Michael Griffis v. Chuck Medford

348 F. App'x 194
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedOctober 21, 2009
Docket08-2892
StatusUnpublished

This text of 348 F. App'x 194 (Michael Griffis v. Chuck Medford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Michael Griffis v. Chuck Medford, 348 F. App'x 194 (8th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Arkansas inmate Michael S. Griffis appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of partial summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. 2 The claims disposed of in these rulings concerned Griffis’s allegations of poor housing conditions and deficient medical care at the Carroll County Detention Center, where he spent almost three years as a pretrial detainee. Having found no merit to the issues Griffis raises on appeal, see Roe v. Crawford, 514 F.3d 789, 793 (8th Cir.) (standard of review), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 109, 172 L.Ed.2d 34 (2008), we affirm, see 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable James R. Marschewski, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.

2

. The remaining claims, concerning lock-down and a restraint chair, were disposed of (in his favor) following a hearing. This ruling is not at issue on appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Roe v. Crawford
514 F.3d 789 (Eighth Circuit, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
348 F. App'x 194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-griffis-v-chuck-medford-ca8-2009.