Michael Henry Wright v. State
This text of Michael Henry Wright v. State (Michael Henry Wright v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued April 1, 2010
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
NO. 01-08-00925-CR
MICHAEL HENRY WRIGHT, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 248th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 1172742
MEMORANDUM OPINION
In his sole issue, Michael Henry Wright, appellant, contends the trial court’s judgment erroneously reflects that he was convicted of the first degree felony of aggravated sexual assault of a child under the age of 14. Appellant requests that we modify the judgment to show he was convicted of second degree indecency with a child by contact. The State agrees that the judgment should be modified.
The record shows appellant was initially charged with the first degree felony of aggravated sexual assault of a child under the age of 14 that occurred on or about February 17, 2007. Appellant pleaded guilty without an agreed recommendation to the reduced charge of second degree indecency with a child by contact. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 21.11 (Vernon Supp. 2009). Although there is no dispute appellant pleaded guilty and was convicted of second degree indecency with a child by contact, the judgment erroneously reflects he was convicted of first degree felony aggravated sexual assault of a child under the age of 14.
We modify the judgment to show appellant was convicted of second degree indecency with a child by contact, and affirm the judgment, as modified. See St. Julian v. State, 132 S.W.3d 512, 517 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2004, pet. ref’d); Asberry v. State, 813 S.W.2d 526, 529 (Tex. App.—Dallas 1991, pet. ref’d).
CONCLUSION
As
modified, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Elsa Alcala
Justice
Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Alcala and Higley.
Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Michael Henry Wright v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-henry-wright-v-state-texapp-2010.