Michael J. Martin v. State of Florida
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D17-3655 _____________________________
MICHAEL J. MARTIN,
Petitioner,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent. _____________________________
Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel— Original Jurisdiction.
October 31, 2018
PER CURIAM.
DENIED.
OSTERHAUS and WINSOR, JJ., concur; WOLF, J., dissents with opinion. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
I would grant the petition for ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. See Andujar-Ruiz v. State, 205 So. 3d 803 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016) (holding appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to argue trial court’s instruction on duty to retreat constituted fundamental error).
_____________________________
Michael J. Martin, pro se, Petitioner.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Kaitlin Weiss, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Michael J. Martin v. State of Florida (Michael J. Martin v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.