Michael J. Hauf v. Natalya Hauf

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 24, 2019
DocketA20A0835
StatusPublished

This text of Michael J. Hauf v. Natalya Hauf (Michael J. Hauf v. Natalya Hauf) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Michael J. Hauf v. Natalya Hauf, (Ga. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ December 06, 2019

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A20A0835. MICHAEL J. HAUF v. NATALYA HAUF.

Michael J. Hauf filed this direct appeal from the trial court’s “Stalking Twelve Month Protective Order” prohibiting him from contacting his ex-wife. However, appeals of orders in domestic relations cases – including actions arising under the Family Violence Act – must be initiated by filing an application for discretionary appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (2), (b); Schmidt v. Schmidt, 270 Ga. 461, 461-462 (1) (510 SE2d 810) (1999). “Compliance with the discretionary appeals procedure is jurisdictional.” Smoak v. Dept. of Human Resources, 221 Ga. App. 257, 257 (471 SE2d 60) (1996). Michael Hauf’s failure to follow the required appellate procedure deprives us of jurisdiction over this direct appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 12/06/2019 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schmidt v. Schmidt
510 S.E.2d 810 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1999)
Smoak v. Department of Human Resources
471 S.E.2d 60 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Michael J. Hauf v. Natalya Hauf, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-j-hauf-v-natalya-hauf-gactapp-2019.