Michael James Cassidy v. United States

Ninth Circuit

Michael James Cassidy v. United States

457 F.2d 813

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedMay 11, 1972

Docket71-1861

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 457 F.2d 813 (Michael James Cassidy v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Michael James Cassidy v. United States, 457 F.2d 813 (9th Cir. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The order denying a petition under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 without a hearing is affirmed.

On the pleading submitted by Cassidy, we find it was not erroneous to deny a hearing. The court may appraise a petition by what is reasonably credible.

Further, no showing was made as to why the point sought to be made this time was not tendered in connection with prior proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The order denying a petition under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 without a hearing is affirmed.

On the pleading submitted by Cassidy, we find it was not erroneous to deny a hearing. The court may appraise a petition by what is reasonably credible.

Further, no showing was made as to why the point sought to be made this time was not tendered in connection with prior proceedings.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

457 F.2d 813, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-james-cassidy-v-united-states-ca9-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack