Michael Lawrence Reising v. State
This text of Michael Lawrence Reising v. State (Michael Lawrence Reising v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas May 3, 2017
No. 04-17-00191-CR
Michael Lawrence REISING, Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas Trial Court No. 15-1601-CR-B Honorable William Old, Judge Presiding
ORDER
It appears from the record that appellant seeks to appeal the denial of his motion to reduce bail. Appellate courts lack jurisdiction to consider an interlocutory appeal of trial court’s denial of a pretrial motion for bond reduction. Ragston v. State, 424 S.W.3d 49, 51-51 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). In addition, the clerk’s record does not contain a motion to reduce bail or the trial court’s order denying a motion to reduce bail.
It is therefore ORDERED that appellant show cause in writing on or before May 19, 2017 why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All appeal deadlines are suspended pending our determination whether we have jurisdiction over this appeal.
_________________________________ Irene Rios, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 3rd day of May, 2017.
___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Michael Lawrence Reising v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-lawrence-reising-v-state-texapp-2017.