Michael J. Spence II v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Michael J. Spence II v. State

DecidedAugust 10, 2012

DocketA12A2158

StatusPublished

This text of Michael J. Spence II v. State (Michael J. Spence II v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Michael J. Spence II v. State, (Ga. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,_________________ August 10, 2012

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A12A2158. MICHAEL J. SPENCE II v. THE STATE.

In 2009, Michael J. Spence, II, pled guilty to two counts of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and one count of aggravated assault with intent to rape. He filed a motion to withdraw his plea, which the trial court denied. We affirmed the trial court’s judgment. See Case No. A11A0993, decided August 3, 2011. After the remittitur, Spence filed an untimely motion to modify his sentence, which the trial court denied. Spence appealed from the trial court’s order. In Case No. A12A1169, we dismissed Spence’s appeal. Spence then filed a second motion to modify his sentence, in which he argued that his sentence was void. The trial court denied that motion, and this appeal followed. In his motion, Spence argued primarily that he was sentenced for the same criminal conduct on each of the counts, and that the sentences should have merged. A direct appeal may lie from an order denying or dismissing a motion to correct a void sentence if the defendant raises a colorable claim that the sentence is, in fact, void or illegal. See Harper v. State, 286 Ga. 216 n.1 (686 SE2d 786) (2009); Burg v. State, 297 Ga. App. 118, 119 (676 SE2d 465) (2009). By pleading guilty, however, Spence “waived all defenses except that the indictment charged no crime.” Kemp v. Simpson, 278 Ga. 439, 439-440 (603 SE2d 267) (2004). Because he admitted to committing each of the crimes, he is estopped from now claiming that any of the counts should have merged. Sanders v. State, 282 Ga. App. 834, 836 (1) (a) (640 SE2d 353) (2006). Therefore, this is not a colorable void-sentence claim. Accordingly, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED. Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 08/10/2012 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,_________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,_________________ August 10, 2012

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A12A2158. MICHAEL J. SPENCE II v. THE STATE.

In 2009, Michael J. Spence, II, pled guilty to two counts of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and one count of aggravated assault with intent to rape. He filed a motion to withdraw his plea, which the trial court denied. We affirmed the trial court’s judgment. See Case No. A11A0993, decided August 3, 2011. After the remittitur, Spence filed an untimely motion to modify his sentence, which the trial court denied. Spence appealed from the trial court’s order. In Case No. A12A1169, we dismissed Spence’s appeal. Spence then filed a second motion to modify his sentence, in which he argued that his sentence was void. The trial court denied that motion, and this appeal followed. In his motion, Spence argued primarily that he was sentenced for the same criminal conduct on each of the counts, and that the sentences should have merged. A direct appeal may lie from an order denying or dismissing a motion to correct a void sentence if the defendant raises a colorable claim that the sentence is, in fact, void or illegal. See Harper v. State, 286 Ga. 216 n.1 (686 SE2d 786) (2009); Burg v. State, 297 Ga. App. 118, 119 (676 SE2d 465) (2009). By pleading guilty, however, Spence “waived all defenses except that the indictment charged no crime.” Kemp v. Simpson, 278 Ga. 439, 439-440 (603 SE2d 267) (2004). Because he admitted to committing each of the crimes, he is estopped from now claiming that any of the counts should have merged. Sanders v. State, 282 Ga. App. 834, 836 (1) (a) (640 SE2d 353) (2006). Therefore, this is not a colorable void-sentence claim. Accordingly, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED. Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 08/10/2012 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,_________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Michael J. Spence II v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-j-spence-ii-v-state-gactapp-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack