Michael Jerry Duane McGee, II v. Madera Toyota, Chevrolet, et al.

District Court, E.D. California·Decided September 16, 2025·No. 1:25-cv-00704·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 11 MICHAEL JERRY DUANE MCGEE, II, Case No.: 1:25-cv-00704-KES-CDB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING 13 v. ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 14 MADERA TOYOTA, CHEVERLET, et al., Doc. 5 15 Defendants.

16 17 18 Plaintiff Michael Jerry Duane McGee, II is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 19 pauperis in this civil action pursuant to the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3729 (“FCA”). The 20 matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and 21 Local Rule 302. 22 On June 16, 2025, the assigned magistrate judge screened plaintiff’s complaint and issued 23 findings and recommendations recommending that this action be dismissed for failure to state a 24 claim. Doc. 5. Specifically, the findings and recommendations note that plaintiff, proceeding pro 25 se, is prohibited from prosecuting FCA qui tam actions without retaining counsel. See Stoner v. 26 Santa Clara Cnty. Office of Educ., 502 F.3d 1116, 1127 (9th Cir. 2007). And in any event, 27 plaintiff’s complaint lacks any factual allegations of fraud to state a cognizable FCA claim. The findings and recommendations were served on plaintiff and contained notice that 1 | objections were to be filed within fourteen (14) days of service. /d. at 7. Plaintiff has not filed 2 || objections and the time to do so has expired. 3 In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this Court has conducted a de novo review of 4 | this case. After carefully reviewing the file, the Court finds that the findings and 5 || recommendations are supported by the record and proper analysis. 6 Accordingly: 7 1. The findings and recommendations issued June 16, 2025, Doc. 5, are ADOPTED in 8 full; 9 2. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim; and 10 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. 11 12 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. _ 14 Dated: _ September 15, 2025 4h UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Michael Jerry Duane McGee, II v. Madera Toyota, Chevrolet, et al., (E.D. Cal. 2025).

Michael Jerry Duane McGee, II v. Madera Toyota, Chevrolet, et al. (Michael Jerry Duane McGee, II v. Madera Toyota, Chevrolet, et al.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stoner v. Santa Clara County Office of Education
502 F.3d 1116 (Ninth Circuit, 2007)