Michael J. Edison & Co. v. Columbia Pictures Television, Inc.

837 So. 2d 1122, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1833, 2003 WL 355235
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 19, 2003·No. No. 4D02-602·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm. We find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying appellants’ motion to intervene filed four days before the scheduled foreclosure sale. See Fla. Wildlife Fed’n, Inc. v. Bd. of Trs. of Internal Improvement, 707 So.2d 841, 842 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998) (holding that “intervention is a matter of a court’s discretion”); Hatcher v. Roberts, 478 So.2d 1083, 1086 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985) (finding no abuse of discretion in order denying intervention where motion was filed one day before final arguments were heard on defendant’s summary judgment motion which was filed three months earlier).

AFFIRMED.

STONE, WARNER and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Michael J. Edison & Co. v. Columbia Pictures Television, Inc., 837 So. 2d 1122, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1833, 2003 WL 355235 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

837 So. 2d 1122 (Michael J. Edison & Co. v. Columbia Pictures Television, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fla. Wildlife Federation v. Internal Imp.
707 So. 2d 841 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Hatcher v. Roberts
478 So. 2d 1083 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)