as set forth below. A. Attorneys’ Fees
1. Settlement communications and arbitration As an initial matter, because I awarded Plaintiffs their reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs associated with having to reopen discovery for purposes of exploring the MCA
defense, there is no dispute that Plaintiffs cannot recover amounts associated with unrelated activities, such as settlement communications and arbitration issues. This includes the fees and costs associated with depositions of Mr. Green and Mr. Whitman and 33% of the fees and costs associated with the deposition of Jean Ditmars. I will also exclude 30 minutes of billable time for the portion of a meet-and-confer on November 21, 2024, at which the Parties had settlement discussions. I will not offset Plaintiffs’ total
recovery based on the time UPS’s Counsel spent on settlement or arbitration-related work, which is a natural consequence of UPS’s assertion of the MCA defense. 2. Block billing and redacted time entries
The mere fact that Plaintiffs’ Counsel utilized block billing for some portion of their time entries is not a sufficient reason to reject Plaintiffs’ request to recover those fees altogether. “Block billing is a common practice which itself saves time in that the attorney summarizes activities rather than detailing every task.”
, 54 F. Supp.2d 410, 415 (M.D. Pa. 1999). I do not need “to know the number of minutes spent nor the activity to which each hour was devoted” to assess Plaintiffs’ motion. , 892 F.2d at 1190 (quotation omitted) (emphasis added). Instead, the fee petition just needs to be “specific enough to allow [me]
‘to determine if the hours claimed are unreasonable for the work performed.’” (same). That remains true even though private clients like UPS might demand more precision from their counsel for their own bills. However, block billing “is not [an] ideal time keeping
method and lawyers who use it do so at their ‘own peril.’ If a block entry is confusing or makes it difficult to allocate reasonable time to a specific task, ‘the blame lies on the party seeking fees because they were in the best position to mitigate any confusion.’” , No. 09-cv-646, 2010 WL 3734547, at *5 (E.D. Pa. Sept. 23, 2010) (quotations omitted).
In their reply—and subject to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11(b)—Plaintiffs’ Counsel represented that the various activities contained in a single time entry are “interrelated and involved the same general workstreams.” (ECF No. 123 at 7.) I am willing
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MICHAEL MALONE, et al., on behalf of
themselves and others similarly
situated,
Case No. 2:21-cv-03643-JDW ,
v.
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC.,
.
MEMORANDUM In this case, I awarded Plaintiffs their reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs as a against UPS for its troubling discovery conduct. Yet to read UPS’s Opposition to Plaintiffs’ fee petition, one would think that Plaintiffs’ fees were the result almost entirely of their own overzealousness, not failures in the original discovery period. While some of the fees that Plaintiffs seek are excessive, the majority are appropriate and necessary to deter UPS and others from engaging in similar hide-the-ball conduct in discovery in the future. I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND On August 16, 2021, Michael Malone filed this lawsuit on behalf of himself and similarly situated UPS employees. He asserts that UPS violates the Pennsylvania Minimum Wage Act (“PMWA”) by failing to pay overtime wages associated with the time employees spend going through mandatory security screenings and walking to and from their reporting areas before and after their shifts.
Mr. Malone first moved to certify a class on January 19, 2024. In its response, UPS made clear for the first time that intended to assert an affirmative defense based on an overtime exemption under the PMWA that mirrors a Fair Labor Standards Act exemption
for employees who the Motor Carrier Act of 1935 (“MCA”) exempts. In September 2024, I held a hearing on the impact of the MCA defense on class certification that September. I determined that UPS avoided its discovery obligations and delayed this matter by “waiting until its class certification opposition to surface the MCA defense with specificity.” (ECF
No. 76 at ¶ 17.) However, rather than prevent UPS from asserting the defense at all, I reopened discovery on October 15, 2024, to permit Mr. Malone to explore the MCA defense. As a sanction, I required UPS to pay “the reasonable expenses, including attorneys’ fees, that Mr. Malone’s Counsel generate from having to test this theory anew
in a reopened discovery period.” ( ) During that time, I had multiple status conferences with the Parties regarding their discovery efforts and resolved various discovery disputes, including Plaintiffs’ Motion To
Compel. In addition, the Parties stipulated to Mr. Malone filing a First Amended Complaint that included Randy Shepler, Keri Green, Devin Whitman, and Logan Green as plaintiffs. According to Plaintiffs, they “sought to amend their complaint to add additional class representatives who did not load,” to avoid an MCA defense. (ECF No. 121-1 at 9.) However, UPS had records showing that Mr. Green and Mr. Whitman signed arbitration agreements with UPS. Thus, Plaintiffs did not oppose UPS’ motion to compel these two
Plaintiffs to arbitrate their claims. The renewed discovery period closed on May 30, 2025. After completing the briefing on class certification, Plaintiffs filed their motion for attorneys’ fees and costs incurred during reopened discovery. UPS opposes the motion,
arguing that Plaintiffs’ attorneys’ fees are unreasonable for a variety of reasons. Since then, the Parties engaged in a series of settlement efforts. While they have not been successful (yet), hope springs eternal. In the meantime, however, the time has come to resolve Plaintiffs’ motion for fees, which is ripe for disposition.
II. LEGAL STANDARD “The party seeking attorney's fees has the burden to prove that its request for attorney's fees is reasonable.” , 892 F.2d 1177, 1183 (3d Cir. 1990). “The most useful starting point for determining the amount of a reasonable fee is the
number of hours reasonably expended on the litigation multiplied by a reasonable hourly rate.” (quotation omitted). A judge “should exclude hours that are not reasonably expended” including billed time that is “excessive, redundant, or otherwise unnecessary.”
(citations omitted). “[T]he party opposing the fee award then has the burden to challenge … the reasonableness of the requested fee.” (same). The judge “has a great deal of discretion to adjust the fee award in light of those objections.” (same). In cases like this one, where a judge awards attorneys’ fees as a sanction, the policy considerations are different than a statutory fee-shifting provision.
, 857 F.2d 191, 196 (3d Cir. 1988). In the sanctions context, the judge should approve no more than “the that will serve to deter the undesirable behavior.” at 194 (quotation omitted) (original emphasis). Thus, “the
deterrent effect of an award of attorney's fees depends on the extent of the sanctioned party's resources.” at 195-96. III. ANALYSIS Because UPS does not challenge the reasonableness of Plaintiffs’ Counsel’s hourly
rates, I confine my analysis to whether their hours were “reasonably expended.” Most, but not all, were. The approved and unapproved fees are set forth in Exhibit 1 to this Memorandum, reflecting any reductions that I deem appropriate, as set forth below. A. Attorneys’ Fees
1. Settlement communications and arbitration As an initial matter, because I awarded Plaintiffs their reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs associated with having to reopen discovery for purposes of exploring the MCA
defense, there is no dispute that Plaintiffs cannot recover amounts associated with unrelated activities, such as settlement communications and arbitration issues. This includes the fees and costs associated with depositions of Mr. Green and Mr. Whitman and 33% of the fees and costs associated with the deposition of Jean Ditmars. I will also exclude 30 minutes of billable time for the portion of a meet-and-confer on November 21, 2024, at which the Parties had settlement discussions. I will not offset Plaintiffs’ total
recovery based on the time UPS’s Counsel spent on settlement or arbitration-related work, which is a natural consequence of UPS’s assertion of the MCA defense. 2. Block billing and redacted time entries
The mere fact that Plaintiffs’ Counsel utilized block billing for some portion of their time entries is not a sufficient reason to reject Plaintiffs’ request to recover those fees altogether. “Block billing is a common practice which itself saves time in that the attorney summarizes activities rather than detailing every task.”
, 54 F. Supp.2d 410, 415 (M.D. Pa. 1999). I do not need “to know the number of minutes spent nor the activity to which each hour was devoted” to assess Plaintiffs’ motion. , 892 F.2d at 1190 (quotation omitted) (emphasis added). Instead, the fee petition just needs to be “specific enough to allow [me]
‘to determine if the hours claimed are unreasonable for the work performed.’” (same). That remains true even though private clients like UPS might demand more precision from their counsel for their own bills. However, block billing “is not [an] ideal time keeping
method and lawyers who use it do so at their ‘own peril.’ If a block entry is confusing or makes it difficult to allocate reasonable time to a specific task, ‘the blame lies on the party seeking fees because they were in the best position to mitigate any confusion.’” , No. 09-cv-646, 2010 WL 3734547, at *5 (E.D. Pa. Sept. 23, 2010) (quotations omitted).
In their reply—and subject to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11(b)—Plaintiffs’ Counsel represented that the various activities contained in a single time entry are “interrelated and involved the same general workstreams.” (ECF No. 123 at 7.) I am willing
to credit that representation. However, if certain block entries contain tasks that I deem redundant or otherwise non-compensable, then I will deduct the full fee associated with that entry, as there is no way for me to determine how much time an attorney spent on the non-compensable activity. For example, if an entry includes work done towards
settlement or arbitration issues—which all Parties agree is non-compensable—I will exclude all time associated with that entry. Likewise, the mere fact that Plaintiffs’ Counsel redacted certain time entries so as not to reveal privileged material or attorney work product is not a reason to deny
Plaintiffs’ request to recover all those fees. However, due to the redactions, some of Counsel’s billing entries are as impossible to assess as those in , 903 F.3d 396 (3d Cir. 2018). In that case, the Third Circuit disallowed
time entries “for ‘Attorney review,’ ‘Analysis/Strategy,’ or ‘Review/analyze’ with no additional explanation regarding the subject or necessity of the review.” , 903 F.3d at 401. Some of the time entries here are just as vague, including: “attendance at [redacted],” “conference with [redacted],” “talk to [redacted],” and “draft [redacted].” (ECF No. 122-27.) In fact, some entries are redacted , leaving me with indication what work was performed, making it impossible to determine whether the time spent on this
activity—whatever it was—was reasonable. Thus, I will exclude the time for entries like these, and others, that are “nowhere near specific enough.” , 903 F.3d at 401. Plaintiffs have offered to make their unredacted time entries available to me to
review “upon request” for review, (ECF No. 121-1 at 15), but there are at least two problems with that suggestion. , it foists unnecessary work onto me. Rather than redact the time entries at issue, Plaintiffs’ Counsel should have revised them in such a way that both UPS and I would have a general sense of the work performed. This is the sort of
thing that attorneys do every day when preparing privilege logs, and there is no reason Plaintiffs’ Counsel could not have prepared better descriptions in their billing entries before filing them. , an review keeps UPS in the dark, preventing it from challenging the reasonableness of the time expended. When I sanctioned UPS for failing
to assert its MCA defense during discovery, I awarded Plaintiffs their attorneys’ fees and costs. It was not a carte blanche award. Bearing the burden of establishing the reasonableness of the fees they seek to collect, Plaintiffs had to put their
best foot forward in their fee petition, especially where they had ample time to prepare it. I will not give them a second bite at the apple now. 3. Legal research and internal conferences Plaintiffs’ Counsel spent a significant amount of time conducting legal research
during the reopened discovery period and conferring among themselves regarding the case. Because of the block-billing, it is difficult to parse out exactly how much time Counsel spent researching and having internal discussions. Thus, when UPS complains
that Plaintiffs’ Counsel spent 384 hours on internal conferences and 207 hours on legal research, those numbers are not accurate because the time entries include numerous other tasks. I have reviewed Counsel’s time entries. Considering the time billed for multiple tasks, most of the time entries are reasonable. However, there are a few instances
in which internal discussions or team meetings lasted more than an hour, which is excessive. Thus, for any conferences longer than that, I will limit the recovery to 1 hour. Finally, UPS offers no basis beyond rank speculation that the alleged “blatant excess in Plaintiffs’ purported fees” suggests that Plaintiffs’ Counsel are seeking to collect
fees for time spent on a different matter in a different court: , No. 23-cv- 04953 (DNJ). (ECF No. 122 at 4.) To lodge such a serious accusation against Plaintiffs’ Counsel, one would expect UPS to come forward with something more than its own
supposition. But UPS offers nothing. This unsupported argument goes well beyond the bounds of zealous advocacy and has no place in a brief before this Court. 4. The First Amended Complaint The fees related to Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) are reasonable. In
total, Plaintiffs’ Counsel spent 17.5 hours: drafting, revising, finalizing, and filing the FAC;1 drafting a motion to amend,2 drafting correspondence to opposing Counsel and the Court; meeting and conferring with Defense Counsel regarding the proposed amendment
(including agreeing to a stipulation to amend); and discussing (and presumably strategizing) regarding these various issues. That amount of time is not excessive for these various tasks. 5. Partner time
UPS’s complaint about the way Plaintiffs’ Counsel staffed this case is unmoving. Given the contingent nature of any recovery, plaintiff-side staffing tends to look different than defense work at larger firms with paying clients. And I will not take UPS’s invitation to micromanage or second-guess how Plaintiffs’ Counsel (and their respective firms)
allocated resources or assigned various tasks. UPS asks me to strike “all time relating to traditionally associate work” without telling me which tasks it deems to be such. (ECF No. 122 at 7.) I will not do UPS’s work for it. Nor will I take UPS’s other suggestion to discount
1 Because the redline version of the FAC reflects the final revisions only, it does not reveal the full extent of the editing process. Thus, what appear to be minimal changes in the final FAC may not reflect the actual amount of work that went into the FAC’s preparation. 2 UPS complains that Plaintiffs never filed the motion to amend. Of course, Plaintiffs had no way to know whether UPS would consent to amendment, so it was not unreasonable for them to prepare a motion to amend just in case. Plaintiffs’ Counsel’s time by 50%, as that figure is not tethered to any reasonable measure.3
In addition, because three separate firms are representing Plaintiffs in this matter, it is natural and expected for attorneys across those firms to review each other’s submissions to the Court and provide comments and edits. None of the editing time that
UPS challenges as excessive is unreasonable, so I will not exclude it. 6. Peter Winebrake’s time Peter Winebrake served in an advisory capacity and provided Plaintiffs’ Counsel with strategic guidance based on “his extensive experience” litigating these types of large
wage and hour cases. (ECF No. 123 at 7.) Over the course of the 7-month reopened discovery period, Mr. Winebrake billed just 21.7 hours. After excluding his time entries that pertain to arbitration issues, the remaining time is reasonable. 7. Excessive attorney attendance
Whether attorney time is reasonably expended is fact-specific and may turn on a variety of factors such as the nature of the case, the task at hand, and the amount at stake in the litigation. As such, whether attorney time was excessive or redundant is not subject
to brightline limitations. In this case, there was no need for more than one attorney to bill for the same deposition, and Plaintiffs fail to offer any explanation as to why it was
3 Indeed, even UPS’s most junior associate on this case bills more than 60% of the rate for UPS’s lead counsel. And UPS’s most junior associate on this matter bills at a far higher rate than any of Plaintiffs’ Counsel. reasonable. At the same time, UPS does not explain why it was unreasonable to have a paralegal assisting the attorney taking the deposition. And I do not find a paralegal’s
presence at depositions in this case to be problematic. Thus, I will exclude any time entries for attorneys who did not take or defend the depositions themselves. In addition, absent any explanation from Plaintiffs that the deposing or defending attorneys relied on
preparation materials from other attorneys, I will also exclude any preparation work by the attorneys who did not take or defend the depositions at issue. There are similar concerns regarding attorney appearances at Court hearings and conferences and the meet and confers with UPS’s Counsel. There is no reason why the
entire team needed to attend these events. Thus, I will limit these events to two time- keepers only. 8. Administrative tasks “Purely clerical or secretarial tasks should not be billed …, regardless of who
performs them.” , 491 U.S. 274, 288 n.10 (1989). At the same time, however, attorneys and paralegals rarely perform tasks that are administrative in nature. It is standard—and often necessary—for attorneys and paralegals to undertake
some administrative matters to complete their legal work in an efficient and time-sensitive manner. Most of the administrative tasks with which UPS takes issue fall into that category. However, there are some entries that appear to be purely clerical in nature, and Plaintiffs may not recover fees for that time. In addition, the four hours that Santiago Kling billed to prepare four identical deposition notices is excessive, and I will reduce that time to 1 hour.4
9. The Woodruff deposition UPS has not demonstrated that Plaintiffs’ deposition of Angie Woodruff was frivolous. Even if UPS advised Plaintiffs that Ms. Woodruff had “no involvement in or
knowledge of the MCA exemption” (ECF No. 122-1 at 11), Plaintiffs were not required to take UPS’s word for it, and they could take her deposition to verify that assertion. In addition, the fact that Ms. Woodruff’s deposition took nearly 7 hours suggests that even if she has no knowledge of the MCA exemption, she had some discoverable information
to provide. Thus, it was reasonable for a single attorney to bill for her deposition,5 and no offset is appropriate. 10. Renewed motion for class certification Plaintiffs’ Counsel spent an excessive amount of time preparing the renewed
motion for class certification following the reopened discovery period. Indeed, the brief in support of the renewed motion was not much different than their original opening brief on class certification, and Plaintiffs chose to address the impact of the MCA defense in
4 UPS complains that Mr. Santiago appears to have rounded his time entries to the nearest half hour. Certainly, there are legal professionals who bill this way. While it may no longer be the norm, UPS has not convinced me that this billing practice is unreasonable. 5 As set forth above, I will not permit Plaintiffs to recover fees for more than one attorney to attend a deposition. their reply brief only. Because the MCA issue was the driving force behind the reopened discovery period, I will eliminate the time Plaintiffs’ Counsel spent on the opening class
certification brief, which is silent on the MCA issue. 11. Class certification reply brief and motion to strike Had Plaintiffs’ Counsel actually spent 128 hours drafting their reply brief, such time
would be “monumentally excessive,” as UPS contends. (ECF No.122 at 19.) But that figure is not accurate. Again, UPS points to an inflated figure, knowing that because Plaintiffs’ Counsel utilized block billing, there are a variety of related tasks included in this figure. As everyone involved in this case knows, the MCA defense is a critical issue for all Parties,
which is why I reopened discovery to ensure that the Parties had a full opportunity to explore the MCA’s impact on this matter. And the motion for class certification is a pivotal event in the life of large class action. Indeed, many such cases rise or fall depending on a class certification decision. Thus, it makes sense that Plaintiffs’ Counsel devoted a
significant amount of time responding to UPS’s MCA arguments. While high, the fees are not unreasonable. The same is true with respect to the fees associated with Plaintiff’s motion to strike.
The motion was not an attempt at an end run around the page limits I impose on reply briefs. While Plaintiffs did repeat some of their arguments as to why I should strike the MCA defense in its entirety, that was not the focus of their brief. Instead, they raised genuine concerns about UPS’s conduct during the renewed discovery period. Again, though Plaintiffs’ Counsel spent a significant amount of time on this motion, that time was not unreasonable, so I will not reduce it.
12. Erroneous time entries I will reduce or exclude the following erroneous time entries as follows: • I will reduce the 31.5 hours that Sarah Schalman-Bergen billed for deposition preparation on a single day (May 6, 2025) to 8 hours ( ECF No. 122-2 at page 22);
• I will exclude the .5 hours for Everlaw training ( at page 13);
• I will exclude the 16 hours that Santiago Kling billed to prepare trial binders ( at pages 36-38);6 and
• I will reduce the 21.9 hours that Ms. Schalman-Bergen billed on a single day (July 25, 2025) to 8 hours ( at page 42). 13. Interrogatory dispute The fact that I did not permit Plaintiffs to serve each additional interrogatory above the applicable limit is not a reason to deny their Counsel the full extent of their fees in connection with this issue. Indeed, I permitted Plaintiffs to serve a few additional interrogatories, so it was worth it for their Counsel to pursue this discovery. Thus, I will not reduce the time associated with their efforts and the related disputes.
6 This task is also excludable as purely administrative in nature. 14. Fee petition fees After removing non-drafting attorneys’ time editing the drafter’s work product, the
time spent preparing the instant fee petition is reasonable, and I will not reduce it further.7 Thus, taking into account all of my reductions set forth above, Plaintiffs’ Counsel are entitled to $499,749.50 in reasonable attorneys’ fees.
B. Other expenses Despite bearing the burden of establishing reasonableness, Plaintiffs have failed to justify the following expenses out of the total $27,773.18 sought: • $4,519.88 in costs associated with Mr. Green’s, Mr. Whitman’s, and 1/3 of Ms. Ditmars’s depositions;
• $606.05 for rough deposition transcripts;8
• $3,719.69 for legal research;
• $1,800.50 for document-hosting costs;
• $377.97 in shipping costs “to prepare for hearings and briefing” (ECF No. 123 at 10); and
• $79.20 late fee associated with Ms. Green’s deposition transcript.
7 Given the amount of time that UPS must have spent on challenging Plaintiffs’ fee petition, this argument is not well-taken. 8 Many of the depositions took place at the very end of discovery, right before Plaintiffs’ renewed motion for class certification was due. Given the timing, I indicated that Plaintiffs should order expedited transcripts, if necessary to adhere to the deadline for the renewed motion. Plaintiffs may recover costs for a rough transcript an expedited transcript, but not both. Thus, I will deduct the costs for a rough transcript if Plaintiffs also ordered an expedited version. This includes the rough transcripts for Bryan Schouman’s, James Palmer’s, and Brian Speller’s (continued) depositions. Thus, I will exclude these costs from Plaintiffs’ recovery. As such, Plaintiffs’ Counsel may recover $16,669.89 for their reasonable expenses.
IV. CONCLUSION Though some of Plaintiffs’ Counsel’s fees and expenses are not warranted, most of them are, and I do not need to hold an evidentiary hearing to make that determination.
Indeed, UPS cannot skirt its sanctions by nitpicking every single bill. Thus, I will grant Plaintiffs’ motion for fees. An appropriate Order follows. BY THE COURT:
JOSHUA D. WOLSON, J.
September 15, 2026 Case 2:21-cv-03643-JDW Document 149 Filed 09/15/26 Page 17 of 60
Exhibit 1 Case 2:21-cv-03643-JDW Document 149 Filed 09/15/26 Page 18 of 60 Approved Fees A B C D E F G 1 Firm Timekeeper Date Description Time Rate Fees 2 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2024-10-02 REV order re MCA exemption and discuss with PDW. 0.3 $525.00 $157.50 3 W&S Peter Winebrake 2024-10-02 PC w/ DAA re today's decision re Pennypack issue. 0.2 $840.00 $168.00 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2024-10-03 REV draft correspondence with DEFCSL re scheduling, prior scheduling order, and 0.2 $525.00 $105.00 4 email COCSL re same. 5 LLR Krysten Connon 2024-10-03 Draft schedule for next phase of discovery; confer with SSB re same 1.3 $525.00 $682.50 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2024-10-03 Confer with KC re [REDACTED] 0.2 $645.00 $129.00 6 7 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2024-10-04 VAR emails with COCSL re discovery schedule proposal. 0.1 $525.00 $52.50 8 LLR Krysten Connon 2024-10-04 Confer with team re draft schedule; circulate draft to opposing counsel 0.5 $525.00 $262.50 W&S Peter Winebrake 2024-10-04 Rev court's order/opinion denying class cert w/o prejudice and re-opening discovery 0.2 $840.00 $168.00 9 re MCA defense. LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2024-10-04 Confer with team re [REDACTED] 0.3 $645.00 $193.50 10 11 LLR Krysten Connon 2024-10-06 Confer with SSB re [REDACTED]; email opposing counsel 0.1 $525.00 $52.50 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2024-10-06 Confer with KC re: [REDACTED] 0.1 $645.00 $64.50 12 13 LLR Krysten Connon 2024-10-08 Call with case team re [REDACTED] 0.5 $525.00 $262.50 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2024-10-08 Call with case team re [REDACTED] 0.5 $645.00 $322.50 14 15 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2024-10-09 PC with COCSL, RAS re: discovery on MCA exemption. 0.5 $525.00 $262.50 16 LLR Krysten Connon 2024-10-09 Prepare for and participate in call with opposing counsel re discovery 0.6 $525.00 $315.00 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2024-10-09 Call with opposint [sic] counsel re discovery 0.5 $645.00 $322.50 17 18 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2024-10-10 PC with COCSL re schedule for MCA discovery. 0.2 $525.00 $105.00 LLR Krysten Connon 2024-10-10 Confer with SSB and case team re [REDACTED]; review email from opposing 0.7 $525.00 $367.50 19 counsel; draft and send email to opposing counsel re same LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2024-10-10 Confer with KC and team re [REDACTED] 0.5 $645.00 $322.50 20 21 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2024-10-11 VAR emails re schedule for MCA discovery. 0.2 $525.00 $105.00 LLR Krysten Connon 2024-10-11 Confer with SSB and case team re [REDACTED]; finalize draft schedule with 0.8 $525.00 $420.00 22 opposing counsel and submit same to [BLANK] WWD Ryan Hancock 2024-10-11 REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE FROM ALL COUNSEL RE: PROPOSED DISCOVERY 0.2 $585.00 $117.00 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2024-10-11 Confer with KC and case team re [REDACTED] 0.3 $645.00 $193.50 24 25 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2024-10-21 Initial REV of def supplemental discovery responses. 0.2 $525.00 $105.00 26 W&S Peter Winebrake 2024-10-21 Rev new scheduling order and make sure dlns entered in Filevine. 0.1 $840.00 $84.00 27 LLR Krysten Connon 2024-10-25 Draft discovery requests 1.5 $525.00 $787.50 Entries in red have been reduced. Case 2:21-cv-03643-JDW Document 149 Filed 09/15/26 Page 19 of 60 Approved Fees A B C D E F G 28 LLR Krysten Connon 2024-10-25 Conduct research re MCA 2.0 $525.00 $1,050.00 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2024-10-25 Confer with KC re: [REDACTED] review and edit discovery requests; research MCA 1.1 $645.00 $709.50 29 30 LLR Krysten Connon 2024-10-28 Draft discovery requests 2.0 $525.00 $1,050.00 31 LLR Krysten Connon 2024-10-28 Conduct research around Motor Carrier Act 2.1 $525.00 $1,102.50 WWD Brian Shmerling 2024-10-29 LEGAL RESEARCH RE [REDACTED] AND LEGAL RESEARCH RE [REDACTED]S 8.5 $250.00 $2,125.00 32 33 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2024-10-29 PC with SSB, KC re strategy for supplemental discovery requests. 0.2 $525.00 $105.00 34 LLR Krysten Connon 2024-10-29 Conduct research around Motor Carrier Act 0.9 $525.00 $472.50 35 LLR Krysten Connon 2024-10-29 Draft discovery requests 3.0 $525.00 $1,575.00 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2024-10-29 Research MCA 1.3 $645.00 $838.50 36 37 WWD Brian Shmerling 2024-10-30 LEGAL RESEARCH RE [REDACTED] 3.7 $250.00 $925.00 38 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2024-10-30 REV draft supplemental MCA requests. 0.3 $525.00 $157.50 WWD Brian Shmerling 2024-10-31 REVIEW OF PLAINTIFFS DRAFT DISCOVERY REQUESTS; PREPARATION OF 2.0 $250.00 $500.00 CORRESPONDENCE TO KRYSTEN CONNON RE SAME; TELEPHONE CONFERENCE 39 WITH LLR RE [REDACTED] 40 WWD Brian Shmerling 2024-10-31 LEGAL RESEARCH RE [REDACTED] 3.5 $250.00 $875.00 WWD Brian Shmerling 2024-11-01 REVIEW OF REVISED INTERROGATORIES AND REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION; 0.8 $250.00 $200.00 TELEPHONE CONFERENCE WITH KRYSTEN CONNON RE SAME 41 42 WWD Brian Shmerling 2024-11-01 LEGAL RESEARCH RE: [REDACTED] 0.8 $250.00 $200.00 43 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2024-11-01 PC with KC re MCA discovery requests. 0.2 $525.00 $105.00 44 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2024-11-01 REV updated draft discovery requests re MCA and email COCSL re same. 0.6 $525.00 $315.00 45 LLR Krysten Connon 2024-11-01 Finalize discovery requests and confer with case team around same 3.5 $525.00 $1,837.50 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2024-11-01 Review and edit discovery requests and confer with KC re: same 0.2 $645.00 $129.00 46 47 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2024-11-18 VAR emails re scheduling call with DEFCSL. 0.1 $525.00 $52.50 48 LLR Krysten Connon 2024-11-20 Review UPS's discovery responses 1.9 $525.00 $997.50 WWD Brian Shmerling 2024-11-21 REVIEW OF DEFENDANTS PROPOSED RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS SUPPLEMENTAL 5.6 $250.00 $1,400.00 DISCOVERY REQUESTS; TELEPHONE CONFERENCE WITH COCOUNSEL RE SAME; TELEPHONE CONFERENCE WITH ALL COUNSEL RE DISCOVERY 49 50 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2024-11-21 PC with COCSL re DEF discovery responses, planning for call with DEFCSL. 0.5 $525.00 $262.50 51 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2024-11-21 REV def MCA discovery responses. 0.5 $525.00 $262.50 52 LLR Krysten Connon 2024-11-21 Confer with SSB re [REDACTED] 0.9 $525.00 $472.50 53 LLR Krysten Connon 2024-11-21 Team call re [REDACTED] 0.5 $525.00 $262.50 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2024-11-21 Confer with KConnon re: [REDACTED] 0.9 $645.00 $580.50 54 Entries in red have been reduced. Case 2:21-cv-03643-JDW Document 149 Filed 09/15/26 Page 20 of 60 Approved Fees A B C D E F G LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2024-11-21 Team call re [REDACTED] 0.5 $645.00 $322.50 55 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2024-11-21 Prep for meet and confer call 1.6 $645.00 $1,032.00 56 57 LLR Krysten Connon 2024-11-21 Meet and confer regarding discovery responses 2.5 $525.00 $1,312.50 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2024-11-21 Meet and confer call 2.5 $645.00 $1,612.50 58 59 LLR Krysten Connon 2024-11-22 Conduct research [REDACTED] 2.5 $525.00 $1,312.50 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2024-11-22 Confer with KConnon re: [REDACTED] 0.1 $645.00 $64.50 60 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2024-11-22 confer with RHancock re: [REDACTED] 0.1 $645.00 $64.50 61 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2024-11-22 Review caselaw cited by defendant in support of withholding declarant information 0.3 $645.00 $193.50 62 LLR Krysten Connon 2024-11-25 Review correspondence from opposing counsel re [REDACTED]; confer with SSB re 0.2 $525.00 $105.00 63 same LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2024-11-25 review corr from defense re: discovery responses; confer with KConnon re: 0.2 $645.00 $129.00 64 [REDACTED] 65 LLR Krysten Connon 2024-11-26 Confer with SSB 0.1 $525.00 $52.50 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2024-11-26 Confer with KC re: [REDACTED] 0.1 $645.00 $64.50 66 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2024-11-26 Review meet and confer correspondence 0.2 $645.00 $129.00 67 68 LLR Krysten Connon 2024-12-02 Draft response to meet and confer email; discuss same with SSB 0.9 $525.00 $472.50 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2024-12-02 Confer with KConnon re: [REDACTED]; review and edit same 0.1 $645.00 $64.50 69 70 WWD Brian Shmerling 2024-12-05 REVIEW OF PROPOSED DISCOVERY INSUFFICIENCY LETTER 0.2 $250.00 $50.00 71 LLR Krysten Connon 2024-12-05 Develop strategy re responding to meet and confer email 0.2 $525.00 $105.00 72 LLR Krysten Connon 2024-12-06 Attempt to open document production 0.2 $525.00 $105.00 73 WWD Ryan Hancock 2024-12-06 REVIEW OF DEFENDANTS RESPONSES AND OBJECTIONS 0.2 $585.00 $117.00 74 WWD Brian Shmerling 2024-12-09 REVIEW OF DEFENDANTS INITIAL PRODUCTION 1.3 $250.00 $325.00 75 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2024-12-09 PC with PDW re case status and MCA discovery 0.2 $525.00 $105.00 76 LLR Krysten Connon 2024-12-09 Review documents produced 0.5 $525.00 $262.50 LLR Krysten Connon 2024-12-09 Draft meet and confer email re ESI discovery and other topics; develop strategy re 1.0 $525.00 $525.00 77 same 78 W&S Peter Winebrake 2024-12-09 PC w/ DAA re [REDACTED] 0.2 $840.00 $168.00 WWD Brian Shmerling 2024-12-10 REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE FROM KRYSTEN CONNON RE [REDACTED]; 0.8 $250.00 $200.00 PREPARATION OF CORRESPONDENCE TO KRYSTON CONNON RE SAME 79 Entries in red have been reduced. Case 2:21-cv-03643-JDW Document 149 Filed 09/15/26 Page 21 of 60 Approved Fees A B C D E F G 80 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2024-12-10 VAR emails with COCSL re discovery disputes. 0.1 $525.00 $52.50 81 LLR Krysten Connon 2024-12-10 Revise draft meet and confer email; confer with team re same 0.3 $525.00 $157.50 82 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2024-12-11 VAR emails re MCA discovery disputes. 0.1 $525.00 $52.50 83 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2024-12-11 Prelim REV of DEF supp production. 0.3 $525.00 $157.50 84 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2024-12-12 REV draft correspondence to court re discovery disputes. 0.1 $525.00 $52.50 LLR Krysten Connon 2024-12-12 Draft email to court re ESI and dispute re interrogatories; confer with SSB re same 0.7 $525.00 $367.50 85 86 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2024-12-13 Emails with COCSL re MCA discovery dispute. 0.1 $525.00 $52.50 LLR Krysten Connon 2024-12-13 Draft correspondence to Court; discuss [REDACTED]; exchange drafts with 2.7 $525.00 $1,417.50 87 opposing counsel 88 WWD Ryan Hancock 2024-12-13 REVIEW OF PROPOSED RESPONSE RE: ESI DISCOVERY DISPUTE 0.2 $585.00 $117.00 89 LLR Krysten Connon 2024-12-16 Confer with SSB re discovery in advance of court confernce 0.5 $525.00 $262.50 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2024-12-16 Review joint letter to court and prepare for court hearing 0.7 $645.00 $451.50 90 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2024-12-16 Confer with KC re [REDACTED] 0.5 $645.00 $322.50 91 92 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2024-12-17 REV final submission to court re MCA discovery disputes. 0.2 $525.00 $105.00 93 LLR Krysten Connon 2024-12-17 Prepare for and participate in court conference 1.7 $525.00 $892.50 94 LLR Krysten Connon 2024-12-17 Draft meet and confer correspondence 0.2 $525.00 $105.00 W&S Peter Winebrake 2024-12-17 Read correspondence and let to judge underlying today's court conference; pc w/ 0.5 $840.00 $420.00 95 DAA re| LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2024-12-17 Prepare for and participate in status call with the court 1.9 $645.00 $1,225.50 96 97 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2024-12-18 REV order and calendar deadlines. 0.1 $525.00 $52.50 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2024-12-18 Prepare for and participate in meet and confer call 1.1 $645.00 $709.50 98 99 WWD Ryan Hancock 2024-12-18 ATTENDANCE AT ZOOM ESI MEET AND CONFER 0.5 $585.00 $292.50 100 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2024-12-18 Conferral call with DEFCSL re ESI. 0.5 $525.00 $262.50 WWD Brian Shmerling 2024-12-19 REVIEW OF REVISION OF PLAINTIFF REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION; PREPARATION 0.7 $250.00 $175.00 101 OF CORRESPONDENCE TO KRYSTEN CONNON RE: SAME 102 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2024-12-19 REV revisions to interrogatories. 0.1 $525.00 $52.50 103 LLR Krysten Connon 2024-12-19 Develop proposal for limiting interrogatories 0.7 $525.00 $367.50 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2024-12-19 Review interrogatories for limitations required by court and confer with KC Re: same 0.3 $645.00 $193.50 104 105 LLR Krysten Connon 2024-12-20 Confirm withdrawal of interrogatories 0.2 $525.00 $105.00 106 LLR Krysten Connon 2024-12-20 Review documents produced 0.7 $525.00 $367.50 107 LLR Krysten Connon 2024-12-20 Meet and confer with opposing counsel re ESI and follow up 0.8 $525.00 $420.00 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2024-12-20 Meet and confer call with defense re: ESI protocol and follow up re: same 0.8 $645.00 $516.00 108 Entries in red have been reduced. Case 2:21-cv-03643-JDW Document 149 Filed 09/15/26 Page 22 of 60 Approved Fees A B C D E F G 109 LLR Krysten Connon 2024-12-21 Develop ESI proposal 2.2 $525.00 $1,155.00 W&S Peter Winebrake 2024-12-21 Rev ct order entered after this week's hearing; catch-up entry for var calls this week 0.3 $840.00 $252.00 110 w/ DAA re [REDACTED] and fo rev of many emails re same. 111 LLR Krysten Connon 2024-12-23 Conferrals over email re [REDACTED]s; confer with team re same 2.4 $525.00 $1,260.00 112 WWD Ryan Hancock 2024-12-23 ATTENDANCE AT ZOOM RE: ESI PROTOCOL 0.4 $585.00 $234.00 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2024-12-23 Meet and confer call re: ESI; confer with KConnon re: same 0.4 $645.00 $258.00 113 114 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-01-06 Email opposing counsel re [REDACTED]; confer internally re same 0.2 $525.00 $105.00 115 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-01-10 REV draft letter to court and email COCSL re same. 0.1 $525.00 $52.50 116 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-01-10 Call with opposing counsel re ESI; edit proposed joint letter 0.7 $525.00 $367.50 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-01-10 Review and edit proposed joint letter; confer with KC re: same 0.2 $645.00 $129.00 117 118 WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-01-10 ATTENDANCE AT ZOOM ALL COUNSEL MEET AND CONFER 0.5 $585.00 $292.50 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-01-10 Meet and confer with OC re: ESI Protocol and deposition dates 0.5 $645.00 $322.50 119 120 W&S Peter Winebrake 2025-01-13 Rev joint letter to ct re discovery din, etc. 0.1 $840.00 $84.00 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-01-14 REVISION OF [REDACTED] AND REVIEW OF PRIOR DOCUMENT PRODUCTIONS FOR 1.0 $250.00 $250.00 121 [REDACTED] WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-01-14 REVISION OF [REDACTED] AND REVIEW OF PRIOR DOCUMENT PRODUCTIONS FOR 0.5 $250.00 $125.00 122 [REDACTED] WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-01-15 REVISION OF [REDACTED]; PREPARATION OF CORRESPONDENCE TO COCOUNSEL 2.9 $250.00 $725.00 WITH SAME: TELEPHONE CONFERENCE WITH COCOUNSEL RE: [REDACTED]; PREPARATION OF [REDACTED]S; PREPARATION OF CORRESPONDENCE TO AND INTEROFFICE CONFERENCE WITH RYAN ALLEN 123 124 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-01-15 Team meeting re discovery 0.3 $525.00 $157.50 125 WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-01-15 ATTENDANCE AT ZOOM WITH PLAINTIFFS COUNSEL RE: [REDACTED] 0.5 $585.00 $292.50 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-01-15 meeting re: [REDACTED] 0.3 $645.00 $193.50 126 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-01-17 TELEPHONE COFERENCE WITH [REDACTED]; INTEROFFICE CONFERENCE WITH 0.3 $250.00 $75.00 127 RYAN ALLEN HANCOCK RE: SAME 128 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-01-17 Teams mtg w/ PDW, KC, and SSB re [REDACTED] 0.3 $525.00 $157.50 129 W&S Peter Winebrake 2025-01-17 Teams mtg w/ DAA, KC, and SSB re [REDACTED] 0.3 $840.00 $252.00 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-01-17 Team call re: [REDACTED] 0.4 $645.00 $258.00 130 131 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-01-21 REV scheduling order and update deadlines. 0.1 $525.00 $52.50 132 W&S Peter Winebrake 2025-01-23 Rev amendment sch order and ck [REDACTED] 0.1 $840.00 $84.00 133 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-01-30 [REDACTED]; confer with SSB re MCA 1.0 $525.00 $525.00 Entries in red have been reduced. Case 2:21-cv-03643-JDW Document 149 Filed 09/15/26 Page 23 of 60 Approved Fees A B C D E F G LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-01-30 Interview of [REDACTED]; research MCA issues 1.3 $645.00 $838.50 134 135 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-02-05 PC with PDW re status of MCA discovery. 0.2 $525.00 $105.00 136 W&S Peter Winebrake 2025-02-05 PC w/ DAA re [REDACTED] 0.2 $840.00 $168.00 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-02-13 REVIEW OF UPS'S DISCOVERY REPONSES AND PLAINTIFFS PROPOSED RESPONSE 0.3 $250.00 $75.00 RE: SAME PREPARATION OF CORRESPONDENCE TO COCOUNSEL RE: SAME 137 138 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-02-13 Draft m/c email re rolling production; confer with team re same 0.6 $525.00 $315.00 139 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-02-13 Review discovery responses 0.5 $525.00 $262.50 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-02-13 Review RFP and confer with KC re: [REDACTED] 0.3 $645.00 $193.50 140 WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-02-14 PREPARATION OF [REDACTED] PREPARATION OF CORRESPONDENCE TO BRIAN 1.2 $585.00 $702.00 SHMERLING [REDACTED]TELEPHONE CONFERENCE WITH KRYSTEN CONNON RE: 141 SAME; REVIEW OF DEPOSITION TRANSCRIPTS [REDACTED] 142 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-02-18 TELEPHONE CONFERENCE WITH RYAN ALLEN HANCOCK RE [REDACTED] 0.1 $250.00 $25.00 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-02-19 Confer with RHancock and KConnon re: [REDACTED] 0.2 $645.00 $129.00 143 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-02-19 confer with KC 0.3 $645.00 $193.50 144 145 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-02-20 REV draft letter to DEFCSL and discuss with PDW, email COCSL re same. 0.3 $525.00 $157.50 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-02-21 Corr with GKennedy re: meeting; confer with co counsel re: same 0.1 $645.00 $64.50 146 147 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-02-25 REVIEW OF DOCUMENTS [REDACTED] 1.2 $250.00 $300.00 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-02-26 TELEPHONE CONFERENCE WITH [REDACTED]; REVIEW OF DOCUMENTS RE: 5.8 $250.00 $1,450.00 [REDACTED]; PREPARATION OF CORRESPONDENCE TO RYAN ALLEN HANCOCK 148 RE: [REDACTED] AND WITH DOCUMENTS RE: [REDACTED] 149 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-02-26 Emails with COCSL re discovery issues. 0.1 $525.00 $52.50 150 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-02-26 Call re [REDACTED] 0.2 $525.00 $105.00 WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-02-26 INTEROFFICE CONFERENCE WITH BRIAN SHMERLING RE [REDACTED]; 0.7 $585.00 $409.50 TELEPHONE CONFERENCE WITH SARA [SIC] SCHALMAN-BERGEN RE [REDACTED] 151 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-02-26 Discussion re: [REDACTED] 0.3 $645.00 $193.50 152 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-02-26 Call with RHancock re: [REDACTED] 0.2 $645.00 $129.00 153 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-02-27 REVIEW OF UPS PRODUCTION; PREPARATION OF CORRESPONDENCE TO 3.8 $250.00 $950.00 COCOUNSEL [REDACTED] REVIEW OF INTAKE AND CORRESPONDENCES [REDACTED] TELEPHONE CONFERENCE [REDACTED]; INTEROFFICE CONFERENCE 154 WITH RYAN ALLEN HANCOCK RE: [REDACTED] Entries in red have been reduced. Case 2:21-cv-03643-JDW Document 149 Filed 09/15/26 Page 24 of 60 Approved Fees A B C D E F G 155 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-02-27 Confer with SSB re UPS document production and discovery timeline 0.3 $525.00 $157.50 156 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-02-27 Review document production; review responses to discovery 1.3 $525.00 $682.50 WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-02-27 INTEROFFICE CONFERENCE WITH BRIAN SHMERLING RE: [REDACTED] 0.4 $585.00 $234.00 157 TELEPHONE CONFERENCE WITH SARAH SCHALMAN-BERGEN RE: SAME LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-02-27 Confer with KC [REDACTED] 0.3 $645.00 $193.50 158 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-02-27 Review document production 0.9 $645.00 $580.50 159 160 WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-02-27 ATTENDANCE AT ZOOM WITH ALL COUNSEL RE: PRODUCTION 0.7 $585.00 $409.50 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-02-28 REVIEW OF DOCUMENTS; INTEROFFICE CONFERENCE WITH RYAN ALLEN 1.6 $250.00 $400.00 HANCOCK RE: [REDACTED]; TELEPHONE CONFERENCE WITH COCOUNSEL RE: 161 [REDACTED] 162 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-02-28 PC with COCSL re discovery planning. 0.2 $525.00 $105.00 163 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-02-28 REV MJG re MCA and rev memo he sent. 0.2 $525.00 $105.00 164 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-02-28 Team call 0.4 $525.00 $210.00 165 WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-02-28 LEGAL RESEARCH RE: [REDACTED] 0.5 $585.00 $292.50 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-02-28 Team meeting regarding [REDACTED] 0.4 $645.00 $258.00 166 167 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-03-01 Email to KC re document production. 0.1 $525.00 $52.50 168 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-03-03 PREPARATION OF CORRESPONDENCE TO [REDACTED] 0.7 $250.00 $175.00 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-03-04 LEGAL RESEARCH RE: [REDACTED]; PREPARATION OF CORRESPONDENCE TO 3.6 $250.00 $900.00 170 WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-03-04 LEGAL RESEARCH RE: [REDACTED] 0.5 $585.00 $292.50 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-03-05 LEGAL RESEARCH RE: [REDACTED]; INTEROFFICE CONFERENCE WITH RYAN 1.8 $250.00 $450.00 ALLEN HANCOCK RE: [REDACTED]; LEGAL RESEARCH RE: [REDACTED] 171 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-03-05 LEGAL RESEARCH RE: [REDACTED]; INTEROFFICE CONFERENCE WITH RYAN 2.0 $250.00 $500.00 ALLEN HANCOCK RE: [REDACTED]; LEGAL RESEARCH RE: [REDACTED] 172 173 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-03-05 PREPARATION OF CORRESPONDENCE TO COCOUNSEL [REDACTED] 0.7 $250.00 $175.00 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-03-05 LEGAL RESEARCH RE: [REDACTED]; PREPARATION OF CORRESPONDENCE TO 0.4 $250.00 $100.00 174 RYAN ALLEN HANCOCK AND COCOUNSEL RE: [REDACTED] WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-03-05 LEGAL RESEARCH [REDACTED]; REVIEW OF [REDACTED]; TELEPHONE 0.3 $585.00 $175.50 175 CONFERENCE [REDACTED] LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-03-05 Confer with RHancock [REDACTED] 0.2 $645.00 $129.00 176 177 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-03-06 TELEPHONE CONFERENCE WITH COCOUNSEL RE: [REDACTED] 0.7 $250.00 $175.00 178 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-03-06 PC with PDW re MCA strategy. 0.2 $525.00 $105.00 179 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-03-06 PC with COCSL re MCA strategy [REDACTED] 0.7 $525.00 $367.50 Entries in red have been reduced. Case 2:21-cv-03643-JDW Document 149 Filed 09/15/26 Page 25 of 60 Approved Fees A B C D E F G 180 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-03-06 Confer with R Hancock re [REDACTED] 0.2 $525.00 $105.00 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-03-06 Team call re: [REDACTED] 0.2 $645.00 $129.00 181 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-03-06 Review documents 0.8 $645.00 $516.00 182 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-03-07 LEGAL RESEARCH RE: [REDACTED]; INTEROFFICE CONFERENCE WITH RYAN 5.5 $250.00 $1,375.00 ALLEN HANCOCK RE: [REDACTED]; TELEPHONE CONFERENCE WITH COCOUNSEL 183 RE: [REDACTED] 184 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-03-07 PREPARATION OF CORRESPONDENCE [REDACTED] 0.4 $250.00 $100.00 185 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-03-07 Status conference with CT. 0.2 $525.00 $105.00 186 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-03-07 Strategy call with PDW, COCSL re MCA discovery. 1.0 $525.00 $525.00 187 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-03-07 REV order and calendar deadlines 0.1 $525.00 $52.50 188 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-03-07 Prepare for and participate in court conference 0.7 $525.00 $367.50 189 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-03-07 Review documents produced and discovery responses 1.3 $525.00 $682.50 190 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-03-07 Team calI re [REDACTED]; confer with ssb re same 1.0 $525.00 $525.00 191 W&S Peter Winebrake 2025-03-07 PC w/ all cocsl re [REDACTED] 1.0 $840.00 $840.00 WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-03-07 TELEPHONE CONFERENCE WITH [REDACTED] PREARATIONOF 0.8 $585.00 $468.00 192 CORRESPONDENCE TO BRIAN SHMERLING [REDACTED][MCA] LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-03-07 Call with Ryan Hancock re [REDACTED] 0.2 $645.00 $129.00 193 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-03-07 Strategy call with Pete and team 1.0 $645.00 $645.00 194 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-03-07 Review documents produced 1.1 $645.00 $709.50 195 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-03-07 Prepare for status call 0.6 $645.00 $387.00 196 197 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-03-09 Review document production 2.2 $525.00 $1,155.00 198 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-03-09 Conduct research re [REDACTED] 2.3 $525.00 $1,207.50 199 W&S Peter Winebrake 2025-03-09 Rev order and ck [REDACTED] 0.1 $840.00 $84.00 200 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-03-10 LEGAL RESEARCH RE: [REDACTED] [MCA] 2.1 $250.00 $525.00 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-03-10 Draft follow up correspondence re conferral and confer with SSB re same and 1.8 $525.00 $945.00 201 strategy 202 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-03-10 Review production and confer with SSB re same 2.5 $525.00 $1,312.50 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-03-10 Prep for meet and confer call; follow up re: same and [REDACTED] 1.9 $645.00 $1,225.50 203 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-03-10 Review documents; confer with KC re [REDACTED] 5.1 $645.00 $3,289.50 204 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-03-10 Research MCA 0.6 $645.00 $387.00 205 Entries in red have been reduced. Case 2:21-cv-03643-JDW Document 149 Filed 09/15/26 Page 26 of 60 Approved Fees A B C D E F G LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-03-10 research MCA 1.1 $645.00 $709.50 206 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-03-11 TELEPHONE CONFERENCE WITH RYAN ALLEN HANCOCK RE: [REDACTED]; 0.3 $250.00 $75.00 REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE FROM KRYSTEN CONNON RE: [REDACTED] 207 208 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-03-11 REV [REDACTED] and draft discovery request and email KC re same. 0.2 $525.00 $105.00 209 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-03-11 PC with SSB, KC re DEF document production, deposition planning. 0.2 $525.00 $105.00 210 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-03-11 Confer with D Aaron and SSB re [REDACTED] 0.3 $525.00 $157.50 211 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-03-11 Draft correspondence re outstanding discovery 0.5 $525.00 $262.50 212 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-03-11 Conduct research around [REDACTED] 1.3 $525.00 $682.50 213 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-03-11 Draft document request re [REDACTED] 0.6 $525.00 $315.00 214 WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-03-11 PREPARATION OF CORRESPONDENCE TO COCOUNSEL [REDACTED] 0.1 $585.00 $58.50 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-03-11 MEeting with DAAron and KConnon 0.3 $645.00 $193.50 215 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-03-11 Review documents 1.8 $645.00 $1,161.00 216 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-03-12 CORRESPONDENCE FROM KRYSTEN CONNON RE: [REDACTED]; REVIEW OF 0.5 $250.00 $125.00 COMPILED DISCOVERY INFORMATION; PREPARATION OF CORRESPONDENCE TO 217 COCOUNSEL WITH [REDACTED] 218 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-03-12 LEGAL RESEARCH RE: [REDACTED] 2.6 $250.00 $650.00 219 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-03-12 LEGAL RESEARCH [REDACTED] 0.5 $250.00 $125.00 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-03-12 Meet with S Kling re document review and organization and confer with SSB re same 0.5 $525.00 $262.50 220 221 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-03-12 Research [REDACTED] and confer with SSB re same 1.9 $525.00 $997.50 222 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-03-12 Coordinate document production organization and tagging 0.3 $525.00 $157.50 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-03-12 confer with KC re: [REDACTED] 0.1 $645.00 $64.50 223 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-03-12 Review documents; confer with KC 2.4 $645.00 $1,548.00 224 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-03-12 Meet with paralegal re: [REDACTED] eview [sic] documents 0.4 $645.00 $258.00 225 226 LLR Santiago Kling 2025-03-12 Team check in meeting, [REDACTED] 0.2 $225.00 $45.00 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-03-13 PREPARATION OF CORRESPONDENCE [REDACTED]; PREPARATION OF 0.3 $250.00 $75.00 227 CORRESPONDENCE [REDACTED] WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-03-13 LEGAL RESEARCH RE: [REDACTED]S; LEGAL RESEARCH RE: [REDACTED] REVIEW 3.6 $250.00 $900.00 228 OF [REDACTED] 229 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-03-13 LEGAL RESEARCH RE: [REDACTED] 4.1 $250.00 $1,025.00 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-03-13 REVIEW OF AND TAGGING OF UPS' RECENT PRODUCTION RE: MOTOR CARRIER 2.0 $250.00 $500.00 230 ACT Entries in red have been reduced. Case 2:21-cv-03643-JDW Document 149 Filed 09/15/26 Page 27 of 60 Approved Fees A B C D E F G 231 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-03-13 CONFERENCE WITH SARAH SCHALMAN BERGEN RE: [REDACTED] 0.3 $250.00 $75.00 232 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-03-13 Email to SSB re MCA research. 0.1 $525.00 $52.50 233 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-03-13 MCA research. 1.1 $525.00 $577.50 234 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-03-14 CONFERENCE WITH COCOUNSEL RE: [REDACTED] 0.6 $250.00 $150.00 235 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-03-14 CONFERENCE WITH COCOUNSEL RE: [REDACTED] 0.5 $250.00 $125.00 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-03-14 LEGAL RESEARCH RE: [REDACTED]; PREPARATION OF MEMO TO COCOUNSEL RE: 4.8 $250.00 $1,200.00 [REDACTED]; LEGAL RESEARCH RE: [REDACTED] PREPARATION OF LLR Krysten Connon 2025-03-14 Team meeting re MCA and case strategy; research MCA and confer with SSB; draft 1.5 $525.00 $787.50 follow up correspondence to opposing counsel re deposition scheduling and 237 discovery WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-03-14 ATTENDANCE AT ZOOM ALL PLAINTIFFS' RE: [REDACTED] ;TELEPHONE 1.4 $585.00 $819.00 CONFERENCE WITH [REDACTED]; PREPARATION OF CORRESPONDENCE 238 [REDACTED] LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-03-14 Team call re [REDACTED] confer with RHancock re [REDACTED]; follow up with KC 1.0 $645.00 $645.00 239 re: [REDACTED] and meet and confer re: same LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-03-14 Review def meet and confer correspondence re: discovery; confer iwth [sic] KC re: 0.5 $645.00 $322.50 240 same; research [REDACTED] 241 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-03-16 PREPARATION OF CORRESPONDENCE TO COCOUNSEL [REDACTED] 0.3 $250.00 $75.00 242 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-03-16 LEGAL REARCH RE: [REDACTED] 0.8 $250.00 $200.00 243 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-03-16 Draft motion to amend the complaint to add named plaintiffs 3.1 $525.00 $1,627.50 244 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-03-17 LEGAL REARCH RE: [REDACTED] 0.8 $250.00 $200.00 245 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-03-18 LEGAL REARCH RE: [REDACTED] 2.3 $250.00 $575.00 246 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-03-18 Meet with SSB and S Kling re [REDACTED] 0.2 $525.00 $105.00 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-03-18 Meeting with Paralegal re [REDACTED] 0.2 $645.00 $129.00 247 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-03-18 Review documents 0.5 $645.00 $322.50 248 249 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-03-19 LEGAL REARCH RE: [REDACTED] 2.0 $250.00 $500.00 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-03-19 Document review 0.9 $645.00 $580.50 250 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-03-20 PREPARATION OF CORRESPONDENCE TO RYAN ALLEN HANCOCK WITH 0.2 $250.00 $50.00 251 COMPILED INFORMATION RE: [REDACTED] LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-03-20 Respond to GKennedy email; circulate same to co counsel 0.9 $645.00 $580.50 252 253 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-03-21 LEGAL REARCH RE: [REDACTED] 1.0 $250.00 $250.00 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-03-21 REVISION OF AMENDED COMPLAINT; PREPARATION OF CORRESPONDENCE TO 1.2 $250.00 $300.00 254 COCOUNSEL WITH SAME [MCA] Entries in red have been reduced. Case 2:21-cv-03643-JDW Document 149 Filed 09/15/26 Page 28 of 60 Approved Fees A B C D E F G WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-03-21 DRAFTED FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; INTEROFFICE CONFERENCE WITH BRIAN 1.5 $585.00 $877.50 SHMERLING RE: [REDACTED]; TELEPHONE CONFERENCES [REDACTED] 255 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-03-21 Edit amended complaint and confer with co counsel 0.2 $645.00 $129.00 256 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-03-21 Review correspondence from GK and send thoughts re same to co counsel 0.1 $645.00 $64.50 257 258 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-03-24 LEGAL REARCH RE: [REDACTED] 1.3 $250.00 $325.00 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-03-24 Review and edit amended complaint and circulate same to co counsel 0.6 $645.00 $387.00 259 WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-03-24 ATTENDANCE AT ZOOM WITH ALL COUNSEL RE: MEET AND CONFER; TELEPHONE 1.0 $585.00 $585.00 CONFERENCE WITH SARAH SCHALMAN-BERGEN RE: SAME [MCA] 260 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-03-24 meet and confer call with defense; follow up call with RHancock re: [REDACTED] 1.5 $645.00 $967.50 261 262 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-03-25 LEGAL REARCH RE: [REDACTED] 0.9 $250.00 $225.00 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-03-26 REVIEW OF REVISION OF DRAFT FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; INTEROFFICE 1.5 $250.00 $375.00 CONFERENCE WITH RYAN ALLEN HANCOCK RE: [REDACTED]; PREPARATION OF CORRESPONDENCE TO COCOUNSEL [REDACTED] 263 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-03-26 PREPARATION OF CORRESPONDENCE [REDACTED]; PREPARATION OF 1.1 $250.00 $275.00 CORRESPONDENCE [REDACTED]; PREPARATION OF CORRESPONDENCE TO 264 COCOUNSEL RE: [REDACTED] 265 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-03-26 REV draft amended complaint. 0.2 $525.00 $105.00 266 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-03-26 REV CORR from def re data related to MCA-related duties. 0.1 $525.00 $52.50 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-03-26 Amend complaint and confer re: same 0.2 $645.00 $129.00 267 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-03-26 Finalize amended complaint and circulate to co counsel 0.4 $645.00 $258.00 268 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-03-26 Review DAAron comments to amended complaint 0.1 $645.00 $64.50 269 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-03-27 CORRESPONDENCE FROM [REDACTED] PREPARATION OF CORRESPONDENCE TO 0.9 $250.00 $225.00 270 COCOUNSEL [REDACTED] 271 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-03-27 Review amended Complaint and confer with SSB re same 0.8 $525.00 $420.00 272 WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-03-27 TELEPHONE CONFERENCE WITH [REDACTED] [MCA] 0.1 $585.00 $58.50 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-03-27 Finalize amended complaint; confer with RHancock and BShmerling and KC re: 0.3 $645.00 $193.50 273 same; coordinate sending of same LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-03-27 Review GKennedy email re: data proposal and confer re: same 0.1 $645.00 $64.50 274 Entries in red have been reduced. Case 2:21-cv-03643-JDW Document 149 Filed 09/15/26 Page 29 of 60 Approved Fees A B C D E F G WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-03-28 LEGAL RESEARCH RE [REDACTED] PREPARATION OF CORRESPONDENCE TO 1.1 $250.00 $275.00 275 COCOUNSEL [REDACTED] WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-03-28 CORRESPONDENCE FORM COCOUNSEL [REDACTED]; PREPARATION OF 0.5 $250.00 $125.00 CORRESPONDENCE TO COCOUNSEL RE: [REDACTED] PREPARATION OF 276 CORRESPONDENCE TO RYAN ALLEN HANCOCK [REDACTED] LLR Krysten Connon 2025-03-28 Confer with SSB re [REDACTED] review and edit draft letter to Court re amended 1.4 $525.00 $735.00 277 Complaint; confer with opposing counsel re same LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-03-28 Confer with KC re [REDACTED] 0.2 $645.00 $129.00 278 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-03-31 Edit letter to court with amended complaint; confer with GKennedy and KC re: same 0.6 $645.00 $387.00 279 280 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-04-01 MTG with SSB, KC re [REDACTED] 0.3 $525.00 $157.50 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-04-01 Review court extension order and confer re: [REDACTED] 0.3 $645.00 $193.50 281 282 WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-04-02 ATTENDANCE AT PLAINTIFFS CALL RE [REDACTED] 0.5 $585.00 $292.50 283 WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-04-02 ATTENDANCE AT ZOOM MEET AND CONFER RE: MCA EXEMPTION 0.8 $585.00 $468.00 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-04-02 Meet and confer call with defense re amended complaint and outstanding 0.9 $645.00 $580.50 284 discovery disputes 285 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-04-03 Confer with P Winebrake and DAaron and SSB re [REDACTED] 0.7 $525.00 $367.50 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-04-03 Review UPS's proposed stipulation re amendment; discuss same with SSB; draft 0.8 $525.00 $420.00 286 correspondence regarding same 287 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-04-03 Call with SSB and [REDACTED] 0.5 $525.00 $262.50 288 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-04-03 Draft Plaintiff’s position for 4/8/25 submission to court 0.9 $525.00 $472.50 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-04-03 Review discovery responses and draft correspondence regarding production 1.2 $525.00 $630.00 289 290 W&S Peter Winebrake 2025-04-03 Remote mtg w. var cocsl re [REDACTED] 0.3 $840.00 $252.00 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-04-03 Amend Complaint and circulate same; review UPS stipulation re amendment 0.5 $645.00 $322.50 291 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-04-03 Review [REDACTED] and confer with KC re: [REDACTED] 0.4 $645.00 $258.00 292 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-04-03 Conference with PWinebrake and DAAron and KC re [REDACTED] 0.7 $645.00 $451.50 293 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-04-03 Meet and confer call [REDACTED]; TC with [REDACTED] confer with RHancock re 1.6 $645.00 $1,032.00 294 [REDACTED] LLR Krysten Connon 2025-04-04 Review discovery and update draft discovery correspondence, draft email regarding 2.3 $525.00 $1,207.50 295 depositions LLR Krysten Connon 2025-04-04 Finalize stipulation and amended complaint; confer with SSB re [REDACTED] 2.2 $525.00 $1,155.00 296 Entries in red have been reduced. Case 2:21-cv-03643-JDW Document 149 Filed 09/15/26 Page 30 of 60 Approved Fees A B C D E F G W&S Peter Winebrake 2025-04-04 Rev many acc emails re discovery issues and resulting joint let to ct (incl draft) and 0.2 $840.00 $168.00 297 resulting order extending var dlns. LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-04-04 Finalize amended complaint; confer with co counsel team re [REDACTED] 0.2 $645.00 $129.00 298 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-04-04 TC with opposing counsel re: amended complaint and leave to amend; edit 0.3 $645.00 $193.50 299 stipulation LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-04-04 Review discovery and production for deficiencies in anticipation of meet and confer 1.2 $645.00 $774.00 300 conference; confer with KC re: [REDACTED] LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-04-04 Finalize amended complaint; review and edit stip with d edits; confer with KC and 0.5 $645.00 $322.50 301 RH re [REDACTED] LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-04-04 Multiple TC with [REDACTED] finalize amended complaint and stipulation; confer 1.0 $645.00 $645.00 302 with RHancock and KC [REDACTED] LLR Krysten Connon 2025-04-06 Confer with SSB and RH re [REDACTED]; call with opposing counsel re amended 0.7 $525.00 $367.50 303 complaint; Finalize amended complaint for filing 304 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-04-06 Draft position statement re discovery and status 7.8 $525.00 $4,095.00 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-04-07 PREPARATION OF CORRESPONDENCE TO COCOUNSEL Re: [REDACTED]; 0.4 $250.00 $100.00 305 REVISION OF DRAFT DISOVERY LETTER RE: [REDACTED] LLR Krysten Connon 2025-04-07 Finalize discovery submission for circulation to opposing counsel; review co- 3.7 $525.00 $1,942.50 306 counsel edits to same and incorporate; confer with SSB re same W&S Peter Winebrake 2025-04-07 Rev stipulation to amend epi and var related emails and resulting amended 0.2 $840.00 $168.00 307 complaint as docketed. LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-04-07 Confer re: [REDACTED] 0.2 $645.00 $129.00 308 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-04-07 Review BShmerling edits 0.2 $645.00 $129.00 309 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-04-07 Review and edit discovery correspondence and confer re: same 0.3 $645.00 $193.50 310 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-04-07 Review and edit discovery dispute letter; confer re: MCA and FAA; research 4.0 $645.00 $2,580.00 311 [REDACTED] W&S Peter Winebrake 2025-04-08 Rev letter to Judge re discovery disputes and catch-up entry for rev of draft of same 0.4 $840.00 $336.00 312 and pc w/ DAA re same. 313 WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-04-08 PREPARATION OF CORRESPONDENCE [REDACTED] 0.4 $585.00 $234.00 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-04-08 Finalize and file submissions; confer with GKennedy re: same 0.5 $645.00 $322.50 314 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-04-09 Review UPS submission re exemption and prepare for argument; research 1.4 $645.00 $903.00 315 [REDACTED]; confer with KC and Daaron re: [REDACTED] LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-04-09 Confer with KC re [REDACTED] 0.3 $645.00 $193.50 316 Entries in red have been reduced. Case 2:21-cv-03643-JDW Document 149 Filed 09/15/26 Page 31 of 60 Approved Fees A B C D E F G LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-04-10 Finalize correspondence to send to Judge Wolson with DNJ order; Confer with 0.2 $645.00 $129.00 317 RhAncock and KC re same WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-04-11 REVIEW OF [REDACTED] PREPARATION OF CORRESPONDENCE TO RYAN ALLEN 0.3 $250.00 $75.00 318 HANCOCK AND COCOUNSEL RE: [REDACTED] 319 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-04-11 Pull and review MCA fees to date and send to COCSL. 0.2 $525.00 $105.00 320 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-04-11 Review submissions to Court in advance of conference; attend conference 1.1 $525.00 $577.50 W&S Peter Winebrake 2025-04-11 Rev order requiring def to complete “exempt-position” chart and var acc emails re 0.2 $840.00 $168.00 321 same and pc w/ DAA re [REDACTED] LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-04-11 Prepare for hearing; participate in hearing; follow up re: same 1.3 $645.00 $838.50 322 323 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-04-11 Review submissions to Court in advance of conference; attend conference 1.1 $525.00 $577.50 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-04-15 Review UPS production of documents and response to RFP 70; draft meet and 0.6 $525.00 $315.00 324 confer email; confer with SSB re same LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-04-16 Research [REDACTED]; confer with KC re: [REDACTED] 1.6 $645.00 $1,032.00 325 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-04-18 REVIEW OF UPS'S ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO THE FIRST AMENDED 0.4 $250.00 $100.00 COMPLAINT; PREPARATION OF CORRESPONDENCE TO COCOUNSEL [REDACTED] 326 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-04-18 Edit stipulation and confer with KC, send to UPS 0.3 $645.00 $193.50 327 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-04-18 Confer with KC and DA re: [REDACTED]; meet and confer with defense counsel and 4.1 $645.00 $2,644.50 328 follow up memo re: same LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-04-18 meet and confer correspondence re. answer and discovery schedule; research 1.7 $645.00 $1,096.50 329 same and confer with KC re :same 330 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-04-21 PREPARATION OF CORRESPONDENCE TO COCOUNSEL [REDACTED] 0.4 $250.00 $100.00 331 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-04-21 Review documents [REDACTED] and conduct research re same 3.9 $525.00 $2,047.50 332 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-04-21 Prepare for discovery meet and confer 0.9 $525.00 $472.50 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-04-21 Review newly produced documents/ spreadsheets/ data 0.5 $645.00 $322.50 333 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-04-21 [REDACTED] prepare for depositions; confer with KC re: same 0.8 $645.00 $516.00 334 335 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-04-22 PC with PDW re status of MCA discovery. 0.2 $525.00 $105.00 336 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-04-22 Call with COCSL re [REDACTED] 0.5 $525.00 $262.50 337 W&S Peter Winebrake 2025-04-22 PC w./ [sic] DAA re [REDACTED] 0.2 $840.00 $168.00 338 WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-04-22 ATTENDANCE AT ZOOM ALL COUNSEL MEET AND CONFER 1.1 $585.00 $643.50 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-04-22 Confer with DAaron and KC re discovery; meet and confer call with defense 0.7 $645.00 $451.50 339 340 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-04-22 Conferral with DEFCSL re document production. 1.1 $525.00 $577.50 341 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-04-23 PREPARATION OF CORRESPONDENCE TO COCOUNSEL [REDACTED] 0.6 $250.00 $150.00 Entries in red have been reduced. Case 2:21-cv-03643-JDW Document 149 Filed 09/15/26 Page 32 of 60 Approved Fees A B C D E F G 342 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-04-23 Email to COCSL re MCA discovery. 0.1 $525.00 $52.50 343 WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-04-23 REVIEW OF UPS SUPPLEMENTAL PRODUCTION [MCA] 0.5 $585.00 $292.50 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-04-23 Confer with RHancock re: [REDACTED] 0.6 $645.00 $387.00 344 345 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-04-24 Coordinate depositions 0.8 $525.00 $420.00 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-04-24 Review BS background research [REDACTED] conduct research on [REDACTED] 3.3 $525.00 $1,732.50 346 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-04-24 Review discovery correspondence and review spreadsheet production; confer with 0.7 $645.00 $451.50 347 KC Re: [REDACTED] WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-04-24 REVIEW OF DISCOVERY DOCUMENTS; PREPARATION OF DEPOSITION OUTLINES 2.1 $250.00 $525.00 348 [MCA] 349 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-04-25 Review production; confer with SSB re same 0.5 $525.00 $262.50 350 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-04-25 Conduct research on class certification and MCA 2.5 $525.00 $1,312.50 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-04-27 REVIEW OF [REDACTED] IN PREPARATION FOR UPCOMING DEPOSITIONS [MCA] 2.5 $250.00 $625.00 351 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-04-28 PREPARATION OF CORRESPONDENCE TO [REDACTED]; TELEPHONE 0.4 $250.00 $100.00 352 CONFERENCE WITH [REDACTED] LLR Krysten Connon 2025-04-28 Review chart of jobs and exemptions; conduct research re [REDACTED] confer with 3.5 $525.00 $1,837.50 353 SSB re same LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-04-28 Review chart; confer with KC; analyze [REDACTED]; create paralegal assignment for 3.4 $645.00 $2,193.00 354 depo prep [REDACTED] 355 LLR Santiago Kling 2025-04-28 Sorting through [REDACTED] within the production 1.0 $225.00 $225.00 LLR Santiago Kling 2025-04-28 Malone Depo Prep, sorting through the production given by UPS, tagging 4.0 $225.00 $900.00 356 [REDACTED] LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-04-28 Document review; review MCA research [REDACTED]: depo prep 4.7 $645.00 $3,031.50 357 358 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-04-28 REVIEW OF MCA DISCOVERY IN PREPARATION FOR DEPOSITION [MCA] 3.8 $250.00 $950.00 359 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-04-29 REV var emails from COCSL re depositions, case planning. 0.1 $525.00 $52.50 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-04-29 Conduct research [REDACTED] conduct research [REDACTED] conduct 4.8 $525.00 $2,520.00 360 background research re [BLANK] LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-04-29 Meet with paralegal re: [REDACTED]; fu re: same 0.6 $645.00 $387.00 361 362 LLR Santiago Kling 2025-04-29 Sorting through [REDACTED] within the production 3.0 $225.00 $675.00 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-04-29 Document review; research [REDACTED] deposition prep 1.5 $645.00 $967.50 363 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-04-29 Review case law; depo prep 2.6 $645.00 $1,677.00 364 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-04-29 Depo prep; draft outline 2.1 $645.00 $1,354.50 365 Entries in red have been reduced. Case 2:21-cv-03643-JDW Document 149 Filed 09/15/26 Page 33 of 60 Approved Fees A B C D E F G WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-04-29 CORRESPONDENCE FROM SARAH SCHALMAN BERGEN RE: [REDACTED] ; 2.3 $250.00 $575.00 PREPARATION OF CORRESPONDENCE TO COCOUNSEL [REDACTED]; REVIEW OF MCA DISCOVERY PRODUCTION IN PREPARATION FOR DEPOSITIONS [MCA] 366 367 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-04-29 REVIEW OF MCA DISCOVERY IN PREPARATION FOR DEPOSITION [MCA] 3.4 $250.00 $850.00 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-04-30 ATTENDANCE AT ZOOM CONFERENCE WITH COCOUNSEL RE [REDACTED]; 4.5 $250.00 $1,125.00 368 REVIEW OF DISCOVERY RE: [REDACTED] 369 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-04-30 PC with SSB KC re MCA discovery. 0.2 $525.00 $105.00 370 WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-04-30 ATTENDANCE AT ZOOM ALL PLAINTIFFS RE: [REDACTED] 1.0 $585.00 $585.00 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-04-30 Review spreadsheet and [REDACTED]; compile list for meet and confer 0.3 $645.00 $193.50 371 372 LLR Santiago Kling 2025-04-30 Sorting through [REDACTED]ts within the production 2.0 $225.00 $450.00 373 LLR Santiago Kling 2025-04-30 Sorting through [REDACTED] 3.0 $225.00 $675.00 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-04-30 Team call re [REDACTED] draft deposition outline 1.0 $645.00 $645.00 374 375 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-05-01 PREPARATION OF CORRESPONDENCE TO COCOUNSEL [REDACTED] 0.4 $250.00 $100.00 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-05-01 Coordinate depo prep and exhibits with paralegal 0.3 $645.00 $193.50 376 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-05-02 Confer with H. Lichten, M. Thomson, SSB, and T. Fowler re MCA; confer with R. 2.9 $525.00 $1,522.50 377 Hancock [REDACTED] confer with SSB re [REDACTED] LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-05-02 Confer with RHancock re: [REDACTED] 0.4 $645.00 $258.00 378 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-05-02 Deposition prep; review supplemental production from GKennedy; meetings with 2.1 $645.00 $1,354.50 HLichten, MThomson, TFowler re: MCA exemption; confer with RHancock re: 379 [REDACTED] LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-05-02 deposition prep for angie woodruff 3.0 $645.00 $1,935.00 380 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-05-02 Deposition prep 0.4 $645.00 $258.00 381 382 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-05-05 Research re [REDACTED] and email to COCSL re same. 1.6 $525.00 $840.00 383 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-05-05 Confer with opposing counsel and SSB re same 1.1 $525.00 $577.50 384 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-05-05 Develop [REDACTED] and review documents produced 2.8 $525.00 $1,470.00 385 W&S Peter Winebrake 2025-05-05 Rev LRR let to def csl re incurred fees and and some other acc emails. 0.1 $840.00 $84.00 WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-05-05 REVISION OF [REDACTED]; PREPARATION OF CORRESPONDENCE TO COCOUNSEL 0.4 $585.00 $234.00 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-05-05 Meeting with UPS re status and fup re; Same and deposition prep of plaintiffs 1.2 $645.00 $774.00 387 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-05-05 Deposition prep 6.1 $645.00 $3,934.50 388 Entries in red have been reduced. Case 2:21-cv-03643-JDW Document 149 Filed 09/15/26 Page 34 of 60 Approved Fees A B C D E F G WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-05-05 REVIEW OF MOTOR CARRIER ACT PRODUCTION IN PREPARATION FOR 4.0 $250.00 $1,000.00 DEPOSITIONS; PREPARATION OF DEPOSITION OUTLINES; PREPARATION OF 389 CORRESPONDENCE TO COCOUNSEL [REDACTED] WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-05-05 PREPARATION OF DEPOSITION OUTLINES; PREPARATION OF CORRESPONDENCE 1.3 $250.00 $325.00 390 TO COCOUNSEL [REDACTED] WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-05-06 REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE FROM SARAH SCHALMAN BERGEN RE: 0.1 $250.00 $25.00 [REDACTED]; PREPARATION OF CORRESPONDENCE TO COCOUNSEL RE: 391 [REDACTED] WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-05-06 PREPARATION OF CORRESPONDENCES TO AND TELELPHONE CONFERENCES 1.4 $250.00 $350.00 392 WITH [REDACTED] LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-05-06 Depo prep 8.0 $645.00 $5,160.00 393 394 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-05-07 draft correspondence to opposing counsel re outstanding discovery items 0.3 $525.00 $157.50 395 WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-05-07 ATTENDANCE AT ZOOM WITH COCOUNSEL RE: [REDACTED] 0.2 $585.00 $117.00 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-05-07 Depo prep and deposition of Angie Woodruff; follow up debrief re [REDACTED] 10.8 $645.00 $6,966.00 396 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-05-07 REVIEW OF MOTOR CARRIER ACT PRODUCTION RE: [REDACTED]; ATTENDANCE AT 6.8 $250.00 $1,700.00 397 DEPOSITION OF ANGIE WOODRUFF [MCA] WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-05-08 PREPARATION OF CORRESPONDENCE [REDACTED]; PREPARATION OF 1.3 $250.00 $325.00 398 CORRESPONDENCES [REDACTED] WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-05-08 PREPARATION OF CORRESPONDENCE TO RYAN ALLEN HANCOCK [REDACTED] 0.3 $250.00 $75.00 399 400 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-05-08 Review email from opposing counsel and confer internally re same 0.4 $525.00 $210.00 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-05-08 Confer with KC re: [REDACTED] review initial disclosures for remaining discovery 0.5 $645.00 $322.50 401 [REDACTED]; LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-05-08 Compile and send finalize depo exhibits to court reporter 0.6 $645.00 $387.00 402 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-05-08 Review edit depo prep outline for plaintiffs 0.3 $645.00 $193.50 403 404 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-05-08 ATTENDANCE AT ZOOM DEPOSITION PREPARATION [REDACTED] 1.5 $250.00 $375.00 405 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-05-09 INTEROFFICE CONFERENCE WITH RYAN ALLEN HANCOCK RE [REDACTED] 0.2 $250.00 $50.00 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-05-09 Review correspondence from defense counsel re discovery; draft submission to 5.1 $525.00 $2,677.50 406 Court re discovery dispute LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-05-09 Review newly served written discovery by UPS 0.2 $645.00 $129.00 407 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-05-09 Review GKennedy email re: deposition limits and refusal to provide additional 0.5 $645.00 $322.50 408 information; confer with KC re: [REDACTED] 409 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-05-09 ATTENDANCE AT ZOOM DEPOSITION PREPARATION [REDACTED] 1.0 $250.00 $250.00 Entries in red have been reduced. Case 2:21-cv-03643-JDW Document 149 Filed 09/15/26 Page 35 of 60 Approved Fees A B C D E F G LLR Krysten Connon 2025-05-10 Review record; draft submission to Court re discovery dispute and compile record 6.4 $525.00 $3,360.00 410 re same W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-05-11 REV and edit draft letter to court re MCA discovery deficiencies, email to COCSL. 0.8 $525.00 $420.00 411 412 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-05-11 Draft and finalize submission to Court 4.5 $525.00 $2,362.50 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-05-11 Review and edit submission to court re: discovery disputes; confer with KC re: same 3.1 $645.00 $1,999.50 413 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-05-12 REVIEW OF DOCUMENTS IN PREPARATION FOR DEPOSITION OF BRIAN SPELLER 0.8 $250.00 $200.00 414 [MCA] 415 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-05-13 REV Def response to motion to compel. 0.2 $525.00 $105.00 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-05-13 REVIEW OF [REDACTED] PREPARATION OF NOTES RE SAME IN PREPARATION FOR 2.7 $250.00 $675.00 DEPOSITIONS; PREPARATION OF CORRESPONDENCE TO COCOUNSEL WITH 416 [REDACTED] LLR Krysten Connon 2025-05-14 Review UPS submission; conduct related legal research; prepare for court hearing 3.5 $525.00 $1,837.50 417 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-05-14 Depo prep 1.7 $645.00 $1,096.50 418 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-05-14 Draft speller outline 0.6 $645.00 $387.00 419 420 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-05-14 ATTENDANCE AT ZOOM DEPOSITION PREP WITH [REDACTED] 0.9 $250.00 $225.00 421 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-05-14 ATTENDANCE AT ZOOM DEPOSITION PREP WITH [REDACTED] 0.7 $250.00 $175.00 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-05-14 PREPARATION OF EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITION QUESTIONS FOR DEPOSITION OF 4.0 $250.00 $1,000.00 JEAN DITMARS; PREPARATION OF COORESPONDENCE TO COCOUNSEL WITH 422 SAME [MCA] WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-05-14 PREPARATION OF EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITION QUESTIONS FOR DEPOSITION OF 0.2 $250.00 $50.00 423 BRIAN SPELLER [MCA] 424 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-05-15 PREPARATION OF CORRESPONDENCE TO COCOUNSEL RE [REDACTED] 0.2 $250.00 $50.00 425 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-05-15 Organize case file, save misc. docs, etc. 0.1 $525.00 $52.50 426 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-05-15 PC with PDW re motion to compel, status of discovery. 0.2 $525.00 $105.00 427 W&S Peter Winebrake 2025-05-15 Rev def's response to motion to compel and email to cocsl re my thoughts. 0.2 $840.00 $168.00 W&S Peter Winebrake 2025-05-15 Rev final version of letter to court (now converted to motion to compel) and 0.4 $840.00 $336.00 attached exhibits and catch-up entry for rev of many emails and some attachments 428 re same. 429 W&S Peter Winebrake 2025-05-15 PC w/ DAA re [REDACTED] 0.2 $840.00 $168.00 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-05-15 Depo prep and depo of Jean Ditmars; follow up re: same with KC and gather 3.1 $645.00 $1,999.50 430 exhibits 431 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-05-15 ATTENDANCE AT DEPOSITION OF JEAN DITMARS [MCA] 3.1 $250.00 $775.00 Entries in red have been reduced. Case 2:21-cv-03643-JDW Document 149 Filed 09/15/26 Page 36 of 60 Approved Fees A B C D E F G WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-05-15 CORRESPONDENCE FROM COCOUNSEL; PREPARATION OF CORRESPONDENCE 0.9 $250.00 $225.00 TO COCOUNSEL RE [REDACTED] IN PREPARATION FOR DEPOSITION OF BRIAN 432 SPELLER [MCA] WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-05-16 REVIEW OF PROPOSED DEPOSITION OUTLINE FOR DEPOSITION OF BRIAN 0.6 $250.00 $150.00 SPELLER; PREPARATION OF CORRESPONDENCE TO COCOUNSEL WITH 433 [REDACTED] 434 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-05-16 ATTENDANCE AT DEPOSITION OF BRIAN SPELLER [MCA] 4.0 $250.00 $1,000.00 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-05-16 Depo prep 1.6 $645.00 $1,032.00 435 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-05-16 Deposition of Speller and follow up re: same 6.8 $645.00 $4,386.00 436 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-05-16 Meet and confer with Defense re: discovery obligations; confer with KC re; same; 1.0 $645.00 $645.00 437 depo prep LLR Krysten Connon 2025-05-18 Review record and filings for hearing; organize documents for hearing; confer with 3.5 $525.00 $1,837.50 438 SSB re same LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-05-18 Oral argument prep 0.6 $645.00 $387.00 439 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-05-18 Prep for oral argument; research relevant issues 3.1 $645.00 $1,999.50 440 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-05-19 PREPARATION OF CORRESPONDENCE TO [REDACTED]; PREPARATION OF 0.4 $250.00 $100.00 441 CORRESPONDENCE TO COCOUNSEL RE [REDACTED] 442 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-05-19 Emails with COCSL re [REDACTED] 0.1 $525.00 $52.50 443 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-05-19 PC with PDw re [REDACTED] 0.2 $525.00 $105.00 444 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-05-19 REV and save order. 0.1 $525.00 $52.50 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-05-19 Prepare for hearing; motion to compel hearing; team meeting re [REDACTED] 6.6 $645.00 $4,257.00 445 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-05-19 PREPARATION FOR HEARING; CONFERENCE WITH COCOUNSEL RE: SAME; 3.0 $250.00 $750.00 ATTENDANCE AT MOTION TO COMPEL HEARING IN EASTERN DISTRICT OF PA 446 447 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-05-20 PC with SSB, KC re [REDACTED] 0.3 $525.00 $157.50 448 W&S Peter Winebrake 2025-05-20 Rev ct order fr yesterday's hearing and var acc emails. 0.1 $840.00 $84.00 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-05-20 Confer with KC re [REDACTED]; review GKennedy email re: scheduling 0.3 $645.00 $193.50 449 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-05-20 Team call re discovery with KC and DA 0.7 $645.00 $451.50 450 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-05-20 Depo prep [REDACTED] assign [REDACTED] project to paralegal 0.2 $645.00 $129.00 451 452 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-05-21 PREPARATION OF CORRESPONDENCE TO COCOUNSEL RE: [REDACTED] 0.9 $250.00 $225.00 Entries in red have been reduced. Case 2:21-cv-03643-JDW Document 149 Filed 09/15/26 Page 37 of 60 Approved Fees A B C D E F G WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-05-21 REVIEW OF [REDACTED]; REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE FROM EMPLOYER'S 0.6 $585.00 $351.00 COUNSEL RE: DEPOSITION AND RESPONSES TO DISCOVERY [MCA] 453 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-05-21 confer with KC re [REDACTED] 0.8 $645.00 $516.00 454 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-05-21 Review depo scheduling correspondence and coordinate with RH and KC re same 0.2 $645.00 $129.00 455 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-05-21 Prep [REDACTED] deposition 1.6 $645.00 $1,032.00 456 457 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-05-21 ATTENDANCE AT ZOOM DEPOSITION PREPARATION [REDACTED] 1.5 $250.00 $375.00 458 W&S Peter Winebrake 2025-05-22 Teams mtg w/ all cocsl re [REDACTED]; rev var acc emails re same 0.5 $840.00 $420.00 WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-05-22 ATTENDANCE AT UPS [REDACTED] WITH COCOUNSEL; TELEPHONE 2.2 $585.00 $1,287.00 CONFERENCES (4) WITH SARA SCHALMAN BERGEN, [REDACTED] PREPARATION 459 OF CORRESPONDENCES (3) TO [REDACTED] LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-05-22 Review data declaration; [REDACTED] and assign to paralegal to [REDACTED] 0.4 $645.00 $258.00 460 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-05-22 Compile Ditmars exhibits for court reporter; search for website UPS took down 0.3 $645.00 $193.50 461 the day after the deposition LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-05-22 confer with KC re: [REDACTED]; research [REDACTED] 0.6 $645.00 $387.00 462 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-05-22 Team meeting re: [REDACTED] 0.4 $645.00 $258.00 463 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-05-22 Confer with RH re: [REDACTED] 0.3 $645.00 $193.50 464 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-05-22 Confer with KC re: [REDACTED] 0.3 $645.00 $193.50 465 466 LLR Santiago Kling 2025-05-22 Memo Work for Speller Deposition 3.0 $225.00 $675.00 467 LLR Santiago Kling 2025-05-22 Brian speller deposition work, [REDACTED] 5.0 $225.00 $1,125.00 468 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-05-22 REV documents in preparation for T. Thomas deposition. 1.8 $525.00 $945.00 469 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-05-22 ATTENDANCE AT DEPOSITION PREP WITH [REDACTED] 1.0 $250.00 $250.00 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-05-22 ATTENDANCE AT ZOOM WITH COCOUNSEL RE UPCOMING DEPOSITIONS [MCA] 0.5 $250.00 $125.00 470 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-05-22 REVIEW OF DOCUMENTS PRODUCED AND PREPARATION OF EXHIBITS FOR 4.0 $250.00 $1,000.00 471 DEPOSITION OF TERRANCE [SIC] THOMAS [MCA] LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-05-23 Review data and edit data declaration draft 0.6 $645.00 $387.00 472 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-05-23 Further REV of documents, prepare outline for T. Thomas deposition, and email to 1.6 $525.00 $840.00 473 COCSL re same. Entries in red have been reduced. Case 2:21-cv-03643-JDW Document 149 Filed 09/15/26 Page 38 of 60 Approved Fees A B C D E F G LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-05-23 Review documents for training deposition; draft [REDACTED]; confer with DA re: 0.5 $645.00 $322.50 474 [REDACTED] WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-05-23 REVIEW OF PRODUCTION IN PREPARATION FOR DEPOSITIONS RE: [REDACTED] 5.5 $250.00 $1,375.00 PREPARATION OF 475 CORRESPONDENCE TO COCOUNSEL RE: [REDACTED] WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-05-25 REVIEW OF DOCUMENTS; PREPARATION OF DOCUMENTS AND EXHIBITS IN 1.6 $250.00 $400.00 476 PREPARATION FOR DEPOSITION OF TERRANCE [SIC] THOMAS [MCA] 477 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-05-26 Further REV of documents and preparation for T. Thomas deposition. 1.5 $525.00 $787.50 478 W&S Peter Winebrake 2025-05-27 PC w/ DAA re [REDACTED] 0.2 $840.00 $168.00 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-05-27 Review order from court re discovery; order transcript 0.4 $645.00 $258.00 479 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-05-27 Review latest document production 0.5 $645.00 $322.50 480 481 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-05-27 Deposition of T. Thomas. 3.5 $525.00 $1,837.50 482 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-05-27 Further preparation for T. Thomas deposition. 2.1 $525.00 $1,102.50 483 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-05-27 ATTENDANCE AT DEPOSITION OF TERRANCE [SIC] THOMAS [MCA] 3.3 $250.00 $825.00 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-05-28 Research [REDACTED] and confer with KC re: [REDACTED] 0.3 $645.00 $193.50 484 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-05-28 Review late produced documents for deposition; analyze data 1.0 $645.00 $645.00 485 486 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-05-29 TELEPHONE CONFERENCE WITH COCOUNSEL RE [REDACTED] 1.0 $250.00 $250.00 487 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-05-29 TELEPHONE CONFERENCE WITH COCOUNSEL RE [REDACTED] 0.5 $250.00 $125.00 488 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-05-29 PC with COCSL re [REDACTED] 0.7 $525.00 $367.50 489 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-05-29 PC with PDw re [REDACTED] 0.2 $525.00 $105.00 490 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-05-29 Team call re [REDACTED] 1.0 $525.00 $525.00 491 W&S Peter Winebrake 2025-05-29 Remote mtg w/ all cocsl re [REDACTED] 1.0 $840.00 $840.00 492 WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-05-29 ATTENDANCE AT ZOOM WITH COCOUNSEL RE: [REDACTED] 1.0 $585.00 $585.00 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-05-29 Team meeting 1.0 $645.00 $645.00 493 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-05-29 review newly produced documents 3.7 $645.00 $2,386.50 494 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-05-29 Review UPS late produced documents for Keri Green Deposition 0.3 $645.00 $193.50 495 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-05-29 REVIEW OF NEWLY PRODUCED DOCUMENTS AND VIDEOS IN PREPARATION FOR 0.2 $250.00 $50.00 496 DEPOSITION OF KERI GREEN [MCA] 497 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-05-29 ATTENDANCE AT DEPOSITION OF KERI GREEN [MCA] 4.4 $250.00 $1,100.00 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-05-29 K Green Deposition 5.3 $645.00 $3,418.50 498 Entries in red have been reduced. Case 2:21-cv-03643-JDW Document 149 Filed 09/15/26 Page 39 of 60 Approved Fees A B C D E F G WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-05-30 INTEROFFICE CONFERENCE WITH RYAN ALLEN HANCOCK RE: [REDACTED] 0.2 $250.00 $50.00 499 500 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-05-30 PC with PDw re [REDACTED] 0.2 $525.00 $105.00 501 W&S Peter Winebrake 2025-05-30 PC w/ DAA re [REDACTED] 0.2 $840.00 $168.00 502 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-06-02 Confer with SSB re discovery 0.8 $525.00 $420.00 503 WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-06-02 REVIEW OF UPS SUPPLEMENTAL PRODUCTION [MCA] 0.5 $585.00 $292.50 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-06-02 Confer re: [REDACTED] 0.8 $645.00 $516.00 504 505 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-06-03 Research re [REDACTED] and email COCSL re same. 0.2 $525.00 $105.00 506 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-06-03 REV misc emails and misc emails to COCSL re [REDACTED] 0.2 $525.00 $105.00 507 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-06-03 Conduct legal research [REDACTED] 1.1 $525.00 $577.50 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-06-04 CORRESPONDENCE FROM COCOUNSEL RE: [REDACTED]; REVIEW OF 1.6 $250.00 $400.00 PRODUCTION AND INDEX; PREPARATION OF CORRESPONDENCE TO COCOUNSEL 508 [REDACTED] 509 W&S Peter Winebrake 2025-06-04 PC w/ DAA re [REDACTED] 0.2 $840.00 $168.00 510 WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-06-05 PREPARATION OF DISCOVERY RESPONSES 1.5 $585.00 $877.50 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-06-05 Edit declaration; review [REDACTED] 3.1 $645.00 $1,999.50 511 512 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-06-06 REVIEW OF DOCUMENTSAND LEGAL RESEARCH RE [REDACTED] 0.7 $250.00 $175.00 513 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-06-06 Save documents to file and calendar deadlines. 0.1 $525.00 $52.50 514 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-06-06 REV and send var emails re [REDACTED] 0.2 $525.00 $105.00 515 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-06-06 Coordinate discovery and confer with SSB re same 0.8 $525.00 $420.00 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-06-06 Review data declaration; draft follow up correspondence to defense regarding 0.8 $645.00 $516.00 516 missing documents; confer with KC [REDACTED] LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-06-06 Confer with KC re: [REDACTED] and send assignment for [REDACTED] to paralegal 0.2 $645.00 $129.00 517 LLR Santiago Kling 2025-06-06 Drafting deposition notices for Bryan Schouman Fred Carr James Palmer Robert 1.0 $225.00 $225.00 518 Capone 519 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-06-06 Begin document review and preparation for B. Schouman deposition. 0.6 $525.00 $315.00 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-06-07 Depo prep 1.4 $645.00 $903.00 520 521 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-06-08 REVIEW OF DOCUMENTSAND LEGAL RESEARCH RE [REDACTED] 3.7 $250.00 $925.00 522 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-06-09 PC with SSB re [REDACTED] 0.2 $525.00 $105.00 523 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-06-09 PC with PDW re [REDACTED] 0.1 $525.00 $52.50 524 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-06-09 Research re [REDACTED] and email COCSL re same. 1.4 $525.00 $735.00 525 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-06-09 Coordinate depositions 0.2 $525.00 $105.00 526 W&S Peter Winebrake 2025-06-09 PC w/ DAA re [REDACTED] 0.1 $840.00 $84.00 527 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-06-09 REV documents and prepare outline in preparation for deposition. 2.8 $525.00 $1,470.00 Entries in red have been reduced. Case 2:21-cv-03643-JDW Document 149 Filed 09/15/26 Page 40 of 60 Approved Fees A B C D E F G LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-06-09 Depo prep 1.7 $645.00 $1,096.50 528 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-06-09 Depo prep 3.1 $645.00 $1,999.50 529 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-06-09 Depo prep 0.9 $645.00 $580.50 530 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-06-09 REVIEW OF DOCUMENT PRODUCTION IN PREPARATION FOR DEPOSITIONS OF 4.2 $250.00 $1,050.00 CARR AND CAPONE; PREPARATION OF [REDACTED] DEPOSITION EXHIBITS; PREPARATION OF CORRESPONDENCE TO COCOUNSEL [REDACTED] 531 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-06-10 CORRESPONDENCE FROM DEIRDRE AARON[REDACTED] REVIEW OF 1.3 $250.00 $325.00 PRODUCTION RE: [REDACTED] DOCUMENTS; PREPARATION OF 532 CORRESPONDENCE TO COCOUNSEL RE: SAME [MCA] 533 WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-06-10 CONFERENCE WITH COCOUNSEL RE: [REDACTED] 0.5 $585.00 $292.50 534 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-06-10 ATTENDANCE AT DEPOSITION OF BRYAN SCHOUMAN [MCA] 3.0 $250.00 $750.00 535 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-06-10 Further preparation for deposition of B. Schouman. 0.8 $525.00 $420.00 536 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-06-10 Take deposition of B. Schouman. 3.0 $525.00 $1,575.00 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-06-10 Speller deposition prep and follow up re: same 3.8 $645.00 $2,451.00 537 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-06-10 Speller prep and deposition 0.6 $645.00 $387.00 538 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-06-10 depo prep confer with deidre 1.7 $645.00 $1,096.50 539 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-06-11 CONFERENCE WITH [REDACTED] PREPARATION OF CORRESPONDANCE TO 0.7 $250.00 $175.00 540 COUNSEL RE: [REDACTED] WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-06-11 TELEPHONE CONFERENCE WITH [REDACTED]; PREPARATION OF 0.3 $250.00 $75.00 541 CORRESPONDANCE TO [REDACTED] WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-06-11 REVIEW OF NEWLY PRODUCED INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING WORK METHOD [MCA] 1.1 $250.00 $275.00 542 543 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-06-11 Review late produced documents 0.2 $525.00 $105.00 544 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-06-11 Coordinate depositions; confer with SSB re deposition prep 1.1 $525.00 $577.50 545 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-06-11 Review draft discovery responses 0.5 $525.00 $262.50 546 WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-06-11 DRAFTED RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR DISCOVERY [MCA] 1.0 $585.00 $585.00 547 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-06-11 Begin reviewing documents and drafting outline for J. Palmer deposition. 1.3 $525.00 $682.50 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-06-11 Review newly produced documents for Carr deposition; depo prep 6.3 $645.00 $4,063.50 548 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-06-11 depo prep/ draft outline 1.6 $645.00 $1,032.00 549 Entries in red have been reduced. Case 2:21-cv-03643-JDW Document 149 Filed 09/15/26 Page 41 of 60 Approved Fees A B C D E F G WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-06-12 TELEPHONE CONFERENCE WITH [REDACTED]; PREPARATION OF 0.6 $250.00 $150.00 550 CORRESPONDANCE TO RYAN ALLEN HANCOCK WITH [REDACTED] WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-06-12 TELEPHONE CONFERENCE WITH [REDACTED]; PREPARATION OF 0.7 $250.00 $175.00 551 CORRESPONDANCE TO RYAN ALLEN HANCOCK WITH [REDACTED] 552 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-06-12 PREPARATION OF CORRESPONDENCE TO COCOUNSEL RE: [REDACTED] 0.6 $250.00 $150.00 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-06-12 PREPARATION OF CORRESPONDENCE TO SARAH SCHALMAN-BERGEN 0.7 $250.00 $175.00 553 [REDACTED] 554 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-06-12 ATTENDANCE AT DEPOSITION OF FRED CARR [MCA] 3.0 $250.00 $750.00 555 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-06-12 Further REV of documents and preparation for J. Palmer deposition. 3.1 $525.00 $1,627.50 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-06-12 Depo prep/ review documents 0.7 $645.00 $451.50 556 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-06-12 Carr Depo - prep, depo and follow up 4.8 $645.00 $3,096.00 557 WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-06-13 PREPARATION OF DRAFT REPLY TO INTERROGATORIES; PREPARATION OF 1.0 $585.00 $585.00 558 CORRESPONDENCE TO KRYSTEN CONNON RE: 559 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-06-13 Deposition of J.Palmer. 4.1 $525.00 $2,152.50 560 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-06-13 Further prep for J. Palmer deposition. 0.9 $525.00 $472.50 561 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-06-14 Review correspondence re late produced discovery 0.1 $525.00 $52.50 562 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-06-14 Strategy re [REDACTED] 0.4 $525.00 $210.00 563 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-06-15 Check notes re [REDACTED] and VAR emails to COCSL re same. 0.2 $525.00 $105.00 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-06-15 Review and edit Plaintiffs responses to discovery and confer with SSB re same 3.1 $525.00 $1,627.50 564 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-06-15 Review responses to discovery/ confer with KC re: same and edit same 0.5 $645.00 $322.50 565 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-06-15 Depo prep Capone; review late produced IE manuals [REDACTED]; draft 0.7 $645.00 $451.50 deficiency email to defense counsel regarding misrepresentations made about 566 whether ie manual was produced 567 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-06-16 VAR emails with COCSL re [REDACTED] 0.2 $525.00 $105.00 568 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-06-16 Review late produced documents; confer with SSB re same 0.5 $525.00 $262.50 569 WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-06-16 REVISION OF DISCOVERY RESPONSES; PREPARATION OF [REDACTED] 1.3 $585.00 $760.50 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-06-16 Depo prep for Capone dep; review late produced documents 2.1 $645.00 $1,354.50 570 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-06-16 Capone Deposition 3.5 $645.00 $2,257.50 571 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-06-16 Depo prep 0.9 $645.00 $580.50 572 573 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-06-17 MTG with COCSL re [REDACTED] 1.0 $525.00 $525.00 574 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-06-17 Review declaration and confer with ssb re same 0.5 $525.00 $262.50 575 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-06-17 Team call re [REDACTED] 1.0 $525.00 $525.00 Entries in red have been reduced. Case 2:21-cv-03643-JDW Document 149 Filed 09/15/26 Page 42 of 60 Approved Fees A B C D E F G 576 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-06-17 Confer with SSB re [REDACTED] 0.3 $525.00 $157.50 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-06-17 Edit data declaration 0.6 $645.00 $387.00 577 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-06-17 Review declaration 0.6 $645.00 $387.00 578 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-06-17 Edit draft data declaration 0.6 $645.00 $387.00 579 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-06-17 Edit data declaration 0.3 $645.00 $193.50 580 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-06-17 Edit plaintiff discovery responses 0.8 $645.00 $516.00 581 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-06-17 Team meeting re class cert 1.0 $645.00 $645.00 582 WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-06-18 REVISION OF DISCOVERY RESPONSES; PREPARATION OF SERVICE OF DISCOVERY 2.5 $585.00 $1,462.50 583 RESPONSES [MCA] LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-06-18 Edit data declaration and send edits to UPS 0.5 $645.00 $322.50 584 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-06-18 Review and edit data dec 0.8 $645.00 $516.00 585 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-06-18 Review and finalize responses to named plaintiff discovery; correspond with 0.6 $645.00 $387.00 586 Ryan re same 587 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-06-19 Review UPS supplemental discovery responses 0.4 $525.00 $210.00 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-06-19 Review supplemetal rog response [REDACTED]; [REDACTED] 1.1 $645.00 $709.50 588 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-06-19 Review UPS belated amended responses to rogs based on contention 1.6 $645.00 $1,032.00 interrogatory argument; confer with KC and DA re: [_____________], review 589 case cited by UPS; draft meet and confer response 590 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-06-30 Draft correspondence re extension request; confer with SSB re same 0.5 $525.00 $262.50 591 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-07-01 VAR emails re [REDACTED] 0.1 $525.00 $52.50 592 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-07-01 PC with PDW re [REDACTED] 0.1 $525.00 $52.50 593 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-07-03 REV correspondence from court re briefing schedule. 0.1 $525.00 $52.50 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-07-03 Review order from Judge Wolson on schedule and extension and confer re: same 0.1 $645.00 $64.50 594 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-07-03 Confer with paralegal re. [REDACTED] review rog response and representations 2.0 $645.00 $1,290.00 595 made to court W&S Peter Winebrake 2025-07-04 Rev KC's final email to Judge re request for extension for reply brief and catch-up 0.2 $840.00 $168.00 entry for review and comments re same; rev def s response and Judge's ruling. 596 597 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-07-07 REV and save order and update deadlines. 0.1 $525.00 $52.50 Entries in red have been reduced. Case 2:21-cv-03643-JDW Document 149 Filed 09/15/26 Page 43 of 60 Approved Fees A B C D E F G LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-07-07 Draft statement of facts from depo transcripts 2.1 $645.00 $1,354.50 598 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-07-07 Review deposition transcripts for evidence reply brief 0.3 $645.00 $193.50 599 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-07-07 Prepare reply brief; review evidence 0.5 $645.00 $322.50 600 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-07-08 REVIEW OF UPS'S RESPONSE TO CLASS CERTIFICATION; LEGAL RESEARCH RE: 0.8 $250.00 $200.00 601 [REDACTED] 602 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-07-08 Prelim REV and save def opposition papers to class cert. 0.3 $525.00 $157.50 603 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-07-08 Confer with SSB re [REDACTED] 0.6 $525.00 $315.00 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-07-08 Review opposition; coordinate with paralegal re: [REDACTED]; prepare reply; 1.4 $645.00 $903.00 604 confer with KC LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-07-08 Meeting with KC re: [REDACTED]; review evidence and confer re: same 0.8 $645.00 $516.00 605 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-07-08 Review opposition brief and prepare for reply 0.8 $645.00 $516.00 606 607 LLR Santiago Kling 2025-07-08 Rely Brief Work 6.0 $225.00 $1,350.00 608 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-07-09 TELEPHONE CONFERENCE WITH COCOUNSEL RE [REDACTED] 1.0 $250.00 $250.00 609 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-07-09 PRELIM Rev of Def opp to class cert. 0.6 $525.00 $315.00 610 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-07-09 MTG with COCSL re [REDACTED] 1.0 $525.00 $525.00 611 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-07-09 PC with SSB re [REDACTED] 0.1 $525.00 $52.50 WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-07-09 ATTENDANCE AT ZOOM WITH COCOUNSEL RE: RESPONSE TO CLASS 1.0 $585.00 $585.00 612 CERTIFICATION [MCA] LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-07-09 team call re reply brief 1.0 $645.00 $645.00 613 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-07-09 Review disclosures and evidence and examine [REDACTED] 0.3 $645.00 $193.50 614 615 LLR Santiago Kling 2025-07-09 Reply Brief Work 6.0 $225.00 $1,350.00 W&S Peter Winebrake 2025-07-09 Prelim rev of def's class cert opp brief and attend Teams mtg w/ all def csl re 1.7 $840.00 $1,428.00 616 [REDACTED] WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-07-10 REVIEW OF OUTLINE OF RESPONSE RE CLASS CERTIFICATION; TELEPHONE 1.1 $250.00 $275.00 617 CONFERENCE WITH COCOUNSEL RE: [REDACTED] 618 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-07-10 REVIEW OF DOCUMENTS: PREPARATION OF [REDACTED] 1.5 $250.00 $375.00 619 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-07-10 PREPARATION OF CORRESPONDENCE TO COCOUNSEL RE: [REDACTED] 0.2 $250.00 $50.00 WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-07-10 TELEPHONE CONFERENCE WITH SARAH SCHALMAN BERGEN RE: [_____________] 0.2 $585.00 $117.00 620 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-07-10 Meeting with paralegals re: [REDACTED] 0.9 $645.00 $580.50 621 Entries in red have been reduced. Case 2:21-cv-03643-JDW Document 149 Filed 09/15/26 Page 44 of 60 Approved Fees A B C D E F G LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-07-10 meeting with paralegal re [REDACTED] 0.4 $645.00 $258.00 622 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-07-10 Draft reply brief 2.4 $645.00 $1,548.00 623 624 LLR Santiago Kling 2025-07-10 Reply Memo work, writing up a memo for Sarah [REDACTED] 2.0 $225.00 $450.00 625 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-07-11 REVIEW OF DOCUMENTS: PREPARATION OF [REDACTED] 4.2 $250.00 $1,050.00 626 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-07-11 REV T. Thomas deposition and draft [REDACTED] 1.1 $525.00 $577.50 627 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-07-12 REVIEW OF DOCUMENTS: PREPARATION OF [REDACTED] 5.0 $250.00 $1,250.00 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-07-13 Review opposition brief and compare to data declaration; identify data topics 1.7 $645.00 $1,096.50 unaddressed in declaration despite repeated requests and edit draft meet and 628 confer correspondence LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-07-13 Review exhibits in reply brief re: data to respond to GKennedy email re: data 2.1 $645.00 $1,354.50 declaration; review [REDACTED]; review [_____________]; draft correspondence to GKennedy regarding missing work area information, and spoliation issues 629 regarding SPSS WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-07-14 REVIEW OF UPS'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION 0.4 $250.00 $100.00 630 AND [REDACTED] LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-07-14 Draft reply brief 2.1 $645.00 $1,354.50 631 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-07-14 Review initial opp to class certification and [REDACTED] draft reply; review newly 3.5 $645.00 $2,257.50 632 produced declarations; research case law; draft reply brief LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-07-14 Draft reply 3.8 $645.00 $2,451.00 633 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-07-14 Finalize and send data correspondence to GKennedy; review [REDACTED]; confer 0.7 $645.00 $451.50 634 with KC and DA and send same WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-07-15 REVIEW OF DOCUMENTS: PREPARATION OF [REDACTED] 4.6 $250.00 $1,150.00 635 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-07-16 PREPARATION OF CORRESPONDENCE TO SARAH SCHALMAN-BERGEN 1.5 $250.00 $375.00 636 [REDACTED WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-07-16 REVIEW OF DOCUMENTS: PREPARATION OF [REDACTED] 5.4 $250.00 $1,350.00 637 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-07-16 Conduct research to support motion to preclude 1.2 $525.00 $630.00 638 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-07-16 Review class certification and opposition filing; review correspondence re reply 1.0 $525.00 $525.00 639 briefing Entries in red have been reduced. Case 2:21-cv-03643-JDW Document 149 Filed 09/15/26 Page 45 of 60 Approved Fees A B C D E F G LLR Krysten Connon 2025-07-16 Review data declaration and correspondence; participate in meet and confer call 2.3 $525.00 $1,207.50 640 with opposing counsel; confer with [BLANK] 641 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-07-17 REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE FROM DEIRDRE AARON [REDACTED] 0.2 $250.00 $50.00 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-07-17 REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE FROM SARAH SCHALMAN-BERGEN TO GARRETT 0.2 $250.00 $50.00 KENNEDY RE: DATA DECLARATION REVISIONS AND CLASSIFICATION CODES ; 642 [REDACTED] [MCA] 643 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-07-17 REVIEW OF DOCUMENTS; PREPARATION OF [REDACTED] 8.1 $250.00 $2,025.00 644 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-07-17 Begin REV of palmer tr. 0.3 $525.00 $157.50 645 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-07-17 REV draft [REDACTED] and email SSB re same. 0.2 $525.00 $105.00 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-07-17 Confer with DA and SB re [REDACTED]; review prior correspondence and discovery 7.5 $525.00 $3,937.50 responses; [REDACTED] conduct research re [REDACTED]e; draft motion to 646 preclude and/or strike WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-07-17 REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE FROM ALL COUNSEL RE: DATA DECLARATION 0.2 $585.00 $117.00 647 [MCA] WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-07-18 REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE FROM SARAH SCHALMAN-BERGEN RE: 1.1 $250.00 $275.00 [REDACTED] PREPARATION OF 648 CORRESPONDENCE TO COCOUNSEL RE: [REDACTED] WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-07-18 CONFERENCE WITH RE: [REDACTED] PREPARATION OF CORRESPONDENCE TO 0.9 $250.00 $225.00 COCOUNSEL [REDACTED]; PREPARATION OF CORRESPONDENCE TO 649 COCOUNSEL [REDACTED] WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-07-18 REVIEW OF [REDACTED] AND PREPARATION [REDACTED] PREPARATION OF 2.1 $250.00 $525.00 650 [REDACTED]E; REVIEW OF PROPOSED [REDACTED] LLR Krysten Connon 2025-07-18 Draft motion to strike; confer with SSB and BS [REDACTED] confer with SS8 re 4.5 $525.00 $2,362.50 651 [REDACTED] LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-07-18 Draft reply brief; meet with paralegal re [REDACTED]; meet with paralegal 5.6 $645.00 $3,612.00 652 regarding [REDACTED] LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-07-18 Review and respond GKennedy email regarding data declaration; draft and send 0.5 $645.00 $322.50 653 responsive email and confer with KC re; LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-07-18 Late added entry- Meet and Confer with GKennedy and defense regarding data 2.3 $645.00 $1,483.50 declaration; prep for same and follow up discussion with KC re: [_____________] 654 655 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-07-19 Develop reply strategy 0.5 $525.00 $262.50 656 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-07-19 Draft motion to strike and conduct research re same 5.0 $525.00 $2,625.00 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-07-19 Research [REDACTED] draft opposition section 2.6 $645.00 $1,677.00 657 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-07-19 Draft reply; [REDACTED] confer with KC re: [REDACTED] 3.1 $645.00 $1,999.50 658 659 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-07-20 Confer with SSB re [REDACTED] 0.2 $525.00 $105.00 660 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-07-20 Draft motion to strike and conduct research re same 5.1 $525.00 $2,677.50 Entries in red have been reduced. Case 2:21-cv-03643-JDW Document 149 Filed 09/15/26 Page 46 of 60 Approved Fees A B C D E F G 661 W&S Peter Winebrake 2025-07-20 Legal rsh for class cert reply brief and email cocsl re same. 0.5 $840.00 $420.00 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-07-20 Draft reply 6.4 $645.00 $4,128.00 662 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-07-21 REVIEW OF DOCUMENTS; PREPARATION OF [REDACTED] FOR PLAINTIFF'S CLASS 1.9 $250.00 $475.00 663 CERTIFICATION REPLY RE: MCA EXEMPTION [MCA] 664 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-07-21 REV SSB drafts [REDACTED] and email re same. 0.2 $525.00 $105.00 665 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-07-21 Further REV of Palmer depo. 0.6 $525.00 $315.00 666 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-07-21 Conduct research for and draft motion to preclude/strike 6.1 $525.00 $3,202.50 667 WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-07-21 REVIEW OF SUPPLEMENTAL PRODUCTION [MCA] 0.5 $585.00 $292.50 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-07-21 Draft reply 3.3 $645.00 $2,128.50 668 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-07-22 REVIEW OF COORESPONDANCE FROM DEIRDRE AARON RE [REDACTED]; 0.3 $250.00 $75.00 669 REVISION OF [REDACTED] [MCA] 670 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-07-22 REVIEW OF DOCUMENTS; PREPARATION OF [REDACTED] 6.7 $250.00 $1,675.00 671 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-07-22 REV current drafts of reply brief, motion to strike. 0.7 $525.00 $367.50 672 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-07-22 Draft portion of reply brief. 0.4 $525.00 $210.00 673 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-07-22 Further Rev [REDACTED] 1.6 $525.00 $840.00 674 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-07-22 MTG with SSB, KC re [REDACTED] 0.7 $525.00 $367.50 675 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-07-22 Confer with SSB re [REDACTED] 0.3 $525.00 $157.50 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-07-22 Draft Motion to Strike/Predude and index; conduct research re same; confer with 7.9 $525.00 $4,147.50 676 SSB and DA re same; compile and review exhibits ISO same LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-07-22 draft reply; confer with KC and DA re [REDACTED] 2.8 $645.00 $1,806.00 677 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-07-22 call with KC and DA re [REDACTED] 1.0 $645.00 $645.00 678 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-07-22 Draft reply brief 4.9 $645.00 $3,160.50 679 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-07-22 draft reply 4.2 $645.00 $2,709.00 680 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-07-23 REVIEW OF INTERNAL NOTES AND DOCUMENT PRODUCTION AND PREPARATION 4.8 $250.00 $1,200.00 OF [REDACTED]; PREPARATION OF INDEX OF PROPOSED EXHIBITS [MCA] 681 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-07-23 REVIEW OF NEWLY PRODUCED DATA RE PACKAGE SCANS [MCA] 0.6 $250.00 $150.00 682 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-07-23 REVIEW OF DRAFT MOTION TO EXCLUDE; PREPARATION OF CORRESPONDENCE 1.1 $250.00 $275.00 TO COCOUNSEL [REDACTED] 683 Entries in red have been reduced. Case 2:21-cv-03643-JDW Document 149 Filed 09/15/26 Page 47 of 60 Approved Fees A B C D E F G WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-07-23 REVIEW OF AND REVISION OF DRAFT OF REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR 0.9 $250.00 $225.00 CLASS CERTIFICATION; PREPARATION OF CORRESPONDENCE TO COCOUNSEL 684 RE: SAME [MCA] 685 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-07-23 PREPARATION OF CORRESPONDENCE TO COCOUNSEL [REDACTED] 0.7 $250.00 $175.00 686 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-07-23 Review draft of Reply 1.2 $525.00 $630.00 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-07-23 Draft Motion to Strike/Preclude and all component pieces of filing; organize exhibits 5.3 $525.00 $2,782.50 687 LLR Santiago Kling 2025-07-23 Review of Reply brief. Checking citations and cases referenced. 3.0 $225.00 $675.00 688 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-07-24 CORRESPONDENCE FROM SARAH SCHALMAN-BERGEN RE: [REDACTED]; 0.3 $250.00 $75.00 689 PREPARATION OF CORRESPONDENCE TO COCOUNSEL RE: [REDACTED] 690 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-07-24 CONFERENCE WITH COCOUNSEL RE: [REDACTED] 1.0 $250.00 $250.00 691 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-07-24 PC with COCSL re reply brief. 1.0 $525.00 $525.00 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-07-24 PC with PDW re class cert reply. 0.2 $525.00 $105.00 692 693 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-07-24 Further REV of deposition transcripts, exhibits and pull cites. 1.4 $525.00 $735.00 694 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-07-24 Update Motion to Strike 1.4 $525.00 $735.00 695 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-07-24 Review updated Reply brief; confer with SSB re same 1.1 $525.00 $577.50 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-07-24 Update Motion to Strike and finalize exhibits and filing; review and edit reply brief; 13.1 $525.00 $6,877.50 confer with team re [REDACTED]; review data declaration and confer with team re 696 [REDACTED] 697 W&S Peter Winebrake 2025-07-24 Work on reply brief, incl Teams mtg w/all cocsl. 2.2 $840.00 $1,848.00 698 WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-07-24 REVIEW OF AND REVISION OF BRIEF AND EXHIBITS [MCA] 2.0 $585.00 $1,170.00 699 WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-07-24 ATTENDANCE AT ZOOM REPLY BRIEF MEETING WITH COCOUNSEL [MCA] 1.4 $585.00 $819.00 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-07-24 Draft reply; work with paralegals on index and exhibits 1.4 $645.00 $903.00 700 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-07-24 Draft reply; review exhibits; review new documents produced by UPS 6.8 $645.00 $4,386.00 701 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-07-24 Review and edit motion to preclude defense; Confer with KC 2.7 $645.00 $1,741.50 702 703 LLR Santiago Kling 2025-07-24 Review of Reply brief. Checking citations and cases referenced. 3.0 $225.00 $675.00 Entries in red have been reduced. Case 2:21-cv-03643-JDW Document 149 Filed 09/15/26 Page 48 of 60 Approved Fees A B C D E F G WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-07-25 CONFERENCE WITH COCOUNSEL RE: [REDACTED] REVISION OF REPLY IN 11.6 $250.00 $2,900.00 SUPPORT OF CLASS CERTIFICATION; PREPARATION OF CORRESPONDENCE TO COCOUNSEL WITH SAME; PREPARATION OF CORRESPONDENCE TO COCOUNSEL RE; [REDACTED]D PREPARATION OF CORRESPONDENCE TO SARAH SCHALMAN- BERGEN [REDACTED] CONFERENCE WITH SARAH SCHALMAN-BERGEN RE [REDACTED] PREPARATION OF FINAL EXHIBITS AND EXHIBIT INDEX FOR FILING; PREPARATION OF CORRESPONDENCE TO COCOUNSEL [REDACTED]; CONFERENCE WITH SARAH SCHALMAN-BERGEN RE [REDACTED] [MCA] 704 705 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-07-25 REV updated reply brief and send suggestions to COCSL. 0.3 $525.00 $157.50 706 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-07-25 PC with PDW re draft of reply. 0.1 $525.00 $52.50 707 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-07-25 Review updated Reply 1.5 $525.00 $787.50 708 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-07-25 Finalize Motion to Preclude/Strike; confer with SSB re [REDACTED] 3.0 $525.00 $1,575.00 709 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-07-25 Finalize Motion to Preclude/Strike and all filing parts 1.3 $525.00 $682.50 W&S Peter Winebrake 2025-07-25 Rev further revised class cert reply brief and make some more suggestions and pc 0.5 $840.00 $420.00 710 w/ DAA re same. LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-07-25 Corr with PWinebrake re [REDACTED]; Draft reply; meeting [REDACTED]; meet 8.0 $645.00 $5,160.00 with Brian re: [REDACTED]; finalize and file reply; review PWinebrake edits and incorporate same; call with team re: [REDACTED]; review data declaration; File 711 Motion to Preclude and Strike 712 W&S Peter Winebrake 2025-07-27 Rev final docketed version of class cert reply brief. 0.3 $840.00 $252.00 W&S Peter Winebrake 2025-07-27 Rev final docketed version of brief in support of motion to strike MCA defense and 0.5 $840.00 $420.00 catch-up entry for of recent emails and attachments leading to same. 713 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-07-28 Send courtesy copies to Judge Wolson pursuant to court procedures 0.6 $645.00 $387.00 714 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-07-28 [REDACTED]; research [REDACTED] draft and send correspondence to co counsel 2.8 $645.00 $1,806.00 715 re: [REDACTED] WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-07-29 REVIEW OF [REDACTED]; PREPARATION OF [REDACTED]; PREPARATION OF 3.7 $250.00 $925.00 CORRESPONDANCE TO COUNSEL WITH SAME; INTEROFFICE CONFERENCE WITH [REDACTED]; INTEROFFICE CONFERENCE WITH RYAN ALLEN HANCOCK RE: SAME; [REDACTED] PREPARATION OF CORRESPONDANCE TO COCOUNSEL [REDACTED] 716 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-08-02 Review Judge Wolson sanction fee orders; Draft motion for fees 4.0 $645.00 $2,580.00 717 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-08-03 Draft fee motion 4.1 $645.00 $2,644.50 718 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-08-06 Fee Motion; coordinate records 0.2 $645.00 $129.00 719 Entries in red have been reduced. Case 2:21-cv-03643-JDW Document 149 Filed 09/15/26 Page 49 of 60 Approved Fees A B C D E F G 720 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-08-09 Review Opposition to Motion to Preclude; outline Reply ISO same 2.5 $525.00 $1,312.50 721 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-08-10 Outline Reply ISO Motion to Preclude 1.5 $525.00 $787.50 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-08-10 Review opposition to motion to preclude and confer with KC re Same 0.3 $645.00 $193.50 722 723 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-08-11 Draft reply ISO Motion to Preclude 4.1 $525.00 $2,152.50 724 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-08-12 Draft reply ISO motion to preclude; conduct research in support of same 11.8 $525.00 $6,195.00 725 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-08-13 Draft reply in support of motion to preclude 10.9 $525.00 $5,722.50 726 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-08-14 Draft reply ISO motion to preclude 2.2 $525.00 $1,155.00 727 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-08-14 Review edits to reply brief; update draft 2.1 $525.00 $1,102.50 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-08-14 Update draft reply brief; draft reply brief 5.5 $525.00 $2,887.50 728 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-08-14 Review and edit reply brief; Confer with KC re; same 0.8 $645.00 $516.00 729 730 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-08-15 Finalize and file reply brief 2.6 $525.00 $1,365.00 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-08-15 Review and edit reply brief; Confer with KC re; same 0.2 $645.00 $129.00 731 732 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-09-09 Review and edit draft motion for fees; review case law 2.5 $525.00 $1,312.50 733 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-09-10 Edit Fee motion 5.0 $525.00 $2,625.00 734 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-09-11 Edit Fee motion 6.0 $525.00 $3,150.00 LLR Sarah Schalman-Bergen 2025-09-11 Edit and finalize fee motion 1.5 $645.00 $967.50 735 736 737 $499,749.50 Entries in red have been reduced. Case 2:21-cv-03643-JDW Document 149 Filed 09/15/26 Page 50 of 60 Unapproved Fees A B C D E F G 1 Firm Timekeeper Date Description Time Rate Fees LLR Krysten Connon 2025-02-19 FRE 408 - draft letter re [REDACTED] and confer 1.2 $525.00 $630.00 2 with team re same LLR Sarah Schalman- 2025-02-20 Review and edit proposed settlement 0.3 $645.00 $193.50 3 Bergen correspondence 4 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-02-25 FRE 408 Call 0.5 $525.00 $262.50 WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-02-25 ATTENDANCE AT ZOOM RE: [REDACTED] 0.2 $585.00 $117.00 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-02-25 PC with DEFCSL, COCSL re revisiting settlement 0.4 $525.00 $210.00 6 discussions. LLR Sarah Schalman- 2025-02-25 Call with defense re settlement and f/up re same 0.5 $645.00 $322.50 7 Bergen LLR Sarah Schalman- 2025-04-01 Review arbitration agreement and confer re: 0.4 $645.00 $258.00 8 Bergen [REDACTED] LLR Krysten Connon 2025-04-03 Review arbitration screen shots produced; 2 $525.00 $1,050.00 conduct preliminary research on [REDACTED]; confer with opposing counsel regarding 9 arbitration issues LLR Krysten Connon 2025-04-08 Conduct research [REDACTED]; review 2.8 $525.00 $1,470.00 arbitration agreementsand screen shots 10 produced LLR Sarah Schalman- 2025-04-08 Review arbitration agreement and confer with KC 0.4 $645.00 $258.00 11 Bergen re: [REDACTED] 12 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-04-15 Update draft RFPs re arbitration 1.2 $525.00 $630.00 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-04-16 Draft emails and exchange emails with opposing 0.5 $525.00 $262.50 counsel re arbitration and discovery conferral 13 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-04-18 Confer with opposing counsel re arbitration; 2.1 $525.00 $1,102.50 confer with SSB and DA re same; review 14 stipulation Case 2:21-cv-03643-JDW Document 149 Filed 09/15/26 Page 51 of 60 Unapproved Fees A B C D E F G LLR Krysten Connon 2025-04-22 Review documents produced for technical issues 5.1 $525.00 $2,677.50 and confer with paralegal support and Everlaw re same; draft follow up conferral email to opposing counsel re discovery; review data produced for follow up; review arbitration information produced and confer with opposing counsel re same; discuss case strategy with DA and SSB 15 W&S Peter Winebrake 2025-04-23 Rev stip and order re dln for motion to compel 0.1 $840.00 $84.00 16 arbitration and related discovery. LLR Krysten Connon 2025-04-30 Confer with team re [REDACTED] review 2.5 $525.00 $1,312.50 arbitration production and conduct research re 17 [REDACTED] WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-05-02 TELEPHONE CONFERENCE WITH DEVIN 0.8 $585.00 $468.00 WHITMAN RE [REDACTED] TELEPHONE CONFERENCE WITH COCOUNSEL RE: 18 [REDACTED] LLR Krysten Connon 2025-05-25 Review UPS Motion to Compel Arbitration; 2.2 $525.00 $1,155.00 conduct legal research regarding [REDACTED] 19 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-05-26 Review UPS Motion to Compel Arbitration; 4.3 $525.00 $2,257.50 20 conduct legal research re same 21 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-05-27 REV def motion to compel arbitration. 0.3 $525.00 $157.50 W&S Peter Winebrake 2025-05-27 Prelim rev of def's motion to compel arbitration 0.5 $840.00 $420.00 22 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-05-27 ATTENDANCE AT DEPOSITION OF CLIENT DEVIN 4.0 $250.00 $1,000.00 23 WHITMAN [MCA] LLR Krysten Connon 2025-05-27 Prepare for and attend depositions of T. Thomas 8.1 $525.00 $4,252.50 24 and D. Whitman WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-05-27 ATTENDANCE AT ZOOM DEPOSITION OF DEVIN 4.0 $585.00 $2,340.00 25 WHITMAN [MCA] Case 2:21-cv-03643-JDW Document 149 Filed 09/15/26 Page 52 of 60 Unapproved Fees A B C D E F G LLR Sarah Schalman- 2025-05-27 Defend Whitman deposition 4.2 $645.00 $2,709.00 26 Bergen WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-05-28 PREPARATION FOR DEPOSITION; ATTENDANCE 4.3 $250.00 $1,075.00 AT DEPOSITION OF LOGAN GREEN [MCA] 27 28 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-05-28 L. Green deposition 3.8 $525.00 $1,995.00 WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-05-28 ATTENDANCE AT ZOOM DEPOSITION OF LOGAN 3.6 $585.00 $2,106.00 29 GREEN [MCA] LLR Sarah Schalman- 2025-05-28 Deposition of Logan Green 3.8 $645.00 $2,451.00 30 Bergen W&S Peter Winebrake 2025-05-30 Arbitrability rsh re [REDACTED] etc and draft 3 $840.00 $2,520.00 revise and circulate proposed non-opposition statement re def’s pending motion to compel 31 arbitration. W&S Peter Winebrake 2025-06-02 Finalize and file response to motion to compel 0.3 $840.00 $252.00 arbitration of 2 plfs; rev and save final version of 32 same W&S Peter Winebrake 2025-06-09 Rev and save order compelling 2 plfs to 0.1 $840.00 $84.00 33 arbitration; var emails re same. LLR Krysten Connon 2025-05-06 Deposition prep with SSB; develop [REDACTED]; 2.5 $525.00 $1,312.50 correspondence to opposing counsel re Ditmars 34 deposition LLR Krysten Connon 2025-05-07 Deposition of A Woodruff [REDACTED] Internal 9.1 $525.00 $4,777.50 35 discussions re same WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-05-07 ATTENDANCE AT ZOOM DEPOSITION OF ANGIE 7.0 $585.00 $4,095.00 36 WOODRUFF [MCA] WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-05-08 ATTENDANCE AT ZOOM DEPOSITION OF JEAN 4.7 $585.00 $2,749.50 37 DITMARS [MCA] WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-05-08 ATTENDANCE AT ZOOM DEPOSITION 1.5 $585.00 $877.50 38 [_____________] Case 2:21-cv-03643-JDW Document 149 Filed 09/15/26 Page 53 of 60 Unapproved Fees A B C D E F G WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-05-09 ATTENDANCE AT ZOOM DEPOSITION 1.0 $585.00 $585.00 39 [REDACTED] WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-05-14 ATTENDANCE AT ZOOM DEPOSITION 1.0 $585.00 $585.00 40 [REDACTED] WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-05-14 ATTENDANCE AT ZOOM DEPOSITION 1.0 $585.00 $585.00 41 [REDACTED] LLR Krysten Connon 2025-05-15 Prepare for and attend Ditmars deposition; 4.8 $525.00 $2,520.00 42 confer with SSB re case strategy WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-05-15 ATTENDANCE AT JEAN DITMARS DEPOSITION 5.3 $585.00 $3,100.50 43 [MCA] LLR Krysten Connon 2025-05-16 Confer with opposing counsel re discovery; 7.4 $525.00 $3,885.00 44 prepare for and attend Speller deposition WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-05-16 ATTENDANCE AT BRIAN SPELLER DEPOSITION 5.3 $585.00 $3,100.50 45 [MCA] LLR Krysten Connon 2025-05-20 Prepare for Named Plaintiff deposition; review 2.2 $525.00 $1,155.00 correspondence regarding scheduling and confer 46 with SSB re same WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-05-21 ATTENDANCE AT ZOOM DEPOSITION 1.5 $585.00 $877.50 47 [REDACTED] LLR Krysten Connon 2025-05-22 Prepare for named Plaintiff deposition; organize 3.3 $525.00 $1,732.50 schedule re discovery; review documents produced and organize documents; confer w/ team re discovery needed and plan re same 48 49 WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-05-22 ATTENDANCE AT DEPOSITION [REDACTED] 1.5 $585.00 $877.50 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-05-23 Review documents for Thomas deposition; confer 0.6 $525.00 $315.00 50 with team re same WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-05-27 ATTENDANCE AT ZOOM DEPOSITION OF 2.5 $585.00 $1,462.50 51 TERRENCE THOMPSON [SIC] [MCA] LLR Sarah Schalman- 2025-05-27 Thomas deposition 3.6 $645.00 $2,322.00 52 Bergen Case 2:21-cv-03643-JDW Document 149 Filed 09/15/26 Page 54 of 60 Unapproved Fees A B C D E F G 53 LLR Santiago Kling 2025-05-28 Brian Speller Deposition [REDACTED] 1.0 $225.00 $225.00 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-05-29 Review documents for K Green deposition; attend 6.2 $525.00 $3,255.00 54 K Green deposition WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-05-29 ATTENDANCE AT DEPOSITION OF KERI GREEN 4.8 $585.00 $2,808.00 55 [MCA] LLR Krysten Connon 2025-06-08 Prepare for upcoming depositions and confer 0.9 $525.00 $472.50 56 with SSB re same 57 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-06-10 Speller deposition; confer with SSB re same 3.1 $525.00 $1,627.50 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-06-10 Schouman deposition; confer with SSB re same 3.2 $525.00 $1,680.00 58 WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-06-10 ATTENDANCE AT ZOOM DEPOSITION OF 2.0 $585.00 $1,170.00 59 SCHOUMAN [MCA] WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-06-10 ATTENDANCE AT ZOOM DEPOSITION OF 2.7 $585.00 $1,579.50 60 SPELLER [MCA] LLR Sarah Schalman- 2025-06-10 Schouman deposition and follow up 3.2 $645.00 $2,064.00 61 Bergen LLR Krysten Connon 2025-06-12 Carr deposition and confer with SSB re same 4.2 $525.00 $2,205.00 62 WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-06-12 ATTENDANCE AT ZOOM DEPOSITION OF FRED 2.0 $585.00 $1,170.00 64 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-06-13 Palmer deposition 4.2 $525.00 $2,205.00 65 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-06-13 Palmer depo prep 0.5 $525.00 $262.50 WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-06-13 ATTENDANCE AT ZOOM DEPOSITION OF JAMES 4.0 $585.00 $2,340.00 LLR Sarah Schalman- 2025-06-13 Palmer depo and follow up 4.7 $645.00 $3,031.50 67 Bergen LLR Sarah Schalman- 2025-06-13 Prep for palmer depo; confer with DA re : same; 0.8 $645.00 $516.00 68 Bergen review depo outline 69 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-06-16 Capone Deposition 3.5 $525.00 $1,837.50 70 LLR Santiago Kling 2025-03-26 Indexing work 5.0 $225.00 $1,125.00 71 LLR Santiago Kling 2025-04-03 Indexing Discovery 5.0 $225.00 $1,125.00 Case 2:21-cv-03643-JDW Document 149 Filed 09/15/26 Page 55 of 60 Unapproved Fees A B C D E F G 72 LLR Santiago Kling 2025-04-08 Indexing Production Work 5.0 $225.00 $1,125.00 73 LLR Santiago Kling 2025-04-15 Indexing Production Work 5.0 $225.00 $1,125.00 74 LLR Santiago Kling 2025-04-22 Indexing Production Work 1.0 $225.00 $225.00 75 LLR Santiago Kling 2025-05-01 Deposition Exhibit Prep 8.5 $225.00 $1,912.50 LLR Santiago Kling 2025-05-01 Malone Depo Prep, putting together the binders 6.0 $225.00 $1,350.00 76 for the deposition 77 LLR Santiago Kling 2025-05-02 Deposition Prep 5.0 $225.00 $1,125.00 78 LLR Santiago Kling 2025-05-02 Finalizing deposition binders. 4.0 $225.00 $900.00 79 LLR Santiago Kling 2025-05-05 Tagging [REDACTED] 5.0 $225.00 $1,125.00 LLR Santiago Kling 2025-05-23 Creating a folder with the deposition exhibits. 1.0 $225.00 $225.00 80 LLR Santiago Kling 2025-06-05 Gathering deposition exhibits for the court 1.0 $225.00 $225.00 reporter, finalized a folder and sent via Egnyte 81 link. LLR Santiago Kling 2025-06-17 Creating a folder for co-counsel with the 0.5 $225.00 $112.50 necessary documents requested. Sent via Egnyte 82 link. LLR Santiago Kling 2025-06-20 Downloading renewed class certification 0.5 $225.00 $112.50 83 exhibits, LLR Santiago Kling 2025-06-20 Correcting the title on each of the downloaded 1.0 $225.00 $225.00 exhibits for the renewed class cert 84 85 LLR Santiago Kling 2025-07-24 Slipsheeting exhibits for the reply bief. 0.5 $225.00 $112.50 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-07-24 PREPARATION OF FINAL EXHIBITS' REVISION OF 3.5 $250.00 $875.00 EXHIBIT INDEX FOR FILING [MCA] 86 LLR Santiago Kling 2025-07-28 Courtesy copy work downloading all necessary 1.5 $225.00 $337.50 exhibits, and adding them into a folder. 87 WWD Ryan Hancock 2024-10-08 ATTENDANCE AT ZOOM WITH ALL COUNSEL RE: 0.2 $585.00 $117.00 Case 2:21-cv-03643-JDW Document 149 Filed 09/15/26 Page 56 of 60 Unapproved Fees A B C D E F G 89 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2024-10-08 PC with DEFCSL re schedule. 0.3 $525.00 $157.50 WWD Ryan Hancock 2024-11-21 ATTENDANCE AT RULE 408 AND DISCOVERY 3.0 $585.00 $1,755.00 91 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2024-12-17 Call with court re MCA discovery. 0.5 $525.00 $262.50 92 LLR Krysten Connon 2024-12-18 Prepare for and participate in m/c call 1.0 $525.00 $525.00 93 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2024-12-20 M&C with DEFCSL re MCA discovery. 0.5 $525.00 $262.50 94 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-01-10 M&C with defcsl re status of ESI. 0.2 $525.00 $105.00 WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-02-27 ATTENDANCE AT ZOOM WITH ALL COUNSEL RE: 0.5 $585.00 $292.50 95 DISCOVERY ISSUES MEET AND CONFER 96 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-03-10 Meet and confer call with opposing counsel 1 $525.00 $525.00 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-03-24 Meet and confer with COCSL, DEFCSL re 0.6 $525.00 $315.00 97 outstanding MCA discovery issues. WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-04-11 ATTENDANCE AT TELEPHONE CONFERENCE 0.3 $585.00 $175.50 98 WITH JUDGE WOLSON [MCA] WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-05-05 ATTENDANCE AT ZOOM MEET AND CONFER 1.0 $585.00 $585.00 99 WITH ALL COUNSEL [MCA] WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-05-16 ATTENDANCE AT MEET AND CONFER CALL WITH 0.6 $585.00 $351.00 100 UPS DEFENSE COUNSEL [MCA) W&S Peter Winebrake 2025-05-19 Attend EDPA hearing re various outstanding 3.3 $840.00 $2,772.00 discovery issues; time includes attendance at hearing, preliminary pc w/ SSB to prep; R-T tvl to courthouse; and post-hearing discussions w/ various co-counsel re [REDACTED] 101 WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-05-19 PREPARATION FOR MOTION TO COMPEL 6.0 $585.00 $3,510.00 HEARING; ATTENDANCE AT COURT HEARING IN LLR Krysten Connon 2025-05-19 Prepare for and attend hearing; confer with team 6.1 $525.00 $3,202.50 103 re [REDACTED] W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-07-16 PC with DEFCSL, COCSL Re data declaration, 0.5 $525.00 $262.50 104 potential site visits. Case 2:21-cv-03643-JDW Document 149 Filed 09/15/26 Page 57 of 60 Unapproved Fees A B C D E F G WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-07-16 ATTENDANCE AT MEET AND CONFER RE: DATA 1.4 $585.00 $819.00 105 DECLARATION [MCA] 106 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-05-31 Draft class certification motion 2.9 $525.00 $1,522.50 107 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-06-02 Draft class certification motion 1.5 $525.00 $787.50 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-06-06 Draft class certification brief and conduct 3.1 $525.00 $1,627.50 108 research re same 109 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-06-07 Draft motion for class certification 5.5 $525.00 $2,887.50 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-06-08 Conduct research in support of motion for class 6.6 $525.00 $3,465.00 110 certification; draft motion 111 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-06-10 Draft class certification brief 1.3 $525.00 $682.50 112 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-06-11 Draft certification brief 6.8 $525.00 $3,570.00 113 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-06-12 Edit class certification brief 1.2 $525.00 $630.00 114 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-06-13 Update class certification brief 1.1 $525.00 $577.50 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-06-15 Update class certification brief; draft component 4.6 $525.00 $2,415.00 115 parts of filing; compile exhibits LLR Sarah Schalman- 2025-06-15 review and edit class cert brief; confer with KC re: 3.20 $645.00 $2,064.00 116 Bergen same LLR Krysten Connon 2025-06-17 Update class certification brief; confer with SSB 6.5 $525.00 $3,412.50 re same; coordinate exhibits; update component 117 parts of class [BLANK] LLR Sarah Schalman- 2025-06-17 Review and edit class cert brief 0.80 $645.00 $516.00 118 Bergen 119 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-06-17 REV draft class cert brief. 0.60 $525.00 $315.00 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-06-17 REVIEW OF DEPOSITION TRANSCRIPTS; REVIEW 4.00 $250.00 $1,000.00 OF DRAFT MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION; TELEPHONE CONFERENCE WITH COCOUNSEL 120 RE: SAME [MCA] LLR Krysten Connon 2025-06-18 Update class certification brief and component 3.2 $525.00 $1,680.00 121 parts of filing LLR Sarah Schalman- 2025-06-18 Review and edit class cert brief; confer with KC 1.30 $645.00 $838.50 122 Bergen Case 2:21-cv-03643-JDW Document 149 Filed 09/15/26 Page 58 of 60 Unapproved Fees A B C D E F G 123 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-06-19 Finalize class certification brief 1.6 $525.00 $840.00 W&S Peter Winebrake 2025-06-19 Edit firm declaration for class cert papers re 0.2 $840.00 $168.00 124 class csl appointment. LLR Krysten Connon 2025-06-20 Finalize class certification brief and component 5.9 $525.00 $3,097.50 pieces of filing; finalize exhibits; file motion and coordinate courtesy copies and transmit same 125 LLR Sarah Schalman- 2025-06-20 finalize class cert and comply with court order 1.50 $645.00 $967.50 126 Bergen regarding courtesy copies LLR Sarah Schalman- 2025-06-20 Finalize class cert brief 0.40 $645.00 $258.00 127 Bergen WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-06-20 PREPARATION OF CLASS CERT DECLARATION; 0.5 $585.00 $292.50 PREPARATION OF CORRESPONDENCE TO KRYSTEN CONNON WITH SAME 128 129 W&S Deirdre Aaron 2025-06-23 REV filed class cert motion and save to file. 0.20 $525.00 $105.00 WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-07-10 REVIEW OF PROPOSED FIRST DRAFT OF BRIEF IN 0.4 $585.00 $234.00 SUPPORT OF CLASS CERTIFICATION 130 WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-03-18 ATTENDANCE AT ZOOM EVERLAW TRAINING FOR 0.5 $585.00 $292.50 LLR Santiago Kling 2025-07-09 UPS Trial Binder prep double checking that all 2.0 $225.00 $450.00 132 filed documents were in our folder 133 LLR Santiago Kling 2025-07-11 Trial Binder Work 8.0 $225.00 $1,800.00 134 LLR Santiago Kling 2025-07-15 Trial Binder Work 6.0 $225.00 $1,350.00 135 WWD Ryan Hancock 2024-10-14 ATTENDANCE AT [REDACTED] 0.5 $585.00 $292.50 136 WWD Ryan Hancock 2024-11-21 ATTENDANCE AT ZOOM RE: [REDACTED] 0.5 $585.00 $292.50 WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-01-17 TELEPHONE CONFERENCE WITH [REDACTED] 0.2 $585.00 $117.00 137 WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-01-28 TELEPHONE CONFERENCE WITH [REDACTED] 0.2 $585.00 $117.00 138 Case 2:21-cv-03643-JDW Document 149 Filed 09/15/26 Page 59 of 60 Unapproved Fees A B C D E F G 139 WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-01-30 ATTENDANCE AT ZOOM RE: [REDACTED] 1 $585.00 $585.00 140 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-01-30 CONFERENCE WITH [REDACTED] 0.1 $250.00 $25.00 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-01-30 TELEPHONE CONFERENCE WITH [REDACTED] 1.0 $250.00 $250.00 141 142 WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-02-28 ATTENDANCE AT ZOOM RE: [REDACTED] 0.5 $585.00 $292.50 WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-03-03 PREPARATION [REDACTED] PREPARATION OF 0.4 $585.00 $234.00 143 [REDACTED] 144 WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-03-05 TELEPHONE CONFERENCE [REDACTED] 0.1 $585.00 $58.50 WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-03-06 ATTENDANCE AT ZOOM CHECK IN RE 3.2 $585.00 $1,872.00 [REDACTED]; TELEPHONE CONFERENCE WITH [REDACTED] TELEPHONE CONFERENCE WITH 145 [REDACTED] WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-03-10 PREPARATION OF [REDACTED]N; PREPARATION 0.3 $250.00 $75.00 146 OF [REDACTED] 147 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-03-12 TELEPHONE CONFERENCE [REDACTED] 0.3 $250.00 $75.00 148 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-03-12 TELEPHONE CONFERENCE [REDACTED] 0.5 $250.00 $125.00 149 WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-04-02 REVIEW OF [REDACTED] 0.2 $585.00 $117.00 150 WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-04-03 TELEPHONE CONFERENCE [REDACTED] 2.5 $585.00 $1,462.50 WWD Ryan Hancock 2025-04-04 TELEPHONE CONFERENCE WITH [REDACTED] 0.4 $585.00 $234.00 151 LLR Sarah Schalman- 2025-04-04 Talk to [REDACTED] 0.3 $645.00 $193.50 152 Bergen WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-04-08 REVIEW OF [REDACTED]; REVIEW OF 0.2 $250.00 $50.00 153 [REDACTED] 154 LLR Santiago Kling 2025-04-17 [REDACTED] 4.0 $225.00 $900.00 155 LLR Santiago Kling 2025-04-17 [REDACTED] 6.0 $225.00 $1,350.00 156 LLR Andrew Steptoe 2025-04-17 Helping Santiago Kling [REDACTED] 4.0 $225.00 $900.00 157 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-05-07 Draft [REDACTED] 1.1 $525.00 $577.50 158 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-05-08 Draft [REDACTED] 1.8 $525.00 $945.00 159 LLR Santiago Kling 2025-05-22 [REDACTED] 6.0 $225.00 $1,350.00 Case 2:21-cv-03643-JDW Document 149 Filed 09/15/26 Page 60 of 60 Unapproved Fees A B C D E F G LLR Sarah Schalman- 2025-05-22 Prep [REDACTED] 1.7 $645.00 $1,096.50 160 Bergen 161 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-05-27 Draft [REDACTED] 3.2 $525.00 $1,680.00 162 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-05-28 Draft [REDACTED] 5.2 $525.00 $2,730.00 LLR Sarah Schalman- 2025-05-28 Draft [REDACTED] 1.0 $645.00 $645.00 163 Bergen 164 LLR Krysten Connon 2025-05-29 Draft [REDACTED] 1.9 $525.00 $997.50 165 LLR Santiago Kling 2025-06-20 [REDACTED] 4.0 $225.00 $900.00 166 LLR Santiago Kling 2025-07-03 [REDACTED] 1.5 $225.00 $337.50 167 LLR Santiago Kling 2025-07-03 [REDACTED] 3.0 $225.00 $675.00 168 LLR Santiago Kling 2025-07-17 Work on [REDACTED] 4.0 $225.00 $900.00 169 LLR Santiago Kling 2025-07-18 Work on [REDACTED] 4.0 $225.00 $900.00 170 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-07-24 PREPARATION OF [REDACTED] 0.4 $250.00 $100.00 WWD Brian Shmerling 2025-07-28 REVIEW OF [REDACTED]; PREPARATION OF 1.5 $250.00 $375.00 171 [REDACTED] 172 173 $192,477.00
Michael Malone, et al., on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated v. United Parcel Service, Inc. (Michael Malone, et al., on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated v. United Parcel Service, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.