Michael J. Martin v. State of Florida

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Michael J. Martin v. State of Florida. Read the opinion of the Court — 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 7072
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 31, 2018·No. 17-3655·Published

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

No. 1D17-3655 _____________________________

MICHAEL J. MARTIN,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent. _____________________________

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel— Original Jurisdiction.

October 31, 2018

PER CURIAM.

DENIED.

OSTERHAUS and WINSOR, JJ., concur; WOLF, J., dissents with opinion. _____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

I would grant the petition for ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. See Andujar-Ruiz v. State, 205 So. 3d 803 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016) (holding appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to argue trial court’s instruction on duty to retreat constituted fundamental error).

_____________________________

Michael J. Martin, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Kaitlin Weiss, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Michael J. Martin v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Michael J. Martin v. State of Florida (Michael J. Martin v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Andujar-Ruiz v. State
205 So. 3d 803 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)