Michael Holt and Frances Hodges v. Hunt Oil Company and Jed Densman
This text of Michael Holt and Frances Hodges v. Hunt Oil Company and Jed Densman (Michael Holt and Frances Hodges v. Hunt Oil Company and Jed Densman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
11TH COURT OF APPEALS EASTLAND, TEXAS JUDGMENT
Michael Holt and Frances Hodges, * From the 118th District Court of Martin County, Trial Court No. 6842.
Vs. No. 11-16-00097-CV * September 22, 2016
Hunt Oil Company and Jed Densman, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)
This court has considered the parties’ joint motion to dismiss this appeal with prejudice and concludes that the motion should be granted. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the appeal is dismissed. The costs incurred by reason of this appeal are taxed against the party incurring same.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Michael Holt and Frances Hodges v. Hunt Oil Company and Jed Densman, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-holt-and-frances-hodges-v-hunt-oil-company-and-jed-densman-texapp-2016.