Michael Lynn Brown v. K.L. Osborne, Warden James P. Kelly Richard A. Young
This text of 56 F.3d 60 (Michael Lynn Brown v. K.L. Osborne, Warden James P. Kelly Richard A. Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
56 F.3d 60
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Michael Lynn BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
K.L. OSBORNE, Warden; James P. Kelly; Richard A. Young,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 95-6229.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 20, 1995.
Decided May 26, 1995.
Michael Lynn Brown, Appellant Pro Se.
Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Brown v. Osborne, No. CA-95-44 (W.D.Va. Jan. 12, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
56 F.3d 60, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19072, 1995 WL 318766, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-lynn-brown-v-kl-osborne-warden-james-p-kel-ca4-1995.