Michael J. Giles v. State of Florida
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
No. 1D18-1110
MICHAEL J. GILES,
Petitioner,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent.
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus – Original Jurisdiction.
February 5, 2019
PER CURIAM.
The writ of habeas corpus alleging ineffectiveness of appellate counsel is denied as untimely, pursuant to rule 9.141(d)(5), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Partridge v. Moore, 768 So. 2d 1128 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). Even if we were to reach the merits, appellate counsel is not ineffective for failure to raise every conceivable nonfrivolous issue. See Valentine v. State, 98 So. 3d 44, 57 (Fla. 2012).
BILBREY, WINOKUR, and JAY, JJ., concur.
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.
Bruce S. Rogow and Tara A. Campion, Fort Lauderdale, for Petitioner.
Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, and Virginia Chester Harris, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Michael J. Giles v. State of Florida (Michael J. Giles v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.