Michael G. Kendrick v. State

204 So. 3d 486, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 10921
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 15, 2016·No. 5D15-3730·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders 1 appeal, a review of the record shows no apparent reversible error. See State v. Causey, 503 So.2d 321 (Fla. 1987). Following a proper plea colloquy, Michael Gerard Kendrick (“Appellant”) entered a guilty plea, accepting the trial court’s offer of a two-year prison sentence. Appellant never moved to withdraw his plea in the trial court but now seeks a direct appeal challenging the voluntariness of his plea based on the advice of his trial counsel. Because Appellant did not properly preserve this issue for purposes of a direct appeal with the trial court, he must raise the issue through a timely motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Accordingly, we affirm Kendrick’s conviction and sentence without prejudice to his ability to file a timely Rule 3.850 motion.

AFFIRMED.

BERGER, WALLIS and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.
1

. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Michael G. Kendrick v. State, 204 So. 3d 486, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 10921 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

204 So. 3d 486 (Michael G. Kendrick v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
State v. Causey
503 So. 2d 321 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1987)