Michael J. Giles v. State of Florida
This text of Michael J. Giles v. State of Florida (Michael J. Giles v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D18-1110 _____________________________
MICHAEL J. GILES,
Petitioner,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent. _____________________________
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus – Original Jurisdiction.
February 5, 2019
PER CURIAM.
The writ of habeas corpus alleging ineffectiveness of appellate counsel is denied as untimely, pursuant to rule 9.141(d)(5), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Partridge v. Moore, 768 So. 2d 1128 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). Even if we were to reach the merits, appellate counsel is not ineffective for failure to raise every conceivable nonfrivolous issue. See Valentine v. State, 98 So. 3d 44, 57 (Fla. 2012).
BILBREY, WINOKUR, and JAY, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Bruce S. Rogow and Tara A. Campion, Fort Lauderdale, for Petitioner.
Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, and Virginia Chester Harris, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Michael J. Giles v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-j-giles-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2019.