Michael Francis Slavik v. Watson B. Miller, Commissioner of Immigration and Naturalization
184 F.2d 575
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided October 30, 1950·No. 10208·Published·Cited by 9 cases
Opinion
The court below, 89 F.Supp. 575, lacked jurisdiction of the person of the Commissioner of Immigration and Naturalization and hence acquired no power to adjudicate the issues. We ruled to this effect in Podovinnikoff v. Miller, 3 Cir., 179 F.2d 937. See also Connor v. Miller, 2 Cir., 178 F.2d 755. It follows that the court below committed no error in entering the order complained of. Accordingly it will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Michael Francis Slavik v. Watson B. Miller, Commissioner of Immigration and Naturalization, 184 F.2d 575 (3d Cir. 1950).
184 F.2d 575 (Michael Francis Slavik v. Watson B. Miller, Commissioner of Immigration and Naturalization) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Chung Young Chew v. John P. Boyd, District Director of Immigration and Naturalization Service, United States Department of Justice, Seattle District
309 F.2d 857 (Ninth Circuit, 1962)
O'Rourke v. Levine
181 F. Supp. 947 (E.D. New York, 1960)
Di Battista v. Swing
135 F. Supp. 938 (D. Maryland, 1955)
Ceballos v. Shaughnessy
130 F. Supp. 30 (S.D. New York, 1955)
Rodriguez v. Landon
212 F.2d 508 (Ninth Circuit, 1954)
De Pinho Vaz v. Shaughnessy
112 F. Supp. 778 (S.D. New York, 1953)
Corona v. Landon
111 F. Supp. 191 (S.D. California, 1953)
Birns v. Commissioner of Immigration and Naturalization
103 F. Supp. 180 (N.D. Ohio, 1952)
Medalha v. Shaughnessy
102 F. Supp. 950 (S.D. New York, 1951)