Michael Fred Wehrenberg v. State

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Michael Fred Wehrenberg v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2012 Tex. App. LEXIS 9291
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 2, 2012·No. 02-11-00576-CR·Published

Opinion

02-11-576-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-11-00576-CR

Michael Fred Wehrenberg

APPELLANT

V.

The State of Texas

STATE

----------

FROM THE 43rd District Court OF Parker COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION[1]

          Appellant Michael Fred Wehrenberg attempts to appeal from his conviction for possession of a controlled substance, methamphetamine, of one gram or more but less than four grams.  The trial court’s certification states that this “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal” and that “the defendant has waived the right of appeal.”  See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).  On January 3, 2012, we notified Wehrenberg that this appeal may be dismissed unless he or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal.  Wehrenberg’s appellate counsel filed a response agreeing that “there is no right to appeal in this cause”; thus, no grounds were shown for continuing the appeal.  In accordance with the trial court’s certification, we therefore dismiss this appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 43.2(f).

SUE WALKER
JUSTICE

PANEL:  WALKER, MCCOY, and MEIER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED:  February 2, 2012



[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Michael Fred Wehrenberg v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Michael Fred Wehrenberg v. State (Michael Fred Wehrenberg v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.