Michael Inman v. Don Smith Erifilie C. Marsh

Eighth Circuit

Michael Inman v. Don Smith Erifilie C. Marsh

5 F.3d 532, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 30234, 1993 WL 349203

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 9, 1993

Docket93-1198

StatusPublished

This text of 5 F.3d 532 (Michael Inman v. Don Smith Erifilie C. Marsh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Michael Inman v. Don Smith Erifilie C. Marsh, 5 F.3d 532, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 30234, 1993 WL 349203 (8th Cir. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

5 F.3d 532
NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that no party may cite an opinion not intended for publication unless the cases are related by identity between the parties or the causes of action.

Michael INMAN, Appellant,
v.
Don SMITH; Erifilie C. Marsh, Appellees.

No. 93-1198.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: July 23, 1993.
Filed: September 9, 1993.

Before JOHN R. GIBSON, MAGILL, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Michael Inman, a Missouri inmate, appeals the magistrate judge's1 denial without prejudice of his fourth motion for appointment of counsel. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude the magistrate judge did not abuse his discretion in denying the motion. See Rayes v. Johnson, 969 F.2d 700, 702-03 (8th Cir.) (standard of review), cert. denied, 113 S. Ct. 658 (1992).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

The Honorable William A. Knox, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Missouri

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI