Michael J. Heather v. Chad Spencer and Amanda C. Watson
Opinion
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
Case No. 5D2023-3261
LT Case No. 2022-10676-FMDL
MICHAEL J. HEATHER,
Appellant,
v.
CHAD SPENCER and AMANDA C. WATSON,
Appellees.
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County. Christopher Kelly, Judge.
Martin Pedata, of the Law Office of Martin Pedata, DeLand, for Appellant.
David L. Ferguson, of Woodard & Ferguson, P.A., Ormond Beach, for Appellee, Amanda C. Watson.
No Appearance for Remaining Appellee.
October 18, 2024
PER CURIAM.
Appellant appeals the trial court’s order denying his petition to establish paternity that challenged a voluntary acknowledgment of paternity by Appellees. Appellant argues that
the trial court erred when it determined he failed to meet his burden to rebut the presumption of paternity even though the trial court expressly found that the voluntary acknowledgement was the product of fraud. See § 742.10(1), (4), Fla. Stat. (2023). We agree.
Based upon the undisputed evidence and the trial court’s finding of fraud, the basis for denying the petition was in error. We therefore reverse and remand for further proceedings.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
LAMBERT, EISNAUGLE, and SOUD, JJ., concur.
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Michael J. Heather v. Chad Spencer and Amanda C. Watson (Michael J. Heather v. Chad Spencer and Amanda C. Watson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.