Michael Lawton v. Fairway Independent Mortgage Corporation

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Michael Lawton v. Fairway Independent Mortgage Corporation

99 A.3d 992, 2014 R.I. LEXIS 123

CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island

DecidedSeptember 25, 2014

Docket2013-180-Appeal

StatusUnpublished

This text of 99 A.3d 992 (Michael Lawton v. Fairway Independent Mortgage Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Michael Lawton v. Fairway Independent Mortgage Corporation, 99 A.3d 992, 2014 R.I. LEXIS 123 (R.I. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The plaintiff, Michael Lawton, appeals from a Superior Court summary judgment in favor of the defendants, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., OneW-est Bank, FSB., and OWB REO, LLC. This case came before the Supreme Court at a session in conference pursuant to Article I, Rule 12A(3)(b) of the Supreme Court Rules of Appellate Procedure. At this time, we proceed to decide this case without further briefing and argument.

This appeal is not properly before the Court. Under “[Article I,] Rule 4(a) [of the Supreme Court Rules of Appellate Procedure], a notice of appeal must be filed ‘within twenty (20) days of the date of the entry of the judgment.’ ” Iozzi v. City of Cranston, 52 A.3d 585, 588 (R.I.2012) (quoting Rule 4(a)). “It is well settled that ‘the time specified in Rule 4(a) is mandatory, and that once the prescribed time has passed there can be no review by way of appeal.’ ” Id. (quoting Wachovia Bank v. Hershberger, 911 A.2d 278, 279-80 (R.I. 2006) (mem.)). Judgment in the instant case was entered on April 11, 2013, and the plaintiff filed his notice of appeal on May 7, 2013, more than twenty days thereafter. Thus, the plaintiff’s notice of appeal was untimely, and this case must be dismissed.

Accordingly, the plaintiffs appeal is denied and dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The plaintiff, Michael Lawton, appeals from a Superior Court summary judgment in favor of the defendants, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., OneW-est Bank, FSB., and OWB REO, LLC. This case came before the Supreme Court at a session in conference pursuant to Article I, Rule 12A(3)(b) of the Supreme Court Rules of Appellate Procedure. At this time, we proceed to decide this case without further briefing and argument.

This appeal is not properly before the Court. Under “[Article I,] Rule 4(a) [of the Supreme Court Rules of Appellate Procedure], a notice of appeal must be filed ‘within twenty (20) days of the date of the entry of the judgment.’ ” Iozzi v. City of Cranston, 52 A.3d 585, 588 (R.I.2012) (quoting Rule 4(a)). “It is well settled that ‘the time specified in Rule 4(a) is mandatory, and that once the prescribed time has passed there can be no review by way of appeal.’ ” Id. (quoting Wachovia Bank v. Hershberger, 911 A.2d 278, 279-80 (R.I. 2006) (mem.)). Judgment in the instant case was entered on April 11, 2013, and the plaintiff filed his notice of appeal on May 7, 2013, more than twenty days thereafter. Thus, the plaintiff’s notice of appeal was untimely, and this case must be dismissed.

Accordingly, the plaintiffs appeal is denied and dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

99 A.3d 992, 2014 R.I. LEXIS 123, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-lawton-v-fairway-independent-mortgage-corporation-ri-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack