Michael Hardy v. State of Florida
192 So. 3d 1257, 2016 WL 3186523, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 8841
Opinion
This is an appeal from the trial court’s denial of appellant’s rule 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence. Appellant has filed two rule 3.800(a) motions, one in July 2009 and one in February 2015. Although the trial court’s order does not reflect the date of the motion, we construe it as a ruling on the July 2009 motion. As such, we affirm without comment. This opinion does not preclude appellant from seeking a ruling on his February 2015 motion.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Michael Hardy v. State of Florida, 192 So. 3d 1257, 2016 WL 3186523, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 8841 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).
192 So. 3d 1257 (Michael Hardy v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.