Michael Hill v. Shermco Industries

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 29, 2013·No. 05-12-01101-CV·Published

Opinion

DISMISS; and Opinion Filed October 29, 2013.

S In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-12-01101-CV

MICHAEL HILL, Appellant

V.

SHERMCO INDUSTRIES, Appellee

On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-10-04535

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Moseley, Lang, and Brown Opinion by Justice Brown

In an order dated September 13, 2013, the Court struck appellant’s brief as deficient and

instructed him to file an amended brief within thirty days of the date of the order. We cautioned

appellant that failure to file an amended brief within the time requested would result in dismissal

of his appeal without further notice.

As of today’s date, appellant has not filed an amended brief. Accordingly, we dismiss the

appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1) & 42.3(c).

/Ada Brown/ ADA BROWN

121101F.P05 JUSTICE

S

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT

MICHAEL HILL, Appellant On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas.

No. 05-12-01101-CV V. Trial Court Cause No. DC-10-04535.

Opinion delivered by Justice Brown.

SHERMCO INDUSTRIES, Appellee Justices Moseley and Lang, participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that appellee, SHERMCO INDUSTRIES, recover its costs of this appeal from appellant, MICHAEL HILL.

Judgment entered this 29th day of October, 2013.

/Ada Brown/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Michael Hill v. Shermco Industries, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Michael Hill v. Shermco Industries (Michael Hill v. Shermco Industries) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.