Michael Goode v. Thelma Lee Goode

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 23, 2004
Docket13-03-00773-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Michael Goode v. Thelma Lee Goode (Michael Goode v. Thelma Lee Goode) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Michael Goode v. Thelma Lee Goode, (Tex. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion



NUMBER 13-03-773-CV


COURT OF APPEALS


THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS


CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

_____________________________________________________________________


MICHAEL GOODE,                                                            Appellant,


v.


THELMA LEE GOODE,                                                        Appellee.

_____________________________________________________________________


On appeal from the 267th District Court

of Victoria County, Texas

_____________________________________________________________________


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Before Justices Hinojosa, Yañez, and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam


         Appellant, MICHAEL GOODE, attempted to perfect an appeal from a judgment entered by the 267th District Court of Victoria County, Texas, in cause number 01-8-56,909-C. Judgment in this cause was signed on December 2, 2003. No timely motion for new trial was filed. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 26.1, appellant’s notice of appeal was due on January 2, 2004, but was not filed until February 6, 2004.

         Notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this Court’s letter, the appeal would be dismissed. To date, no response has been received from appellant.

         The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant’s failure to timely perfect his appeal, and appellant’s failure to respond to this Court’s notice, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

                                                               PER CURIAM



Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this

the 23rd day of September, 2004.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Michael Goode v. Thelma Lee Goode, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-goode-v-thelma-lee-goode-texapp-2004.