Michael Goldstein v. Richard Diamond

623 F. App'x 841
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedDecember 14, 2015
Docket15-2408
StatusUnpublished

This text of 623 F. App'x 841 (Michael Goldstein v. Richard Diamond) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Michael Goldstein v. Richard Diamond, 623 F. App'x 841 (8th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Michael Goldstein appeals the judgment of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (BAP), affirming the bankruptcy court’s 1 order dismissing his adversarial complaint. Upon independent review, we conclude that Goldstein lacks standing to appeal the bankruptcy court’s order. See Sears v. U.S. Tr., 734 F.3d 810, 819 (8th Cir.2013) (appellate standing in bankruptcy cases is more limited than Article III standing or prudential standing requirements associated therewith; person-aggrieved doctrine limits standing to persons with financial stake in bankruptcy court’s order, meaning they were directly and adversely affected by order). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See In re Heyl, 770 F.3d 729, 731 (8th Cir.2014) (per curiam) (dismissing bankruptcy litigant’s appeal for lack of standing).

1

. The Honorable Charles E. Rendlen III, United States Bankruptcy Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Robert A. Sears v. Joseph H. Badami
734 F.3d 810 (Eighth Circuit, 2013)
Steve Conway v. Richard Heyl
770 F.3d 729 (Eighth Circuit, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
623 F. App'x 841, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-goldstein-v-richard-diamond-ca8-2015.