Michael H. Juliano v. Hobart Manufacturing Company

303 F.2d 830, 133 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 667, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 4779
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided June 15, 1962·No. 5989·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff, having made and sold to the public an attachment for defendant’s machine, sold one to defendant, to which he now seeks to attach a confidential relationship. After the sale to defendant the plaintiff obtained a design patent on his device. Defendant presently manufactures an attachment which admittedly is so different that there is no infringement of plaintiff’s design patent. The district court ordered summary judgment for the defendant. There was no error.

Judgment will be entered affirming the judgment of the District Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Michael H. Juliano v. Hobart Manufacturing Company, 303 F.2d 830, 133 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 667, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 4779 (1st Cir. 1962).

303 F.2d 830 (Michael H. Juliano v. Hobart Manufacturing Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ofria v. Commissioner
77 T.C. 524 (U.S. Tax Court, 1981)