Michael Hinzmann, M.D. and Consultants in Radiology v. James Bowers
This text of Michael Hinzmann, M.D. and Consultants in Radiology v. James Bowers (Michael Hinzmann, M.D. and Consultants in Radiology v. James Bowers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
NO. 2-09-366-CV
MICHAEL HINZMANN, M.D. APPELLANTS
AND CONSULTANTS IN RADIOLOGY
V.
JAMES BOWERS APPELLEE
----------
FROM THE 153RD DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION (footnote: 1) AND JUDGMENT
We have considered appellants’ “Unopposed Motion To Dismiss Appeal With Prejudice.” It is the court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).
Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same , for which let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.
PER CURIAM
PANEL: GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.
DELIVERED: January 21, 2010
FOOTNOTES
1:
See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Michael Hinzmann, M.D. and Consultants in Radiology v. James Bowers, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-hinzmann-md-and-consultants-in-radiology-v-texapp-2010.