Michael Gave v. Grace Line, Inc., Alfred Desmedt and Roy Thomas Currie

Third Circuit

Michael Gave v. Grace Line, Inc., Alfred Desmedt and Roy Thomas Currie

346 F.2d 567, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 5106

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedJune 25, 1965

Docket15218

StatusPublished

This text of 346 F.2d 567 (Michael Gave v. Grace Line, Inc., Alfred Desmedt and Roy Thomas Currie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Michael Gave v. Grace Line, Inc., Alfred Desmedt and Roy Thomas Currie, 346 F.2d 567, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 5106 (3d Cir. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In the instant case it appears that the District Court, 237 F.Supp. 557, granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment on December 7, 1964. The defendants had not then filed their Answers to the plaintiff’s interrogatories although they had been directed to do so by the District Court’s Order dated May 25, 1964.

Counsel for the defendants has now advised this Court that it is prepared to file Answers to the plaintiff’s interrogatories. Inasmuch as such Answers may develop the existence of a genuine issue as to a material fact, the District Court’s Judgment of December 7, 1964 will be vacated and the cause remanded so that the defendants’ Answers to the plaintiff’s interrogatories may be filed, with directions to the District Court to make such disposition as it may deem requisite upon consideration of such Answers.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In the instant case it appears that the District Court, 237 F.Supp. 557, granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment on December 7, 1964. The defendants had not then filed their Answers to the plaintiff’s interrogatories although they had been directed to do so by the District Court’s Order dated May 25, 1964.

Counsel for the defendants has now advised this Court that it is prepared to file Answers to the plaintiff’s interrogatories. Inasmuch as such Answers may develop the existence of a genuine issue as to a material fact, the District Court’s Judgment of December 7, 1964 will be vacated and the cause remanded so that the defendants’ Answers to the plaintiff’s interrogatories may be filed, with directions to the District Court to make such disposition as it may deem requisite upon consideration of such Answers.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

346 F.2d 567, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 5106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michael-gave-v-grace-line-inc-alfred-desmedt-and-roy-thomas-currie-ca3-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack