Michael Jones v. Claudia Wang

Ninth Circuit

Michael Jones v. Claudia Wang

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 19, 2018

Docket12-55995

StatusPublished

This text of Michael Jones v. Claudia Wang (Michael Jones v. Claudia Wang) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Michael Jones v. Claudia Wang, (9th Cir. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL N. JONES, an individual; No. 12-55995 JILL JONES, an individual; G. J., an individual, D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellees, 2:11-cv-02851- SJO-VBK v.

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, ORDER Defendant,

and

DR. CLAUDIA WANG, an individual, Defendant-Appellant.

Filed January 19, 2018

Before: N. Randy Smith and Mary H. Murguia, Circuit Judges, and Stephen M. McNamee, * Senior District Judge.

Order

* The Honorable Stephen M. McNamee, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation. 2 JONES V. WANG

The opinion filed September 21, 2015, and appearing at 802 F.3d 990, is withdrawn. It may not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit. The superseding memorandum will be filed concurrently with this order. The petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc filed on December 4, 2015 is denied as moot (Doc. 52). The parties may file additional petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI