Michael Lee v. United States

D.C. Circuit

Michael Lee v. United States

251 F.2d 915, 102 U.S. App. D.C. 204

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedJanuary 30, 1958

Docket13980

StatusPublished

This text of 251 F.2d 915 (Michael Lee v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Michael Lee v. United States, 251 F.2d 915, 102 U.S. App. D.C. 204 (D.C. Cir. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of assault with intent to kill, assault with a dangerous weapon, and carrying a dang*erous weapon. D.C.Code (1951) §§ 22-501, 22-502, 22-3204. We had reversed a previous conviction, for reasons not here pertinent, and remanded for a new trial. Lee v. United States, 98 U.S.App.D.C. 272, 235 F.2d 219. The new trial has now been held. We find no error affecting substantial rights.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of assault with intent to kill, assault with a dangerous weapon, and carrying a dang*erous weapon. D.C.Code (1951) §§ 22-501, 22-502, 22-3204. We had reversed a previous conviction, for reasons not here pertinent, and remanded for a new trial. Lee v. United States, 98 U.S.App.D.C. 272, 235 F.2d 219. The new trial has now been held. We find no error affecting substantial rights.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

251 F.2d 915, 102 U.S. App. D.C. 204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-lee-v-united-states-cadc-1958.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack