Michael J. Martin v. State of Florida
This text of Michael J. Martin v. State of Florida (Michael J. Martin v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D17-3655 _____________________________
MICHAEL J. MARTIN,
Petitioner,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent. _____________________________
Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel— Original Jurisdiction.
October 31, 2018
PER CURIAM.
DENIED.
OSTERHAUS and WINSOR, JJ., concur; WOLF, J., dissents with opinion. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
WOLF, J., dissenting. I would grant the petition for ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. See Andujar-Ruiz v. State, 205 So. 3d 803 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016) (holding appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to argue trial court’s instruction on duty to retreat constituted fundamental error).
_____________________________
Michael J. Martin, pro se, Petitioner.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Kaitlin Weiss, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Michael J. Martin v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-j-martin-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2018.