Michael George Searle v. Karen Jean Brooks

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 5, 2007
Docket13-07-00181-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Michael George Searle v. Karen Jean Brooks (Michael George Searle v. Karen Jean Brooks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Michael George Searle v. Karen Jean Brooks, (Tex. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion



NUMBER 13-07-181-CV



COURT OF APPEALS



THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________



MICHAEL GEORGE SEARLE, Appellant,



v.



KAREN JEAN BROOKS, Appellee.

____________________ _______________________________________



On appeal from the 404th District Court

of Cameron County, Texas.

___________________ ________________________________________



MEMORANDUM OPINION



Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam



Appellant, MICHAEL GEORGE SEARLE, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 404th District Court of Cameron County, Texas, in cause number 2005-11-5562-G. No clerk's record has been filed due to appellant's failure to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk's fee for preparing the clerk's record.

If the trial court clerk fails to file the clerk's record because the appellant failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk's fee for preparing the clerk's record, the appellate court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless the appellant was entitled to proceed without payment of costs. Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).

On May 8, 2007, notice was given to all parties that this appeal was subject to dismissal pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). Appellant was given ten days to explain why the cause should not be dismissed. To date, no response has been received from appellant.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant's failure to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk's fee for preparing the clerk's record, this Court's notice, and appellant's failure to respond, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.

PER CURIAM



Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed

this the 5th day of July, 2007.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Michael George Searle v. Karen Jean Brooks, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-george-searle-v-karen-jean-brooks-texapp-2007.