Michael Head and All Occupants v. Dacyn Investments LTD
This text of Michael Head and All Occupants v. Dacyn Investments LTD (Michael Head and All Occupants v. Dacyn Investments LTD) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
No. 06-18-00089-CV
MICHAEL HEAD AND ALL OCCUPANTS, Appellants
V.
DACYN INVESTMENTS LTD, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 Bell County, Texas Trial Court No. 87,756
Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Stevens MEMORANDUM OPINION Michael Head filed a timely notice of appeal on September 12, 2018. 1 The clerk’s record
was filed on September 26, 2018. The reporter’s record was filed on November 2, 2018. The
original deadline for Head’s appellate brief was December 3, 2018. When neither a brief nor a
motion to extend time for filing same was received by December 3, 2018, this Court advised Head
by letter dated December 18, 2018, that the brief was late. We further extended the deadline for
filing the brief to January 2, 2019. We warned Head that failure to file the brief by January 2,
2019, would subject this appeal to dismissal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P.
38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), (c).
We have received no responsive communication from Head and have not received his
appellate brief. Having received no response to this Court’s letter of December 18, 2018, Head’s
appeal is ripe for dismissal for want of prosecution. Consequently, Pursuant to Rules 38.8 and
42.3 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution.
See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), (c).
Scott E. Stevens Justice
Date Submitted: January 17, 2019 Date Decided: January 18, 2019
1 Originally appealed to the Third Court of Appeals, this case was transferred to this Court by the Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001 (West 2013). We are unaware of any conflict between precedent of the Third Court of Appeals and that of this Court on any relevant issue. See TEX. R. APP. P. 41.3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Michael Head and All Occupants v. Dacyn Investments LTD, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-head-and-all-occupants-v-dacyn-investments-ltd-texapp-2019.