Michael Goldstein v. Richard Diamond
This text of 623 F. App'x 841 (Michael Goldstein v. Richard Diamond) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Michael Goldstein appeals the judgment of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (BAP), affirming the bankruptcy court’s 1 order dismissing his adversarial complaint. Upon independent review, we conclude that Goldstein lacks standing to appeal the bankruptcy court’s order. See Sears v. U.S. Tr., 734 F.3d 810, 819 (8th Cir.2013) (appellate standing in bankruptcy cases is more limited than Article III standing or prudential standing requirements associated therewith; person-aggrieved doctrine limits standing to persons with financial stake in bankruptcy court’s order, meaning they were directly and adversely affected by order). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See In re Heyl, 770 F.3d 729, 731 (8th Cir.2014) (per curiam) (dismissing bankruptcy litigant’s appeal for lack of standing).
. The Honorable Charles E. Rendlen III, United States Bankruptcy Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
623 F. App'x 841, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-goldstein-v-richard-diamond-ca8-2015.