Michael Louis McIntosh v. State of Florida
This text of Michael Louis McIntosh v. State of Florida (Michael Louis McIntosh v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
MICHAEL LOUIS MCINTOSH, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Appellant, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
v. CASE NO. 1D14-1938
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee. ____________________________/
Opinion filed September 23, 2014.
An appeal from the Circuit Court for Clay County. Don H. Lester, Judge.
Michael Louis McIntosh, pro se, Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Angela R. Hensel, Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Michael Louis McIntosh is an inmate at the Suwannee Correctional
Institution Annex in Live Oak. He appeals from an order denying his Motion To
Correct Jail Credit, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.801.
The trial court determined that the record did not demonstrate on its face that McIntosh was entitled to relief. However, it failed to attach to its order any portion
of the record supporting its conclusion. Rule 3.801(e), which incorporates Florida
Rule of Criminal Procedure rule 3.850(f), requires the circuit court to attach to its
order denying a motion seeking additional jail credit records that conclusively
refute the motion. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.801(e); Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(f)(5) (“If
the denial is based on the records in the case, a copy of that portion of the files and
records that conclusively shows that the defendant is entitled to no relief shall be
attached to the final order.”); Geil v. State, 2014 WL 2601681, --- So. 3d --- (Fla.
1st DCA June 11, 2014); Williams v. State, 2014 WL 2862353, --- So. 3d --- (Fla.
4th DCA June 25, 2014). We therefore reverse and remand with directions to the
trial court to attach those portions of the record that conclusively refute McIntosh’s
claims.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
PADOVANO, WETHERELL, and MAKAR, JJ., CONCUR.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Michael Louis McIntosh v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-louis-mcintosh-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2014.