Michael Farris, Jr. v. Richard Harvey Neuman and Karen Neuman

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 5, 2011·No. 02-10-00358-CV·Published

Opinion

02-10-358-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-10-00358-CV

Michael Farris, Jr.

APPELLANT

V.

Richard Harvey Neuman and Karen Neuman

APPELLEES

------------

FROM County Court at Law No. 1 OF Tarrant COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION[1] AND JUDGMENT

We have considered appellant's “Motion To Dismiss Without Prejudice.”  It is the court=s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellant, for which let execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM

PANEL:  LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ. 

DELIVERED:  May 5, 2011



[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Michael Farris, Jr. v. Richard Harvey Neuman and Karen Neuman, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Michael Farris, Jr. v. Richard Harvey Neuman and Karen Neuman (Michael Farris, Jr. v. Richard Harvey Neuman and Karen Neuman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.