Michael Hinzmann, M.D. and Consultants in Radiology v. James Bowers

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 21, 2010·No. 02-09-00366-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-09-366-CV

MICHAEL HINZMANN, M.D. APPELLANTS

AND CONSULTANTS IN RADIOLOGY

V.

JAMES BOWERS APPELLEE

----------

FROM THE 153RD DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION (footnote: 1) AND JUDGMENT

----------

We have considered appellants’ “Unopposed Motion To Dismiss Appeal With Prejudice.”  It is the court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal.   See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same , for which let execution issue.   See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

PER CURIAM

PANEL:  GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.

DELIVERED:  January 21, 2010

FOOTNOTES

1:

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Michael Hinzmann, M.D. and Consultants in Radiology v. James Bowers, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Michael Hinzmann, M.D. and Consultants in Radiology v. James Bowers (Michael Hinzmann, M.D. and Consultants in Radiology v. James Bowers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.