Michael J. Giles v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 5, 2019·No. 18-1110·Published

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

No. 1D18-1110

MICHAEL J. GILES,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus – Original Jurisdiction.

February 5, 2019

PER CURIAM.

The writ of habeas corpus alleging ineffectiveness of appellate counsel is denied as untimely, pursuant to rule 9.141(d)(5), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Partridge v. Moore, 768 So. 2d 1128 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). Even if we were to reach the merits, appellate counsel is not ineffective for failure to raise every conceivable nonfrivolous issue. See Valentine v. State, 98 So. 3d 44, 57 (Fla. 2012).

BILBREY, WINOKUR, and JAY, JJ., concur.

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

Bruce S. Rogow and Tara A. Campion, Fort Lauderdale, for Petitioner.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, and Virginia Chester Harris, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Michael J. Giles v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Michael J. Giles v. State of Florida (Michael J. Giles v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Partridge v. Moore
768 So. 2d 1128 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Valentine v. State
98 So. 3d 44 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2012)