Michael Lazarov v. Raymond J. Buchkoe, Warden
Opinion
This appeal from an order denying a writ of habeas corpus was duly heard upon the brief and supplemental brief of the appellant and upon the brief and oral argument of the Solicitor General of Michigan.
And it appearing, for the reasons stated in the oral opinion of United States District Judge Kent and upon the authority of In re Callaham, 348 Mich. 77, 81 N.W.2d 669 (wherein the opinion was written by Chief Justice Dethmers), that the order of the district court in this case should be affirmed;
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
255 F.2d 930 (Michael Lazarov v. Raymond J. Buchkoe, Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.