Michael H. Juliano v. Hobart Manufacturing Company

303 F.2d 830, 133 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 667, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 4779
CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit
DecidedJune 15, 1962
Docket5989
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 303 F.2d 830 (Michael H. Juliano v. Hobart Manufacturing Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Michael H. Juliano v. Hobart Manufacturing Company, 303 F.2d 830, 133 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 667, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 4779 (1st Cir. 1962).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff, having made and sold to the public an attachment for defendant’s machine, sold one to defendant, to which he now seeks to attach a confidential relationship. After the sale to defendant the plaintiff obtained a design patent on his device. Defendant presently manufactures an attachment which admittedly is so different that there is no infringement of plaintiff’s design patent. The district court ordered summary judgment for the defendant. There was no error.

Judgment will be entered affirming the judgment of the District Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ofria v. Commissioner
77 T.C. 524 (U.S. Tax Court, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
303 F.2d 830, 133 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 667, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 4779, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-h-juliano-v-hobart-manufacturing-company-ca1-1962.