Michael James Decca, John Anton Slack and Howard Nelson Zinram v. United States

346 F.2d 158, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 5388
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 1, 1965·No. 21974·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Only Decca has prosecuted his appeal in this case. The appeals of Slack and Zinram are dismissed for want of prosecution.

The judgment of conviction and sentence of Decca are affirmed. The search complained of on the motion to suppress *159 evidence was a “border search,” and as such was legal. See Murgia v. United States, 9 Cir., 285 F.2d 14, cert. denied 366 U.S. 977, 81 S.Ct. 1946, 6 L.Ed.2d 1265, and Mansfield v. United States, 5 Cir., 308 F.2d 221.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Michael James Decca, John Anton Slack and Howard Nelson Zinram v. United States, 346 F.2d 158, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 5388 (5th Cir. 1965).

346 F.2d 158 (Michael James Decca, John Anton Slack and Howard Nelson Zinram v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Oscar John Huguez v. United States
406 F.2d 366 (Ninth Circuit, 1969)