Michael Joseph Kearns v. Gonzales County

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 20, 2007
Docket13-07-00455-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Michael Joseph Kearns v. Gonzales County (Michael Joseph Kearns v. Gonzales County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Michael Joseph Kearns v. Gonzales County, (Tex. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion





NUMBER 13-07-00455-CV



COURT OF APPEALS



THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

______________________________________________________________________

MICHAEL JOSEPH KEARNS, Appellant,



v.



GONZALES COUNTY, ET AL., Appellees.

__________ ____________________________________________________________



On Appeal from the 25th District Court of Gonzales County, Texas.

______________________________________________________________________



MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Yañez, Garza, and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam This matter is before the Court on the appellant's failure to file a brief or reasonably explain his failure to do so. The appellant's brief in the above cause was due on October 17, 2007. On October 24, 2007, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that the brief had not been timely filed and that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from the date of receipt of this letter, appellant reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not significantly injured by the appellant's failure to timely file a brief.

Appellant responded to this Court's directive on November 2, 2007. Appellant contends that he is a "natural private individual who operates on his God given birthrights," and that dismissing this appeal "would be construed as abridging or modifying my substantive rights, therefore I would demand this matter be continued until I file the Appellate Brief."

Appellant has failed to either reasonably explain his failure to file a brief, file a motion for extension of time to file his brief, or file his brief. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM



Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this the 20th day of November, 2007.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Michael Joseph Kearns v. Gonzales County, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-joseph-kearns-v-gonzales-county-texapp-2007.