Michael Farris, Jr. v. Richard Harvey Neuman and Karen Neuman
Opinion
|
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH |
NO. 02-10-00358-CV
|
Michael Farris, Jr. |
APPELLANT |
|
|
V. |
||
|
Richard Harvey Neuman and Karen Neuman |
APPELLEES |
|
------------
FROM County Court at Law No. 1 OF Tarrant COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION[1] AND JUDGMENT
We have considered appellant's “Motion To Dismiss Without Prejudice.” It is the court=s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).
Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellant, for which let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).
PER CURIAM
PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ.
DELIVERED: May 5, 2011
[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Michael Farris, Jr. v. Richard Harvey Neuman and Karen Neuman (Michael Farris, Jr. v. Richard Harvey Neuman and Karen Neuman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.